- Nick Loman n...@loman.net wrote:
Precisely, we only have perhaps 50 PHP children serving requests, so
if these are kept open to serve idle keep-alive connections, that
severely limits the numbers of dynamic page requests we can serve.
It sound like you and Michael need a limit on the
Michael S. Fischer wrote:
I've done that for a specific reason relating to backend PHP processes.
I don't dispute your reasoning; my employer does this as well.
KeepAlive with Apache/PHP can be a recipe for resource starvation on
your origin servers.
Hi Michael,
Precisely, we only have
Hi there,
Has anyone come to a satisfactory solution to the issue of running out
of local port numbers when Varnish makes a connection to the backend server?
Under Linux, my understanding is the number of available port numbers
can be increased to a maximum of 64511 by setting
Michael S. Fischer wrote:
On Apr 29, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message 49f87de4.3040...@loman.net, Nick Loman writes:
Has Varnish got a solution to this problem which does not involve
time-wait recycling? One thing I've thought of is perhaps SO_REUSEADDR
is used or
On Apr 29, 2009, at 9:30 AM, Nick Loman wrote:
Michael S. Fischer wrote:
On Apr 29, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message 49f87de4.3040...@loman.net, Nick Loman writes:
Has Varnish got a solution to this problem which does not involve
time-wait recycling? One thing I've
