Re: Help debugging cacheability / ttl information?

2008-02-18 Thread Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
Denis Brækhus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, 1.1.2 is being considered now, but up until 1.1.2 my impression has been 1.0.4 was the best build with regards to stability. We have had varnish nodes running for 6-8 months now without interruption or any problems whatsoever. Until 1.1.2, 1.0.4

Re: Help debugging cacheability / ttl information?

2008-02-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Denis Brækhus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You should get a varnishlog entry for the TTL computation when an object is retrieved from the backend, but there won't be a log entry for VCL changing the TTL... Ok, thanks. I guess what I am missing is

Help debugging cacheability / ttl information?

2008-01-31 Thread Denis Brækhus
Hi, We have a setup with varnish in front of a lighttpd+fastcgi combo. For some reason or other the application doesn't send any cache control headers. Instead of doing the sensible thing (prodding the developers to fix it in the backend) I have taken it upon myself to fix it via VCL.