Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz

2007-01-15 Thread Christopher Chan
People has not the courage to say that Bernstein design and coding is horrible. ??? QMAIL was a secure product and a good academic programming model, ten years ago. Now, a modern MTA facing millions of emails has completely different problems from the ones Bernstein faced. But he made a

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz

2007-01-15 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 14.14 15/01/2007, you wrote: People has not the courage to say that Bernstein design and coding is horrible. ??? QMAIL was a secure product and a good academic programming model, ten years ago. Now, a modern MTA facing millions of emails has completely different problems from the ones

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz

2007-01-15 Thread Christopher Chan
QMAIL was a secure product and a good academic programming model, ten years ago. Now, a modern MTA facing millions of emails has completely different problems from the ones Bernstein faced. But he made a closed architecture, not a modular one, adding a no-sense license. Hmm...qmail is STILL

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz

2007-01-15 Thread Dave Richardson
Guys, in the interest of advancing the science of vpopmail, would you please consider taking this discussion/argument/difference-of-opinion offline? I'm keenly anxious to see the possible new directions that vpopmail may grow given the several threads of recent activity. Your energy and

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz

2007-01-15 Thread Rick Widmer
Dave Richardson wrote: Guys, in the interest of advancing the science of vpopmail, would you please consider taking this discussion/argument/difference-of-opinion offline? +1 I'm keenly anxious to see the possible new directions that vpopmail may grow given the several threads of recent

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz

2007-01-11 Thread Alessio Cecchi
Alle 12:31, giovedì 11 gennaio 2007, tonix (Antonio Nati) ha scritto: I'm thinking to extend chkuser, and add an smtp fake delivery for checking recipients existance on end systems (i.e. when domains are external and use me as proxy SMTP). But I'm really tired to fight with qmail. Bernstein

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz

2007-01-11 Thread Michael Krieger
AM Subject: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz I'm thinking to extend chkuser, and add an smtp fake delivery for checking recipients existance on end systems (i.e. when domains are external and use me as proxy SMTP). But I'm really tired to fight with qmail

Re: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz

2007-01-11 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
. Tonino -M - Original Message From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 6:31:40 AM Subject: [vchkpw] Rethinking qmail : was Re: [vchkpw] how use chkuser on dmz I'm thinking to extend chkuser, and add an smtp fake delivery