On Feb 13, 2009, at 9:27 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Florian Gilcher
|
| How about the unexpected break when retrieving an empty document?
That's weird. Can you try again using 2.0.3?
Same issue. I'll report it.
| [1]: And undocumented. The documentation sadly leads to believe that
- Florian Gilcher varnish-li...@andersground.net wrote:
Skade
Added to the wiki group.
--
Redpill Linpro - Changing the Game
___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
Hi guys
I'm fairly new to Varnish and it's goodness and not that brilliant a
sysadmin (I'm a developer, really) and I have some questions about how
to go about setting up Varnish in a virtual hosting environment.
I've had a lot of trouble combining the technologies I use for
non-proxied hosting
Andreas Fassl afa...@... writes:
Hi, especially the caching is very important for us, because we want to
keep traffic away from the mp3 repository server.
So you recommend:
Client requests streaming on demand mp3
- lighthttpd does streaming and requests from
- varnish as reverse proxy/cache
2009/2/12 Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@redpill-linpro.com
]] Rob Ayres
| Does anyone have an idea what has caused this?
Not really, no. I'm going to get a buildbot slave going on Solaris so
we'll hopefully be able to avoid such bugs in the future. If you have
found a solution, patches are more
Poul-Henning Kamp p...@... writes:
This is necessary to be able to decide, per object, if it should be
stored in temporary (malloc) or persistent (disk) storage.
With some extra work, this will allow pass to become streaming.
Right now pass in vcl_recv is streaming, right? You're only
In message loom.20090213t100923-...@post.gmane.org, Ole Laursen writes:
Poul-Henning Kamp p...@... writes:
This is necessary to be able to decide, per object, if it should be
stored in temporary (malloc) or persistent (disk) storage.
With some extra work, this will allow pass to become
Poul-Henning Kamp p...@... writes:
Right now pass in vcl_recv is streaming, right?
You're only talking about if the
object is entered into the cache? Or both cases?
No, we never stream pass, the current design is aimed at freeing
up the backend as fast as possible, and we only start to
Ole Laursen o...@iola.dk writes:
I looked up private here
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html
and it says
Indicates that all or part of the response message is intended
for a single user and MUST NOT be cached by a shared cache. This
allows an origin
On Feb 13, 2009, at 4:54 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Ole Laursen o...@iola.dk writes:
I looked up private here
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html
and it says
Indicates that all or part of the response message is intended
for a single user and MUST NOT be
If I use varnish as cache between mp3 repository and lighttpd, lighttpd will
stream the cached contents, that is sufficient for us. If varnish could stream,
that would be fine, but I don't think that it is part of the original concept,
or?
- Originalnachricht -
Von: Dag-Erling
3. There doesn't seem to be a way to process live varnishncsa data
via a pipe. If this were possible, then I think I would find this whole
process a lot easier. Instead, it seems there are two options: to
historically dump log data via an option, or run as a daemon and send
output to a
Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
]] Damien Desmarets
| I have 1 question for you. I haven't found the response in the
| documentation/wiki. I think you have a big job to wrtie a good
| documentation ... the current is really poor !
If you want to help out with writing docs or suggest weak points,
13 matches
Mail list logo
