Re: Specification out of date?

2008-03-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Ricardo Newbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Yes, the spec is two years out of date. If you want Varnish to obey Cache-Control, it is trivial to implement in VCL. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav Senior Software Developer Linpro AS - www.linpro.no ___

Re: Specification out of date?

2008-03-20 Thread Ricardo Newbery
On Mar 20, 2008, at 2:15 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Ricardo Newbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Yes, the spec is two years out of date. Right. That much was apparent. My question again is shouldn't this document be updated? And is there still an intent to implement any of

Re: Specification out of date?

2008-03-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Ricardo Newbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm actually more interested in trying to reproduce the semantics of the 'public' token. But I'm having trouble figuring out how to implement this one in vcl. In the default vcl, authenticated requests are passed through before any cache check or

Re: Specification out of date?

2008-03-20 Thread Ricardo Newbery
On Mar 20, 2008, at 6:07 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Ricardo Newbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If an authenticated request comes in and I have a valid cached copy, Varnish should not return the cached copy *unless* the copy contains a public' token. It's not enough that Varnish