users.
Thanks,
Miles
___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
users. I want to
specifically avoid each user having their own version of the page stored
in the cache.
Thanks in advance for any wisdom anyone can share!
Miles
___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no
Miles wrote:
Hi,
I have a site where users can log in. This sets a cookie with their
encrypted login details, so they can be authenticated. There are a
small number of pages which are user-specific (change your details
forms, etc), and these are set not to cache.
When a user
are ignored by the cache unless specified in
the vary header or special behaviour in VCL?
I'm trying to understand why we get a low level of cache hits, and want
to be certain of the facts.
Thanks,
Miles
___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc
varnish doesn't do If-None-Match, but I don't think that is a
problem in this scheme.
I haven't attempted this yet - can anyone see any holes in it as a
method? Or does anyone else have a way of dealing with this sort of
personalisation-lite?!
Thanks in advance for your help!
Miles
this case.
Thanks in advance,
Miles
___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
Ryan Tomayko wrote:
On 11/4/08 12:51 PM, Miles wrote:
I know varnish doesn't do If-None-Match, but I don't think that is a
problem in this scheme.
I'm curious to understand why Varnish doesn't do validation / conditional GET.
Has If-Modified-Since/If-None-Match support been considered
