:
At 20.57 06/02/2006, you wrote:
Ibiltari wrote:
Thanks for your answer Tonino, i take that solution in account but i
would prefer another solution if possible, that smtp server is being
already used by lots of clients so running another server for them
would imply that they have to change
On 2/7/06, Tonix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 06 February 2006 11:57, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
At 20.31 06/02/2006, you wrote:
Thanks for your answer Tonino, i take that solution in account but i
would prefer another solution if possible, that smtp server is being
already used
Thank you for the solution!! i was out these days and not reading mail
but today i will try the code and lest see how it works...
On 2/11/06, tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12.06 11/02/2006, you wrote:
I'll publish this feature in next chkuser version (and rewrite the code
Hi back,
I tested the code and works as spected no problems for the moment.
thank you very much!
pd: i have also added simscan to my conf and whit a little bit of
effort they work well together also whit the CHKUSER_DISABLE_VARIABLE
modification
On 2/11/06, tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm trying to fine tune my mail system, and looking at how
qmail-smtpd/vchkpw handle rejected mail i started thinking; why
qmail-smtp doesn't disconnect after the intrusion threshold? it keeps
rejecting messages (from the spammer normally) and eating cpu and band
whit. Perhaps there is a good
