Hi Michael,
Thank you for looking into this.
On 04-07-17 08:14, Michael Thayer wrote:
Hello Hans,
03.07.2017 20:49, Michael Thayer wrote:
[Discussion of incorrect looking wait code in VBoxGuest.cpp.]>
I did not get any response when I asked around about this. Reading the
code (quite a bit of
Hello Hans,
03.07.2017 20:49, Michael Thayer wrote:
[Discussion of incorrect looking wait code in VBoxGuest.cpp.]>
> I did not get any response when I asked around about this. Reading the
> code (quite a bit of work, as you presumably discovered too; fortunately
> the user-space part is a bit eas
Hello Hans,
03.07.2017 17:21, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So while working on cleaning up the vboxguest driver for mainline
> linux kernel submission (*) I noticed some inconsistent behavior
> wrt vgdrvIoCtl_CancelAllWaitEvents vs vgdrvIoCtl_WaitEvent.
>
> If there are no waiters then vgdrvIo
Hi,
So while working on cleaning up the vboxguest driver for mainline
linux kernel submission (*) I noticed some inconsistent behavior
wrt vgdrvIoCtl_CancelAllWaitEvents vs vgdrvIoCtl_WaitEvent.
If there are no waiters then vgdrvIoCtl_CancelAllWaitEvents
sets pSession->fPendingCancelWaitEvents a
