Re: [RFC] version 2 state diagram (take 2)

2007-02-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= writes: >I assume all the red arrows point to vcl_error()? Yes, I didn't want to clutter the drawing with them. >> vcl_hash{} >> Place holder for the idea that it might be desirable to >> hash on more or diffe

Re: [RFC] version 2 state diagram (take 2)

2007-02-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would appreciate if you call could take a moment to look at this > diagram and see if it makes sense: > > http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/varnish.png It certainly is a lot more readable than the complete diagram (http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/varnish

[RFC] version 2 state diagram (take 2)

2007-02-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
I would appreciate if you call could take a moment to look at this diagram and see if it makes sense: http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/varnish.png One way or another, something like this will be the cornerstone in explaning VCL to Varnish users, so I would appreciate feedback from you guys tha