Re: 2.1 plans

2009-01-12 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Ingvar Hagelund | * Tollef Fog Heen | > a short while before Christmas, I wrote up a small document pointing to | > what I would like to get into 2.1 (...) | > Varnish 2.1 release plan | > (...) | | Will 2.1 be backwards compatible with vcl and configuration settings | from 2.0? | | ie, will

Re: 2.1 plans

2009-01-09 Thread Michael S. Fischer
On Jan 9, 2009, at 1:59 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > | What about CARP-like cache routing (i.e., where multiple cache > servers > | themselves are hash buckets)? This would go a LONG way towards > | scalability. > > http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/wiki/PostTwoShoppingList second item > sounds

Re: 2.1 plans

2009-01-09 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] "Michael S. Fischer" | What about CARP-like cache routing (i.e., where multiple cache servers | themselves are hash buckets)? This would go a LONG way towards | scalability. http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/wiki/PostTwoShoppingList second item sounds like what you want? -- Tollef Fog Heen

Re: 2.1 plans

2009-01-09 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] "BUSTARRET, Jean-francois" | What about more ESI features (ie : cookie support), backend | revalidation with conditional GETs or streaming fetches | (http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/wiki/PostTwoShoppingList) ? More ESI support would be interesting too. However, we have a limited amount of

Re: 2.1 plans

2009-01-08 Thread Michael S. Fischer
+1. This is a very good idea for optimizing RAM utilization. --Michael On Jan 8, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Jeff Anderson wrote: > Thanks for the response. > > I think inline page compression would be great too. Store gzipped > objects in the persistent cache and unzip if uncompressed objects are > re

Re: 2.1 plans

2009-01-08 Thread Jeff Anderson
Thanks for the response. I think inline page compression would be great too. Store gzipped objects in the persistent cache and unzip if uncompressed objects are requested. On Jan 8, 2009, at 10:54 AM, Per Buer wrote: > Jeff Anderson wrote: >> I'd like to see individual object request sta

Re: 2.1 plans

2009-01-08 Thread Per Buer
Hi, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > Hi, > > a short while before Christmas, I wrote up a small document pointing to > what I would like to get into 2.1 and when I'd like milestones to > happen. This is a suggestion, I'm open to ideas and comments on both > feature set as well as if my guesstimates for

Re: 2.1 plans

2009-01-08 Thread Per Buer
Jeff Anderson wrote: > I'd like to see individual object request statistics and a method to > prefetch objects from the backend that are most frequently requested. > Perhaps also a way to prioritize objects into cache tiers based on > frequency of requests. So, for example, highly requested

Re: 2.1 plans

2009-01-08 Thread Jeff Anderson
I'd like to see individual object request statistics and a method to prefetch objects from the backend that are most frequently requested. Perhaps also a way to prioritize objects into cache tiers based on frequency of requests. So, for example, highly requested objects are maintained in

Re: 2.1 plans

2009-01-08 Thread Michael S. Fischer
What about CARP-like cache routing (i.e., where multiple cache servers themselves are hash buckets)? This would go a LONG way towards scalability. --Michael On Jan 8, 2009, at 2:29 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > Hi, > > a short while before Christmas, I wrote up a small document pointing

RE: 2.1 plans

2009-01-08 Thread BUSTARRET, Jean-francois
s.linpro.no > [mailto:varnish-misc-boun...@projects.linpro.no] De la part > de Tollef Fog Heen > Envoyé : jeudi 8 janvier 2009 11:30 > À : varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no > Objet : 2.1 plans > > > Hi, > > a short while before Christmas, I wrote up a small document > poi

2.1 plans

2009-01-08 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
Hi, a short while before Christmas, I wrote up a small document pointing to what I would like to get into 2.1 and when I'd like milestones to happen. This is a suggestion, I'm open to ideas and comments on both feature set as well as if my guesstimates for dates is completely off: Varnish 2.1 r