Am Sonntag 16 März 2008 15:54:42 schrieben Sie:
Sascha Ottolski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now my question is: what kind of hardware would I need? Lots of RAM
seems to be obvious, what ever a lot may be...What about the disk
subsystem? Should I look into something like RAID-0 with many disk
Michael,
thanks a lot for taking the time to give me such a detailed answer.
please see my replies below.
Am Sonntag 16 März 2008 18:00:42 schrieb Michael S. Fischer:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Sascha Ottolski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The challenge is to server 20+ million image
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Sascha Ottolski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The challenge is to server 20+ million image files, I guess with
up to 1500 req/sec at peak.
well, wo far I have analyzed the webserver logs of one week. this
indicates that indeed there would be at least
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], C. H
andel writes:
Finally, I would advice you guys to seriously look at flash-disk
drives. The virtual elimination of seektime is just what you want
from a web server or cache.
Having Flash Drives for 400GB of content could kill some budgets ;)
It's a price
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Sascha Ottolski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The challenge is to server 20+ million image files, I guess with up to
1500 req/sec at peak.
A modern disk drive can service 100 random IOPS (@ 10ms/seek, that's
reasonable). Without any caching, you'd need 15 disks to
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Michael S. Fischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know why I'm having such a problem with this. Sigh! I think
I got it right this time.
If I were designing such a service, my choices would be:
Corrections:
(1) 4 machines, each with 4-disk RAID 0
Hi,
I'm relatively new to varnish (I'm having an eye on it since it appeared
in public, but so far never really used it). Now the time may have come
to give it whirl. And am wondering if someone could give me a little
advise to get me going.
The challenge is to server 20+ million image files,
