Ken Brownfield
Verzonden: donderdag 5 november 2009 22:35
Aan: cripy
CC: varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
Onderwerp: Re: Varnish virtual memory usage
Hopefully your upper management allows you to install contemporary software
and distributions. Otherwise memory leaks and x86_64 would be the
Hopefully your upper management allows you to install contemporary
software and distributions. Otherwise memory leaks and x86_64 would
be the least of your concerns. Honestly, you're waiting for Varnish
to stabilize and you're running v1?
My data point: 5 months and over 100PB of transfer
s running stable now with some few tricks.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: varnish-misc-boun...@projects.linpro.no [mailto:
> varnish-misc-boun...@projects.linpro.no] On Behalf Of Kristian Lyngstol
> Sent: woensdag 21 oktober 2009 13:34
> To: Roi Avinoa
eld [mailto:k...@slide.com]
> Verzonden: donderdag 5 november 2009 0:31
> Aan: Henry Paulissen
> CC: varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
> Onderwerp: Re: Varnish virtual memory usage
>
> Looks like varnish is allocating ~1.5GB of RAM for pure cache (which
> may roughly match you
In message <003201ca5da9$57ae7e30$070b7a...@paulissen@qbell.nl>, "Henry Pauliss
en" writes:
>Our load balancer transforms all connections from keep-alive to close.
That is a bad idea really, it increases the amount of work varnish
has to do significantly.
>but 1,610 threads with your
>1MB stac
2009 0:31
Aan: Henry Paulissen
CC: varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
Onderwerp: Re: Varnish virtual memory usage
Looks like varnish is allocating ~1.5GB of RAM for pure cache (which
may roughly match your "-s file" option) but 1,610 threads with your
1MB stack limit will use 1.7GB of RAM
...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: woensdag 4 november 2009 22:04
Aan: Henry Paulissen
CC: Scott Wilson; varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
Onderwerp: Re: Varnish virtual memory usage
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Henry Paulissen
wrote:
> I will report back.
Did this solve the problem?
Removing t
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Henry Paulissen wrote:
> I will report back.
Did this solve the problem?
Removing this?
>>if (req.http.Cache-Control == "no-cache" || req.http.Pragma ==
>> "no-cache") {
>>purge_url(req.url);
>>}
>>
Cheers
Att,
--
Rogério Schn
no; k...@slide.com
Subject: Re: Varnish virtual memory usage
We had a similar problem where varnish would fill all swap and crash
every couple of weeks. The trick that seems to have solved the problem
was to remove purge.url from our VCL (a lot of badly behaved clients
send a lot more no-cache headers
"} obj.status " " obj.response {"
>
>
> Error "} obj.status " " obj.response {"
> "} obj.response {"
> Guru Meditation:
> XID: "} req.xid {&qu
For further details see my ticket: http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/ticket/546
@Kristian:
When the programmers / engineers have some spare time over, they are always
welcome to see it in live action.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Ken Brownfield [mailto:k...@slide.com]
oam
> Cc: varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
> Subject: Re: Varnish virtual memory usage
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:07:00PM +0200, Roi Avinoam wrote:
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> 1. What I did was create 100 simultaneous processes, and each process
>> requested
..@redpill-linpro.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 3:28 PM
To: Roi Avinoam
Cc: varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
Subject: Re: Varnish virtual memory usage
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:07:00PM +0200, Roi Avinoam wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> 1. What I did was create 100 simultaneous
-
From: 'Kristian Lyngstol' [mailto:krist...@redpill-linpro.com]
Sent: woensdag 21 oktober 2009 15:43
To: Henry Paulissen
Cc: varn...@redpill-linpro.com
Subject: Re: Varnish virtual memory usage
(ticket #546)
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 02:57:34PM +0200, Henry Paulissen wrote:
> Opened a
("forwarded" to -misc since I just notice the original went there too)
- Kristian
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:43:00PM +0200, 'Kristian Lyngstol' wrote:
> (ticket #546)
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 02:57:34PM +0200, Henry Paulissen wrote:
> > Opened a ticket for the problem, but the wont listen unt
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:07:00PM +0200, Roi Avinoam wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> 1. What I did was create 100 simultaneous processes, and each process
> requested the same page (with 'curl'):
> a. Once with the exact same URL - which resulted in a 99.9% hit-ratio
> and VERY high p
,
-Original Message-
From: varnish-misc-boun...@projects.linpro.no
[mailto:varnish-misc-boun...@projects.linpro.no] On Behalf Of Kristian Lyngstol
Sent: woensdag 21 oktober 2009 13:34
To: Roi Avinoam
Cc: varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
Subject: Re: Varnish virtual memory usage
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 02
--
From: Kristian Lyngstol [mailto:krist...@redpill-linpro.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 1:34 PM
To: Roi Avinoam
Cc: varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
Subject: Re: Varnish virtual memory usage
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 02:55:07PM +0300, Roi Avinoam wrote:
> At Metacafe we're testing the in
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 02:55:07PM +0300, Roi Avinoam wrote:
> At Metacafe we're testing the integration with Varnish, and I was tasked
> with benchmarking our Varnish setup. I intentionally over-flooded the
> server with requests, in an attempt to see how the system will behave
> under extensive t
What is the vcl config and what is in the RH system log?
--
Sent using BlackBerry
416 561 4871
-Original Message-
From: varnish-misc-boun...@projects.linpro.no
To: varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
Sent: Mon Sep 21 07:55:07 2009
Subject: Varnish virtual memory usag
20 matches
Mail list logo