]] Ingvar Hagelund
| * Tollef Fog Heen
| > a short while before Christmas, I wrote up a small document pointing to
| > what I would like to get into 2.1 (...)
| > Varnish 2.1 release plan
| > (...)
|
| Will 2.1 be backwards compatible with vcl and configuration settings
| from 2.0?
|
| ie, will
On Jan 9, 2009, at 1:59 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | What about CARP-like cache routing (i.e., where multiple cache
> servers
> | themselves are hash buckets)? This would go a LONG way towards
> | scalability.
>
> http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/wiki/PostTwoShoppingList second item
> sounds
]] "Michael S. Fischer"
| What about CARP-like cache routing (i.e., where multiple cache servers
| themselves are hash buckets)? This would go a LONG way towards
| scalability.
http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/wiki/PostTwoShoppingList second item
sounds like what you want?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
]] "BUSTARRET, Jean-francois"
| What about more ESI features (ie : cookie support), backend
| revalidation with conditional GETs or streaming fetches
| (http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/wiki/PostTwoShoppingList) ?
More ESI support would be interesting too. However, we have a limited
amount of
+1. This is a very good idea for optimizing RAM utilization.
--Michael
On Jan 8, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Jeff Anderson wrote:
> Thanks for the response.
>
> I think inline page compression would be great too. Store gzipped
> objects in the persistent cache and unzip if uncompressed objects are
> re
Thanks for the response.
I think inline page compression would be great too. Store gzipped
objects in the persistent cache and unzip if uncompressed objects are
requested.
On Jan 8, 2009, at 10:54 AM, Per Buer wrote:
> Jeff Anderson wrote:
>> I'd like to see individual object request sta
Hi,
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a short while before Christmas, I wrote up a small document pointing to
> what I would like to get into 2.1 and when I'd like milestones to
> happen. This is a suggestion, I'm open to ideas and comments on both
> feature set as well as if my guesstimates for
Jeff Anderson wrote:
> I'd like to see individual object request statistics and a method to
> prefetch objects from the backend that are most frequently requested.
> Perhaps also a way to prioritize objects into cache tiers based on
> frequency of requests. So, for example, highly requested
I'd like to see individual object request statistics and a method to
prefetch objects from the backend that are most frequently requested.
Perhaps also a way to prioritize objects into cache tiers based on
frequency of requests. So, for example, highly requested objects are
maintained in
What about CARP-like cache routing (i.e., where multiple cache servers
themselves are hash buckets)? This would go a LONG way towards
scalability.
--Michael
On Jan 8, 2009, at 2:29 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> a short while before Christmas, I wrote up a small document pointing
s.linpro.no
> [mailto:varnish-misc-boun...@projects.linpro.no] De la part
> de Tollef Fog Heen
> Envoyé : jeudi 8 janvier 2009 11:30
> À : varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
> Objet : 2.1 plans
>
>
> Hi,
>
> a short while before Christmas, I wrote up a small document
> poi
Hi,
a short while before Christmas, I wrote up a small document pointing to
what I would like to get into 2.1 and when I'd like milestones to
happen. This is a suggestion, I'm open to ideas and comments on both
feature set as well as if my guesstimates for dates is completely off:
Varnish 2.1 r
12 matches
Mail list logo