2009/7/16 Ken Brownfield kb+varn...@slide.com:
Yeah, this one might be one for the Varnish devs. Only last thing I can
think of is that Apache is returning a response that's larger than
Content-Length: and Varnish is just closing the connection...
apache didn't set Content-Length on thiese
assuming that each user loads 40 files in 1 minute we get
12000*60/40=18 000 users per minute
Is it possible to get half of that 18k users/per minute in real word
ignoring the amounts of traffic it will generate ?
I'd say so, but it depends on how big the data set is. If you can store it
2009/7/16 Lazy lazy...@gmail.com:
2009/7/16 Ken Brownfield kb+varn...@slide.com:
Yeah, this one might be one for the Varnish devs. Only last thing I can
think of is that Apache is returning a response that's larger than
Content-Length: and Varnish is just closing the connection...
apache
2009/7/15 Lazy lazy...@gmail.com:
2009/7/14 Ken Brownfield kb+varn...@slide.com:
On Jul 14, 2009, at 3:05 AM, Kristian Lyngstol wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:46:58AM +0200, Lazy wrote:
the site is usually not so busy, but it has sometimes spikes of
static
traffic (about 50Mbps) that's
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out how many simultaneous users a single 8 core
machine with local apache running as a backend can handle assumming
that all the requests are cached.
testing with ab on a slow 100Mbps link shows 2500 hit/s, locally i got
12 000 hit/s with over 200Mbps traffic
assuming
2009/7/14 Kristian Lyngstol krist...@redpill-linpro.com:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:21:38AM +0200, Lazy wrote:
We are having hard time figuring out what's cosing varnish 503 error,
our backend is apache is debian 5 default, os is linux x86_64 2.6.26,
everything is running on a single machine
2009/7/14 Ken Brownfield k...@slide.com:
The progression from your dump is:
Varnish Apache
SYN
SYN+ACK
ACK
...4.4 seconds later...
SYN+ACK
ACK
PSH+ACK
ACK
FIN+ACK (???)
PSH+ACK
RST
right i missed the 4second gap, so
