]] Ingvar Hagelund
| * Tollef Fog Heen
| a short while before Christmas, I wrote up a small document pointing to
| what I would like to get into 2.1 (...)
| Varnish 2.1 release plan
| (...)
|
| Will 2.1 be backwards compatible with vcl and configuration settings
| from 2.0?
|
| ie, will I
Timothy Ball wrote:
a programming error caused varnish to think there were billions of
pages it had to know about. bug is quashed but varnish doesn't seem to
know
(..)
i tried doing url.purge .* and url.purge . to no avail.
url.purge .* will only invalidate the pages. They are not actually
]] Timothy Ball
| a programming error caused varnish to think there were billions of
| pages it had to know about. bug is quashed but varnish doesn't seem to
| know
|
| # this is a line from top
| 3596 0.2 28.3g 28g 3808 256 57m 1916 120 S 20 00 varnishd
| # this is a line
Agree
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@linpro.no wrote:
(Please reply only to -misc so we don't end up with a zillion copies of
this all over the lists.)
Hi,
we currently have very many mailing lists:
varnish-announceRelease announcements and other
Michael S. Fischer mich...@dynamine.net writes:
What are these non-Linux-specific issues to which the document refers?
The lack of a completion indicator + various implementation bugs. The
only OS I know of that has a usable implementation is FreeBSD 8.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav -
