Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz

2007-01-15 Thread Christopher Chan
People has not the courage to say that Bernstein design and coding is horrible. ??? QMAIL was a secure product and a good academic programming model, ten years ago. Now, a modern MTA facing millions of emails has completely different problems from the ones Bernstein faced. But he made a

[vchkpw] chkuser on relay server , part II

2007-01-15 Thread Miki
Hello All especially tonix ;) , well, I see discussion running here ;) but I want move little forward. just my2 cent: qmail is good example of proof of concept which make its own way. Bad luck is that DJB is not working on it, so this nifty features will be slowly lost as more and more patches

[vchkpw] Error: Illegal username

2007-01-15 Thread martin
Preliminary info. vpopmail 5.4.17 OpenBSD 4.0 It's been working for a week or so. I downloaded email from several accounts on Two domains around 08:30 today. My next email check around 09:15 gave me authorization failures on all accounts and domains. qmail is up...I did restarts just in

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz

2007-01-15 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 14.14 15/01/2007, you wrote: People has not the courage to say that Bernstein design and coding is horrible. ??? QMAIL was a secure product and a good academic programming model, ten years ago. Now, a modern MTA facing millions of emails has completely different problems from the ones

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser on relay server , part II

2007-01-15 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Miki, At 15.52 15/01/2007, you wrote: Hello All especially tonix ;) , well, I see discussion running here ;) but I want move little forward. just my2 cent: qmail is good example of proof of concept which make its own way. Bad luck is that DJB is not working on it, so this nifty features will

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser on relay server , part II

2007-01-15 Thread David Chaplin-Loebell
Miki wrote: - so after spending weekend over google ;) I want kindly ask TONIX if he is willing to add smal feature into chkuser 2.0.8, I have idea something like CHECK_EXTERNAL_FILE = 0/1 EXTERNAL_FILE = /bla/bla/list.txt (or even cdb) I second this request-- having this functionality in

[vchkpw] vpopmail max quota of 2GB

2007-01-15 Thread Iulian Liviu Ionescu
Hi, It seems that there's a limit in quota at 2GB. What are the options available to have mail accounts with more than 4 GB quota? Thx, Iulian

Re: [vchkpw] Error: Illegal username

2007-01-15 Thread Tom Collins
On Jan 15, 2007, at 7:19 AM, martin wrote: cd /home/vpopmail/bin ./vpasswd [EMAIL PROTECTED] password Error: Illegal username domain and user still exists. Tried other users in the domain and the second domain It fails with Error: Illegal username on all attempts. Is domain in

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail max quota of 2GB

2007-01-15 Thread Tom Collins
On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:29 AM, Iulian Liviu Ionescu wrote: It seems that there's a limit in quota at 2GB. What are the options available to have mail accounts with more than 4 GB quota? One options: rewrite the Maildir++ patches for qmail and POP/IMAP servers, along with vpopmail's quota

[vchkpw] qmail-smtpd works only without SMTP auth after chkuser patch

2007-01-15 Thread Matthew Washington
Hello everyone, I guess I really have two issues. First, I just recently patched qmail-smtpd according to the manual installation guide [ http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkuser/documentation/installation/manual.html ] and sending works fine, except if authentication is marked in

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz

2007-01-15 Thread Christopher Chan
QMAIL was a secure product and a good academic programming model, ten years ago. Now, a modern MTA facing millions of emails has completely different problems from the ones Bernstein faced. But he made a closed architecture, not a modular one, adding a no-sense license. Hmm...qmail is STILL

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz

2007-01-15 Thread Dave Richardson
Guys, in the interest of advancing the science of vpopmail, would you please consider taking this discussion/argument/difference-of-opinion offline? I'm keenly anxious to see the possible new directions that vpopmail may grow given the several threads of recent activity. Your energy and

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz

2007-01-15 Thread Rick Widmer
Dave Richardson wrote: Guys, in the interest of advancing the science of vpopmail, would you please consider taking this discussion/argument/difference-of-opinion offline? +1 I'm keenly anxious to see the possible new directions that vpopmail may grow given the several threads of recent