Re: [vchkpw] Distribute Qmail + Vpopmail bundle

2008-02-26 Thread ISP Lists
Joshua Megerman wrote: On Saturday 23 February 2008 01:55:14 pm Nick Bright wrote: While the qmail sources are available, it is not GPL. It's my understanding that the way qmail is licensed specifically forbids repackaging. Um, no. As the original poster stated qmail is now in the public

Re: [vchkpw] Distribute Qmail + Vpopmail bundle

2008-02-25 Thread Nick Bright
Joshua Megerman wrote: On Saturday 23 February 2008 01:55:14 pm Nick Bright wrote: While the qmail sources are available, it is not GPL. It's my understanding that the way qmail is licensed specifically forbids repackaging. Um, no. As the original poster stated qmail is now in the public

[vchkpw] Distribute Qmail + Vpopmail bundle

2008-02-23 Thread Serhiy
Hello, Now, when Qmail sources are in public domain don't you think that it makes sense to release not bundle containing Qmail already integrated with vpopmail? You can use qmil sources to build complete mailing solution. Do you have any plans on this? Thanks, -- Serhiy

Re: [vchkpw] Distribute Qmail + Vpopmail bundle

2008-02-23 Thread Nick Bright
While the qmail sources are available, it is not GPL. It's my understanding that the way qmail is licensed specifically forbids repackaging. Serhiy wrote: Hello, Now, when Qmail sources are in public domain don't you think that it makes sense to release not bundle containing Qmail already

Re: [vchkpw] Distribute Qmail + Vpopmail bundle

2008-02-23 Thread Joshua Megerman
On Saturday 23 February 2008 01:55:14 pm Nick Bright wrote: While the qmail sources are available, it is not GPL. It's my understanding that the way qmail is licensed specifically forbids repackaging. Um, no. As the original poster stated qmail is now in the public domain, which means there