Denis Brækhus wrote:
So, my question is, how stable do you consider the current release to be?
I cannot comment on the code itself, but I can give a couple of comments
on how I perceive varnish as an end-user:
I have been using varnish in a production environment
(http://www.hio.no) for thr
Hi list,
I have scanned the pretty light backlogs on the Varnish lists, and I haven't
seen much discussion on the current state of Varnish. There was mention of
problems with lighthttpd, but other than that I couldn't find much..
So, my question is, how stable do you consider the current releas
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=
writes:
>I assume all the red arrows point to vcl_error()?
Yes, I didn't want to clutter the drawing with them.
>> vcl_hash{}
>> Place holder for the idea that it might be desirable to
>> hash on more or diffe
Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would appreciate if you call could take a moment to look at this
> diagram and see if it makes sense:
>
> http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/varnish.png
It certainly is a lot more readable than the complete diagram
(http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/varnish
I would appreciate if you call could take a moment to look at this
diagram and see if it makes sense:
http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/varnish.png
One way or another, something like this will be the cornerstone in
explaning VCL to Varnish users, so I would appreciate feedback from
you guys tha
