Re: compile troubles

2001-09-04 Thread Vladimir Kabanov
Bill, hello! gcc -I. -Icdb -g -O2 -Wall -c vpopmail.c In file included from /usr/include/sys/wait.h:79, from vpopmail.c:30: /usr/include/bits/waitstatus.h:78: duplicate member `__w_retcode' /usr/include/bits/waitstatus.h:79: duplicate member `__w_coredump'

RE: No user found (4.9.10)

2001-09-04 Thread Shawn Delano
Ok, I feel like a fool now. While browsing through some archives, my eyes caught the tcpserver command which used -u and -g of vpopmail/vchkpw, and it sparked a thought. Low and behold, when I copied over my rc file from the old server to the new server, I forgot the change the uid/gid that

Re[2]: finished vaddaliasdomain() patch

2001-09-04 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Bill, Monday, September 03, 2001, 9:35:39 PM, you wrote: This now works properly, except for the fact that vget_assign (which many of the vpopmail tools rely on) no longer know about this domain. Vuserinfo and vmoduser, for example, can't find the

vpopmail-5.0pre1

2001-09-04 Thread Ken Jones
Hi Folks, The summer is over (here in the US) and it's time we have a new vpopmail-5.0 release to start the year out right. I do not want to add in any new features which require a new round of testing. Any new features can be added to 5.1 (devel version) and later released as a production

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

2001-09-04 Thread Einar Bordewich
- Original Message - From: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:42 PM Subject: vpopmail-5.0pre1 Hi Folks, The summer is over (here in the US) and it's time we have a new vpopmail-5.0 release to start the year out right. I do not

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

2001-09-04 Thread Vladimir Kabanov
Hi Folks, The summer is over (here in the US) and it's time we have a new vpopmail-5.0 release to start the year out right. I do not want to add in any new features which require a new round of testing. Any new features can be added to 5.1 (devel version) and later released as a

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

2001-09-04 Thread sec
Hello , It will be great if you will add spam blocking for certain users. I mean black-lists for certain users. -- Best regards, Yuri mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

2001-09-04 Thread Ken Jones
On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 11:31, Vladimir Kabanov wrote: Hi Folks, The summer is over (here in the US) and it's time we have a new vpopmail-5.0 release to start the year out right. I do not want to add in any new features which require a new round of testing. Any new features can be

Re: Re[2]: finished vaddaliasdomain() patch

2001-09-04 Thread Bill Shupp
on 9/4/01 10:20 AM, Gabriel Ambuehl at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: IMNSHO, the user tools should NOT operate on user@aliasdomain anyway cause an aliasdomain is an aliasdomain and nothing more, the user is user@masterdomain and thus one should work only on the masterdomain. Sounds like I'm in

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

2001-09-04 Thread Ken Jones
On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 11:55, sec wrote: Hello , It will be great if you will add spam blocking for certain users. I mean black-lists for certain users. we are working on a new filtering project http://www.inter7.com/eps/ That should be the building block for filtering on a site/domain

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

2001-09-04 Thread Ken Jones
On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 11:07, Einar Bordewich wrote: - Original Message - From: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:42 PM Subject: vpopmail-5.0pre1 Hi Folks, The summer is over (here in the US) and it's time we have a new

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

2001-09-04 Thread Bill Shupp
on 9/4/01 12:08 PM, Ken Jones at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 11:31, Vladimir Kabanov wrote: Hi Folks, The summer is over (here in the US) and it's time we have a new vpopmail-5.0 release to start the year out right. I do not want to add in any new features which

Re: Re[2]: finished vaddaliasdomain() patch

2001-09-04 Thread Richard A. Secor
Will there at least be something like: b.com is aliased to a.com vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] is aliased to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Rich - Original Message - From: Bill Shupp [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gabriel Ambuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,

Re[4]: finished vaddaliasdomain() patch

2001-09-04 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Bill, Tuesday, September 04, 2001, 7:02:38 PM, you wrote: on 9/4/01 10:20 AM, Gabriel Ambuehl at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: IMNSHO, the user tools should NOT operate on user@aliasdomain anyway cause an aliasdomain is an aliasdomain and nothing more,

