On Jan 29, 2009, at 12:34 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message 4980f7d8.8090...@giraffen.dk, Anton Stonor writes:
New try. First, a request with no expire or cache-control header.
10 RxProtocol b HTTP/1.1
10 RxStatus b 200
10 RxResponse b OK
10 RxHeader b Server:
In message 9e3c9108-eb3a-485c-adc0-948860f4b...@digitalmarbles.com, Ricardo N
ewbery writes:
9 TTL c 1495399095 RFC 0 1233187840 0 0 0 0
But would this matter since he is resetting the obj.ttl to 1 day in
vcl_fetch?
Yes, the RFC2616 based TTL is calculated before vcl_fetch is
On Jan 28, 2009, at 2:23 AM, Anton Stonor wrote:
sub vcl_recv {
set req.grace = 120s;
set req.backend = backend_0;
}
Is this truly all you have in vcl_recv? This will mean that any
cookied requests will get passed. Is this intentional?
Ric
Ricardo Newbery skrev:
sub vcl_recv {
set req.grace = 120s;
set req.backend = backend_0;
}
Is this truly all you have in vcl_recv? This will mean that any cookied
requests will get passed. Is this intentional?
No, this is not a production setup. My problem is not that I cache
On Jan 28, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Anton Stonor wrote:
Ricardo Newbery skrev:
sub vcl_recv {
set req.grace = 120s;
set req.backend = backend_0;
}
Is this truly all you have in vcl_recv? This will mean that any
cookied
requests will get passed. Is this intentional?
No, this is
