>> First of all, varnishtop -i TxURL hangs on my system, it shows 3-5
>> Entries,
>> then freez and uses nearly 100%cpu on one of 8. Have to kill the pid.
>> varnishtop with no args works.
>
> Ok, that's not good... I've seen varnishtop hang like that before,
> but not
> with CPU usage. I've ye
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 03:28:22PM +0200, Kain Sascha wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the great Hints.
>
> First of all, varnishtop -i TxURL hangs on my system, it shows 3-5 Entries,
> then freez and uses nearly 100%cpu on one of 8. Have to kill the pid.
> varnishtop with no args works.
Ok, that's not
Thanks a lot for the great Hints.
First of all, varnishtop -i TxURL hangs on my system, it shows 3-5 Entries,
then freez and uses nearly 100%cpu on one of 8. Have to kill the pid.
varnishtop with no args works.
System:
2.6.18-6-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 16 22:30:01 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
varnish:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 01:28:36PM +0200, Kain Sascha wrote:
> /usr/local/sbin/varnishd -a :80 -b 89.250.xx.xx:80 -s malloc,15360M
You may want to supply a -w. The default is really whimpy which could
create problems during spikes of traffic. Try something like -w 400,800.
Varnishstat n_wrk_limite
Hi,
we run a big picture portal.
We used to cache our files with squid3, but now we want to try varnishd to
deliver our static files (jpg css and js).
we have 2 varnish servers, caching files from one big static server.
The static server doesnt have the fastest hdds.
The varnishd Servers have
