In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "anda
n andan" writes:
>In our tests (varnish trunk rev 2635), vcl_fetch is still inserting
>the request in cache even though it got a "pass" in vcl_recv.
This is a case where the varnishlog output is a bit confusing:
When you mark the request for pass in vcl_rec
Hi all.
Whats happened with the possible bug related in
http://projects.linpro.no/pipermail/varnish-misc/2007-July/000626.html:
In our tests (varnish trunk rev 2635), vcl_fetch is still inserting
the request in cache even though it got a "pass" in vcl_recv.
Varnishlog attached.
Thanks.
Best re
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?And
r=E9_Cruz?= writes:
> From what I can see, if vcl_recv() returns "pass" the request can
>still be cached by logic in vcl_fetch(), right?
No, this is one of the things that figure does not show: the object
created by vcl_pass() is not in the has
Hello Poul.
Thanks for the quick answer.
On 2007/07/04, at 17:30, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
The state diagram has morphed a bit lately, DES is busy updating the
documentation and hopefully this will be covered RSN.
In the meantime, here is a snapshot of the current -trunks
stateenginge:
Hi Andre,
The state diagram has morphed a bit lately, DES is busy updating the
documentation and hopefully this will be covered RSN.
In the meantime, here is a snapshot of the current -trunks stateenginge:
http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/_.pdf
This is machine generated, see comment at the t
Hello.
After reading the vcl man page I was under the impression that after
a "pass" return from vcl_recv the request was simply forwarded to the
backend and the response would NOT be cached. In other words:
pass - bypass cache and just forward response from backend.
pipe - bypass cache and p
