First off, I would like to thank Per Buer for pointing out that I am off
by a factor of 1000 in the following
statements. I have corrected for that below so that my statements are
more clear. My mistake was in
considering modern processors as 2 megahertz instead of 2 gigahertz.
On 3/7/2011
On 3/8/2011 9:53 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In messageaanlktimweic5-+axmjhazpcqyc0huxhgdwaw4+l_6...@mail.gmail.com, Jona
than DeMello writes:
Poul simply comes across as a nervous child, throwing every superiority
imposing cliche out there because he thought a team member was
'threatened'.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Drew Smathers drew.smath...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Per Buer pe...@varnish-software.com wrote:
[snip]
That's Saint Mode - please
see http://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/trunk/tutorial/handling_misbehaving_servers.html#saint-mode
I see
Hi Drew, list.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Drew Smathers drew.smath...@gmail.comwrote:
Sorry to bump my own thread, but does anyone know of a way to set
saintmode if a backend is down, vs. up and misbehaving (returning 500,
etc)?
Also, I added a backend probe and this indeed caused
I would look at setting a fail director. Restart if there is a 503, and
if restarts 0 select the patient director with very generous health
checking. Your timeouts are reasonable, but try .timeout 20s and
.threshold 1 for the patient director. Having a different view of the
backends usually deals
An O(1) solution (e.g., a hash table) is a perfectly valid optimization of
an O(N) solution. But you are confusing an O(N) solution with an O(N)
problem. If the O(N) solution *in actual bona fide reality *becomes a
problem for someone's use-case, I'm sure that an O(1) solution can be
implemented
Hello,
This is only to add we've been experiencing exactly the same issue and are
desperately searching for a solution. Can anyone help?
Thanks, Ben
On 8 Mar 2011, at 21:55,
varnish-misc-requ...@varnish-cache.orgmailto:varnish-misc-requ...@varnish-cache.org
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Stewart Robinson wrote:
Whilst this may not be a fix to a possible bug in varnish have you tried
switching posts to pipe instead of pass?
This might well help, but I'd have no way of knowing for sure. The
backend servers indicate the requests via varnish are processed
In message 4d7688a1.8020...@sbgnet.com, David Helkowski writes:
On 3/8/2011 9:53 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In messageaanlktimweic5-+axmjhazpcqyc0huxhgdwaw4+l_6...@mail.gmail.com,
Jona
My anger was due primarily to the statement if you got to deploy a
whole bunch of scary inline C that will
Hi Stefan,
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Caunter, Stefan wrote:
I would look at setting a fail director. Restart if there is a 503, and
if restarts 0 select the patient director with very generous health
checking. Your timeouts are reasonable, but try .timeout 20s and
.threshold 1 for the patient
In message 635787275.835680.1299625799368.javamail.r...@mail-01.sbgnet.com, D
avid Helkowski writes:
Please refrain from continuing to message the list on this topic.
I prefer the archives show the full exchange, should any of your
future potential employers google your name.
If you do not like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 3/9/11 12:50 AM, Johnny Halfmoon wrote:
Are you proposing some kind of 'hushing' algorithm?
Some threads fail silently, whereas other fail verbosely.
- --
UPLEX Systemoptimierung
Schwanenwik 24
22087 Hamburg
http://uplex.de/
Mob:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Per Buer pe...@varnish-software.com wrote:
Hi Drew, list.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Drew Smathers drew.smath...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry to bump my own thread, but does anyone know of a way to set
saintmode if a backend is down, vs. up and misbehaving
Original Message -
From: Johnny Halfmoon jhalfm...@milksnot.com
To: David Helkowski dhelkow...@sbgnet.com
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk, varnish-misc@varnish-cache.org,
Jonathan DeMello demello@googlemail.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2011 6:50:45 PM
Subject: Re: Lots of
As the OP, i would like to get the discussion on this thread back to
something useful. That being said...
Assuming there was an O(1) (or some ideal) mechanism to lookup req.host and
map it to a custom function, i notice that i get the error Unused function
custom_host if there is not an
15 matches
Mail list logo
