Triple Your Business in 60 Days or Less !!!
Generate traffic to your website by the thousands!!!
Have complete control on who receives your ad.
Get thousands of Targeted visitors!!!
Why it Works.
Because you can deliver your message to
i have a real nice setup going with qmail+vpop(4.10.32)+mysql and everything
seems to be running very nice. i recompiled with --enable-clear-passwd=y
and obviously my authentication went straight to hell because my existing
database tables didn't have the now required pw_clear_passwd field. so i
how can I set the imap admin password needed by
webmail program imp to check for the users quota?
Rob
on 8/9/01 5:55 PM, dan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having issues with getting pop to respond quickly when telneting to
> port 110. It takes up to a minute to get the +OK
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> line.
>
> that box is not running DNS, but DNS response is quick. Is there a
> reverse
Hi,
I'm having issues with getting pop to respond quickly when telneting to
port 110. It takes up to a minute to get the +OK
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> line.
that box is not running DNS, but DNS response is quick. Is there a
reverse lookup being performed in here somewhere?
Here is my qmail-pop3d
Ok.. This is really starting to scold me.
For the last week I have been fighting with courier imap. I
d/l version 1.3.9 and version 0.39 ( from U of Washington) with both various
results.
Running on a Solaris x86 I'm told first that wait is broken.
Come to find out whomever coded the conf
> Is this list archived anywhere so it can be searched?
> If so -- where?
http://www.mail-archive.com/vchkpw@inter7.com/
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 01:03:05PM -0600, Darren Nay wrote:
> Now for
> some reason whenever I send email to ANY of my users it just sits in the
> local queue. It's accepted by SMTP but not delivered. It happens even
> for the users that worked in my original testing.
A very-very-very stupid qu
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 04:36:43PM -0500, Eric Calvert wrote:
> From: "Charles Cazabon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> [ snip ]
> > > > > tcpserver (unless patched) requires IP ADDRESSES.
> > > >
> > > > No longer true. tcpserver accepts hostnames just fine, w