Re: [vchkpw] Mysql Threads

2003-11-25 Thread Adam Hooper
X-Istence wrote: Adam Hooper wrote: Many people have used it in more critical applications, and it's up to the task. Slashdot, for instance, or Yahoo! Finance. > Last i checked Slashdot was running PostGreSQL. http://www.mysql.com/press/user_stories/slashdot.html "Naturally, Slashdot has been run

Re: [vchkpw] Mysql Threads

2003-11-24 Thread X-Istence
Adam Hooper wrote: I've never had problems with InnoDB in the past 1-2 years. In one case it's being used for some fairly computationally intense PHP website calculations. Many people have used it in more critical applications, and it's up to the task. Slashdot, for instance, or Yahoo! Finance

Re: [vchkpw] Mysql Threads

2003-11-24 Thread Adam Hooper
I've never had problems with InnoDB in the past 1-2 years. In one case it's being used for some fairly computationally intense PHP website calculations. Many people have used it in more critical applications, and it's up to the task. Slashdot, for instance, or Yahoo! Finance. It's around the s

RE: [vchkpw] Mysql Threads

2003-11-24 Thread Ross Davis - DataAnywhere.net
x27;t you deserve a vacation! -Original Message- From: Erik Bourget [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 4:13 PM To: Adam Hooper Cc: Mandy; VCHKPW Mailinglist Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Mysql Threads Adam Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't quite

Re: [vchkpw] Mysql Threads

2003-11-24 Thread Adam Hooper
I don't quite follow you. Why is it not relational? Note that MySQL's InnoDB table storage supports transactions, row-level locks, and foreign keys. -- Adam Hooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Erik Bourget wrote: Adam Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: They're threads, they share the same memory. So all

Re: [vchkpw] Mysql Threads

2003-11-24 Thread Adam Hooper
They're threads, they share the same memory. So all the MySQL threads are sharing, among them, 10 megs. For an RDBMS, MySQL is quite lightweight. -- Adam Hooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mandy wrote: Hello, I saw, that on the mailserver there are 10 Mysqltreads waiting for requests. Everyone of the us

Re: [vchkpw] Mysql Threads OT

2003-11-24 Thread Mandy
Sorry for the OT. But maybe you can help me elsewhere ;-) This is an output of top. Maybe this help you (and me). Only the Mailsystem is running . 8:09pm up 5 days, 22:00, 0 users, load average: 0,00, 0,02, 0,00 52 processes: 51 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped CPU states: 0,2% user

Re: [vchkpw] Mysql Threads

2003-11-24 Thread Justin Heesemann
On Monday 24 November 2003 19:57, Mandy wrote: > Hello, > > I saw, that on the mailserver there are 10 Mysqltreads waiting for > requests. Everyone of the use 10MB RAM (standard installation of the > rpms) Is this nessesary, our would 2 threads be enought. If yes, > where can i change this ? > Beca