Gregory Nowak wrote:
of the gpl version in some way, I wouldn't be at all surprised to see
the FSF challenge such a turn of events.
Since the FSF are not copyright holders, I don't think they'd have any
grounds for doing so.
I suspect that if Oracle don't sponsor major engineering in
Fernando Cassia wrote:
I think that if a huge comet strikes the Earth, we will ALL DIE.
Shame, well, I was trying to make a point that GPL code is not immortal
in some way.
Let's try to be adult, huh?
I like vbox and use it as a preferred solution. If it dies, its no big
deal though,
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Immediately terminates with SIGILL – so my earlier laudat was *too*
early, and VirtualBox is *still* broken and unusable for anything
real, unless you have Vanderpool/Pacifica, in which case most are
better off using kvm anyway.
Hmm - seems to run Solaris OK at the
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
James Mansion dixit:
Be nice if it could support NetBSD though. 5.0 still will not install.
Not even in HVM mode? Or doesn't it boot at all, like in Parallels?
Dead stop after the loader gets the initial root. Haven't managed to
find settings that work
James Mansion wrote:
Klaus Espenlaub wrote:
Since this is no trivial thing, it's probably best to open a ticket
in the bug tracker on virtualbox.org. Please attach the exact
configuration info (VBox.log will do), and also a packet trace as
described on http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki
Klaus Espenlaub wrote:
Since this is no trivial thing, it's probably best to open a ticket in
the bug tracker on virtualbox.org. Please attach the exact
configuration info (VBox.log will do), and also a packet trace as
described on http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Network_tips
Ticket is 4064.
I'm trying to PXE boot across an internal network. I load gPXE and all
goes well until it starts trying to load bzImage and initrd files from an
HTTP server.
The server is (X)ubuntu 9.04, running lighttpd or apache2 (same behaviour
with both).
Sometimes - very infrequently - I get high
dick hoogendijk wrote:
The guest editions install fine on Ubuntu 9.04. Shared folders work,
the video driver works, BUT the mouse driver does not work. There is NO
Shared folders don't work for me. Also the video driver didn't pick up
the right resolution on my laptop, I had to hack
Daniel wrote:
Has anybody else had a problem installing Ubuntu 9.04
(ubuntu-9.04-desktop-i386.iso) guest with Virtual box 2.2
(VirtualBox-2.2.0-45846-OSX.dmg) on MacOS 10.5.6 host? The installer
dies halfway through the installation with an error saying something
like, there was a problem
I can't mmount a shared folder with vbox 2.2 (Vista host, assorted Linux
guests including openSUSE 11.1 and Xubuntu 9.04, PUEL).
GAs build OK.
mount.vboxsf says 'protocol error' though. (It does run though, its not
as if the GA installation lied)
Also, I seem to get the VBox GUI hanging
Is it me or some issues with the software?
Had VMWare workstation on my old portable and I could generally install
so that I had an address assigned by a VMWare local DHCP server and also
a local DNS proxy in VMWare which delegates to the DNS server that is
assigned to my portable by my LAN
Hi,
I've been a happy VMWare Workstation user for some time and thought I'd
try VBox because I expected the OpenSolaris guest support to be a bit
better.
And it is - when VBox works at all.
I run a portable with 1.25GB RAM, XPsp3, and a 1.5GHz Pentium-M
processor. Its not shiny and new -
James Mansion wrote:
As I write I have a failed startup in the background. Its using no CPU
at all but is unresponsive and making no progress: it has displayed the
little 'Restoring virtual...' progress meter but that's stuck at 0%.
And - a complete reboot and retry has hung in exactly
13 matches
Mail list logo
