In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ryan Tomayko writes:
>On 11/12/08 3:19 AM, Ricardo Newbery wrote:
>Right. Sorry about the ambiguity in my original message. I'm asking
>specifically about Varnish using If-Modified-Since/If-None-Match to
>revalidate a stale cache entry with the backend.
>
>Can anyon
On 11/12/08 3:19 AM, Ricardo Newbery wrote:
> Unless this has changed with 2.0, varnish will *respond* to if-
> modified-since (IMS) with a 304 response if there is cached entry that
> fails this condition, but varnish will neither *pass* the IMS header
> to the backend (unless you customize t
On Nov 4, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Miles wrote:
> Ryan Tomayko wrote:
>> On 11/4/08 12:51 PM, Miles wrote:
>>> I know varnish doesn't do If-None-Match, but I don't think that is a
>>> problem in this scheme.
>>
>> I'm curious to understand why Varnish doesn't do validation /
>> conditional GET.
>> Has
On 11/4/08 2:19 PM, Miles wrote:
> AFAIK varnish does do if-modified-since, just not if-none-match
Oh, nice. Is this new in 2.0?
Ryan
___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-m
Ryan Tomayko wrote:
> On 11/4/08 12:51 PM, Miles wrote:
>> I know varnish doesn't do If-None-Match, but I don't think that is a
>> problem in this scheme.
>
> I'm curious to understand why Varnish doesn't do validation / conditional GET.
> Has If-Modified-Since/If-None-Match support been considere
On 11/4/08 12:51 PM, Miles wrote:
> I know varnish doesn't do If-None-Match, but I don't think that is a
> problem in this scheme.
I'm curious to understand why Varnish doesn't do validation / conditional GET.
Has If-Modified-Since/If-None-Match support been considered and rejected on
merit or is
