Harald Friessnegger har...@webmeisterei.com writes:
if that address space needs roughly the same amout of RAM as the storage
file's size - and the cache is not persisted (lost when varnishd is
restarted) - why do we need a storage file at all?
Because that's how virtual memory works.
hi des
thanks for your reply.
in order to get an idea how to optimize my setup and get a better
understanding i'd like to recap to make sure i understood correctly:
Am Dienstag, 24. März 2009 17:10:56 schrieb Dag-Erling Smørgrav:
If you're using a storage file, varnishd will use a relatively
Harald Friessnegger har...@webmeisterei.com writes:
i'd be happy to make varnish stick to a certain memory limit.
maybe you've got some ideas how to make that happen?
is the file backend i'm using too small?
If you're using a storage file, varnishd will use a relatively small
amount of memory
hi there
when i start varnishd i'll find two varnishd processes running afterwards:
# top
...
Mem: 1548288k total, 1540624k used, 7664k free, 2172k buffers
Swap: 1048568k total, 767628k used, 280940k free, 171980k cached
13271 nobody 15 0 1864m 771m 90m S 0
Harald Friessnegger har...@webmeisterei.com writes:
when i start varnishd i'll find two varnishd processes running
afterwards:
Yes.
is there a way to run varnish as a single process?
No.
the varnishd started by supervisor just needs 5% memory and gets
restarted if it grows above a certain
