On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:37:52AM -0700, Tung Nguyen wrote:
> Im wondering how you are testing, Im using ab, apachebench, to see how
> things behave with -c 10 -n 1000, on the varnished pages.
I've got two ways of testing. One is with siege, typically run with siege
-c200 -b. Siege, however, is a
Hi guys,
So sometimes are backend is really slow in returning a response. So
slow that it looks like it
is causing varnish to timeout before the backend does and so varnish
seems to eventually give up
and returns a 503.
Ther are 4 curl requests
* the first 2 timeout and give a 503
* the 3rd one
Kristian, thank you.
Im glad to hear that most defaults are good.
Yup, the default thread_pool_min = 1 seems kinda funny. We'll set it to at
least 100.
I didnt even know about the cli_timeout and will set it to a base line of 10
seconds to test.
Im wondering how you are testing, Im using ab, a
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 05:58:58PM -0700, Tung Nguyen wrote:
> Hi guys,
> So, Im reading over an archive email thread about twitters configuration.
>
> http://projects.linpro.no/pipermail/varnish-dev/2009-February/000968.html
>
> It looks like they had to adjust a lot of parameters... and Im not
Hi guys,
So, Im reading over an archive email thread about twitters configuration.
http://projects.linpro.no/pipermail/varnish-dev/2009-February/000968.html
It looks like they had to adjust a lot of parameters... and Im not finding
all the parameters definitions in the varnishd man pages. Im won