Fredrik Nygren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Better suggestions?
Why split the traffic at all, if only to collect it in the same
varnish instance?
--
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen, Linpro
___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mich
ael S. Fischer writes:
(1) Feature request: Can a knob be added to turn down the verbosity of
Varnish logging? Right now on a quad-core Xeon we can service about
14k conn/s, which is good, but I wonder whether we could eke out even
more performance by quelling
(1) Feature request: Can a knob be added to turn down the verbosity of
Varnish logging? Right now on a quad-core Xeon we can service about
14k conn/s, which is good, but I wonder whether we could eke out even
more performance by quelling information that we don't need to log.
(2) HTTP/1.1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Fredrik Nygren
writes:
Because of this I would like Varnish to listen for multiple incoming
ports. Is it possible? I've tried this with no luck:
# varnish -a localhost:81 -a localhost:82 -a localhost:83
I think the syntax is
varnish -a localhost:81
