Re: Number of cached objects

[Poul-Henning Kamp]

In message , Brad 
Schick writes:
>Its not clear to which field is the number of cache entries. Perhaps
>shm_records?

You want n_object

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc

Re: Number of cached objects

[Brad Schick]

On Mar 9, 2010, at 9:30 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> In message , 
> Brad 
> Schick writes:
>> Its not clear to which field is the number of cache entries. Perhaps
>> shm_records?
> 
> You want n_object

Thanks. It would be nice if the output of "varnishstat -l" gave a bit more 
info. Currently the descriptions aren't really any more descriptive than the 
field names. I would not likely have guessed the "N struct object" is the 
number of cached objects. Also unclear what the difference is between sm, sma, 
sms, etc.

-Brad
___
varnish-misc mailing list
varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc