of vpopmail (5.4.10) and this issue has
probably been gone. But if not, can somebody explain the different
output?
Regards,
Lars Uhlmann
!DSPAM:4c3338f532711001834612!
Excuse me if this question is already answered (if so just point me
there). Is it possible to tell simscan skip scanning on authenticated
(=relay) connections?
best regards,
Lars
!DSPAM:4948f93d32312016118559!
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:19:32 +0200 tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've noticed some spam sending hosts, which use e.g.
localhost/ 127.0.0.1
as their sender MX. When my mailserver tries to verify the
sending account via bounce check (connecting to 127.0.0.1),
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:55:05 +0300, Cantemir wrote:
[html chunk]
My brain lacks of a HTML parser. If you expect fast help please provide
your question/informations in a suitable way. The common and preferred
content type is and stays 'text/plain'.
/usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.14: no
/var/control/smtproutes
or
/var/qmail/control/smtproutes
If »qmail« is installed under '/var/qmail' then it is
'/var/qmail/control/smtproutes'. The file 'smtproutes' may not exist so
just create it. For a description on how to set routes see the man page
of qmail-remote(8).
HTH
Lars
, RFC1918 or in case of a fqdn is it resolveable at all.
regards,
Lars Uhlmann
We only need this mailbox for »qmailadmin« to log in. Is it possible to
treat this account as non existing? I've tried a domain-global
'.qmail-postmaster' (... bounce-no-mailbox) and a '.qmail' (same content)
inside the folder 'postmaster' but nothing worked.
regards
Lars
On Tue, 09 May 2006 10:47:30 -0400, Michael Krieger wrote:
I'd point you to the RFCs that state that the postmaster must exist and
should accept mail, but since you're asking, you probably don't really
mind.
You're right but I think RFC822 should be worked over. Problems with UBE
and SPAM
On Tue, 09 May 2006 17:18:15 +0200, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Now I'd imagine the main frontline you'd want to investigate is
chkuser.c if you use it. By line 567, it's got a user and domain
split. Under case 10, it actually does the user check, so just have
it test the user for
The Sender-MX-Check needs some enhancements. ;)
Spammers mostly use RFC1918-adresses or unresolveable names as MX-RR, e.g.:
@ IN MX $PRI 127.0.0.1
@ IN MX $PRI has.no.a-record.
@ IN MX $PRI has.rfc1918.a-record.
latest examples (all of the domains below are only used to deliver
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:05:37 +0800, Oliver A. Rojo wrote:
Hi! im trying to add a domain with numbers say 123domain.com. It says:
vpgsql: error creating table '123domain_com': ERROR: syntax error at or
near 1 at character 14
I'm not really familiar with postgresql but iirc table names must
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 09:52:39 -0700
Clayton Weise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this is way off topic, but there are a lot of really smart
people on this list so I'm hoping to get some ideas here. I've got a
web server that has some kind of formmail-esque script that is being
horribly
compile 'chkuser' with CHKUSER_ALWAYS_ON but
have mails with unknown local parts delivered to the target
from.qmail-default instead of rejecting them?
TIA
Lars Uhlmann
13 matches
Mail list logo