Re[4]: finished vaddaliasdomain() patch

2001-09-04 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Tuesday, September 04, 2001, 7:15:21 PM, you wrote: Will there at least be something like: b.com is aliased to a.com vuserinfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] is aliased to [EMAIL PROTECTED] No. Fixing this would most likely involve hacking around in

Re: Re[4]: finished vaddaliasdomain() patch

2001-09-04 Thread Ken Jones
On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 12:25, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Bill, Tuesday, September 04, 2001, 7:02:38 PM, you wrote: on 9/4/01 10:20 AM, Gabriel Ambuehl at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: IMNSHO, the user tools should NOT operate on user@aliasdomain

Re[6]: finished vaddaliasdomain() patch

2001-09-04 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Ken, Tuesday, September 04, 2001, 7:58:05 PM, you wrote: Ken, is vget_assign() used anywhere to do something else than getting dir, uid, gid of the domain to work on? If it isn't it would be ok if it simply returns the values for the masterdomain if

Advisories

2001-09-04 Thread vol
I'd like to comment on the advisory posted below. First of all, this issue is as old as databases and programs that interface with them automatically. Changes to file and library permissions fixes any problems people might have with this as stated in my advisory about valias. The point in my

Re: all fixed up vaddaliasdomain() patch (I hope...)

2001-09-04 Thread Ken Jones
In the future, please post a URL to the patch file instead of posting the patch. Why? Because it eats up our T1 connection deliverying the patch file to everyone on the mailing list. Thanks ken On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 12:59, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

2001-09-04 Thread Bill Shupp
on 9/4/01 12:09 PM, Bill Shupp at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: SMTP blocking (via vmoduser) is something I wouldn't mind seeing in 5.0.. I just implemented smtp auth in production, and could use that sooner than later. ; ) If I get time today, I'll try to extract those changes from

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

2001-09-04 Thread Vladimir Kabanov
SMTP blocking (via vmoduser) is something I wouldn't mind seeing in 5.0.. I just implemented smtp auth in production, and could use that sooner than later. ; ) If I get time today, I'll try to extract those changes from Vladimir's code and submit it as a patch to 5.0pre1. Cheers,

Re: vpopmail-5.0pre1

2001-09-04 Thread Bill Shupp
on 9/4/01 6:27 PM, Vladimir Kabanov at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake: Good day friends! of course thats not completing SMTP blocks, its just a possibility to disable user from sending to someone else using our protected smtp-server. I guess there also could be such possibility as block on

Outbound quota suggestion.

2001-09-04 Thread Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga
Hi all, Forgive me about my english (it's not quite so good!) My idea is: When a user sucessfully authenticates on vchkpw the same schema used to allow roaming users smtping, may be used to put a 'RELAYCLIENT' tag on the same line of the 'allow' tag on the tcp.smtp file. Example:

Re: Outbound quota suggestion.

2001-09-04 Thread Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga
Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] roaming users smtping, may be used to put a 'RELAYCLIENT' tag on the [...] Sorry! Correcting: [...] roaming users smtping, may be used to put a 'DATABYTES' tag on the [...] Now it's right. Best Regards,

Re: Outbound quota suggestion.

2001-09-04 Thread CGI Guru
What?? - Original Message - From: Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 7:58 PM Subject: Re: Outbound quota suggestion. Eduardo Augusto Alvarenga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

sqwebmail3.0.0 and vpopmail4.9.10

2001-09-04 Thread Schiltz Luc
Hi, I installed the mentionned packages and get the following error when compiling sqwebmail : gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/home/vpopmail/include -g -O2 -Wall -I .. -I./.. -c authvchkpw.c authvchkpw.c: In function `auth_vchkpw_changepass': authvchkpw.c:142: warning: assignment from

Re: sqwebmail3.0.0 and vpopmail4.9.10

2001-09-04 Thread Tren Blackburn
Get vpopmail 4.10.32 Tren. On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Schiltz Luc wrote: Hi, I installed the mentionned packages and get the following error when compiling sqwebmail : gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/home/vpopmail/include -g -O2 -Wall -I .. -I./.. -c authvchkpw.c authvchkpw.c: In