\On Jun 1, 2008, at 1:38 PM, Michael S. Fischer wrote:
> Why are you using Varnish to serve primarily images? Modern
> webservers serve static files very efficiently off the filesystem.
Because we have about 6TB of content and are using Varnish as the
"hot" cache and S3 as the "cold" store.
Why are you using Varnish to serve primarily images? Modern webservers
serve static files very efficiently off the filesystem.
Best regards,
--Michael
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Barry Abrahamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone running multiple varnish insta
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Barry Abrahams
on writes:
>Hi,
>
>Is anyone running multiple varnish instances per server (one per disk
>or similar?)
Just remember to set the -n argument to something different.
Poul-Henning
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilo
Hi,
Is anyone running multiple varnish instances per server (one per disk
or similar?)
We are currently running a single varnish instance per server using
the file backend. Machines are Dual Opteron 2218, 4GB RAM, and 2
250GB SATA drives. We have the cache file on a software RAID 0
