Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Anup Shukla writes:
>
>> Anup Shukla wrote:
>>
>
>
>> Did not take it long to go down again.
>> But i am not able to find any "core" dumps.
>> Some help as to how to get one will be appreciated.
>>
>
> Ok, next step:
>
> Run
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Anup Shukla writes:
>Anup Shukla wrote:
>Did not take it long to go down again.
>But i am not able to find any "core" dumps.
>Some help as to how to get one will be appreciated.
Ok, next step:
Run varnishd in the forground by giving it two -d options:
var
Anup Shukla wrote:
> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> I've seen the automatic restart of the worker process fail here
>> during my testing, and I suspect you hit the same thing.
>>
>> I have it on my list of things to investigate RSN.
>>
>> Do you have any corefiles from varnishd by any chance ?
>>
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> I've seen the automatic restart of the worker process fail here
> during my testing, and I suspect you hit the same thing.
>
> I have it on my list of things to investigate RSN.
>
> Do you have any corefiles from varnishd by any chance ?
>
>
I just set ulimit -c unlim
I've seen the automatic restart of the worker process fail here
during my testing, and I suspect you hit the same thing.
I have it on my list of things to investigate RSN.
Do you have any corefiles from varnishd by any chance ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PRO
Hi All,
This is in continuation of the previous thread "Best Practices -
Suggestion Request"
The problem of varnish shutting down every 7-10 days still continues.
This resulted in significant amount of downtime, and hence i shifted all
but one server to "pound".
pound has been working fine.. bu
