Am Sonntag 16 März 2008 15:54:42 schrieben Sie:
Sascha Ottolski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now my question is: what kind of hardware would I need? Lots of RAM
seems to be obvious, what ever a lot may be...What about the disk
subsystem? Should I look into something like RAID-0 with many disk
Michael,
thanks a lot for taking the time to give me such a detailed answer.
please see my replies below.
Am Sonntag 16 März 2008 18:00:42 schrieb Michael S. Fischer:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Sascha Ottolski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The challenge is to server 20+ million image
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Sascha Ottolski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The challenge is to server 20+ million image files, I guess with
up to 1500 req/sec at peak.
well, wo far I have analyzed the webserver logs of one week. this
indicates that indeed there would be at least
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], C. H
andel writes:
Finally, I would advice you guys to seriously look at flash-disk
drives. The virtual elimination of seektime is just what you want
from a web server or cache.
Having Flash Drives for 400GB of content could kill some budgets ;)
It's a price
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Sascha Ottolski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The challenge is to server 20+ million image files, I guess with up to
1500 req/sec at peak.
A modern disk drive can service 100 random IOPS (@ 10ms/seek, that's
reasonable). Without any caching, you'd need 15 disks to
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Michael S. Fischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know why I'm having such a problem with this. Sigh! I think
I got it right this time.
If I were designing such a service, my choices would be:
Corrections:
(1) 4 machines, each with 4-disk RAID 0
