On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Jacob Smullyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm delighted with varnish. However, I haven't had any luck so far
> with weighted random load-balancing. I am seeing it always use one
> backend, the one with the highest weight, and never us
I'm delighted with varnish. However, I haven't had any luck so far
with weighted random load-balancing. I am seeing it always use one
backend, the one with the highest weight, and never use the other
backends at all. That is not what I expected -- and the other
backends are heal
You're right. I should have mentioned that /trunk is of course
bleeding-edge and may not be entirely stable for production use.
I look forward to what you have to say about client affinity.
On Jan 18, 2008 1:12 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ca
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Cale
b Anthony" writes:
>Check out this page:
>
>http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/wiki/Backends
>
>This feature is only available in /trunk currently. So you'll have to
>download the source from SVN.
I'm not sure that core is entirely ready to be used, I have an
Jan 17, 2008 8:35 AM, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I remember there were discussions about possible HTTP load balancing
> features in Varnish, but I don't know what was the result. Does Varnish
> support load balancing (even simple round-robin would
x27; ';
print get_varnish_path('/image1.jpg').' ';
// Result
http://varnish4.site.com/image1.jpg
http://varnish1.site.com/image12.jpg
http://varnish3.site.com/image54.jpg
http://varnish1.site.com/image488.jpg
http://varnish4.site.com/image1.jpg
Fredrik Kristiansen
Nett
Hi,
I remember there were discussions about possible HTTP load balancing
features in Varnish, but I don't know what was the result. Does Varnish
support load balancing (even simple round-robin would be enough, IP
address hashing would be better)?
If not, does anyone has a recommendation ab
