Rick Widmer wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
See my reply to your other post. If vpopmail can also handle multiple
system user accounts instead of just virtual domain mailboxes under a
single system user...we can integrate with samba and other stuff.
It can. OTOH the main reason I chose
Christopher Chan wrote:
One large factor for me deciding to migrate to dovecot's lda
('deliver') is to use SIEVE, which is under active development and is
likely to become a standard (imho). I see no point in creating another
lda.
Yeah, with SIEVE support being found in Kmail and addons or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher Chan wrote:
What I do see is a need for vpopmail to be able to give 'deliver' any
data it needs to do its job (for instance maildir or mailbox,
destination location, etc). At some point vpopmail might also include
providing SIEVE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher Chan wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Tying these various authentication mechanisms together is a worthy
objective, regardless of the implementation software (mysql vs pgsql
vs ldap). The difficulty in any case is to merge the various
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Shubert wrote:
I agree. The question is, which step further? I hope a little discussion
here will help to clarify that question. Given vpopmail's roots as you
mentioned, I'd like to see vpopmail's focus sharpened, strengthening
it's role in
Christopher Chan wrote:
Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher Chan wrote:
Right now I can use either maildrop or dovecot's lda with postfix. No
injecting into a qmail queue for final delivery into the vpopmail mail
store. Are you saying you would like
Christopher Chan wrote:
I would like to see some discussion about this as well. I think that
examining the role of vpopmail in today's email landscape has merit.
I'm not intimately familiar with vpopmail's history, but I have used
it a bit as part of the qmail-toaster (see
One large factor for me deciding to migrate to dovecot's lda ('deliver')
is to use SIEVE, which is under active development and is likely to
become a standard (imho). I see no point in creating another lda.
Yeah, with SIEVE support being found in Kmail and addons or plugins for
thunderbird
Eric Shubert wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
I would like to see some discussion about this as well. I think that
examining the role of vpopmail in today's email landscape has merit.
I'm not intimately familiar with vpopmail's history, but I have used
it a bit as part of the qmail-toaster
Christopher Chan wrote:
See my reply to your other post. If vpopmail can also handle multiple
system user accounts instead of just virtual domain mailboxes under a
single system user...we can integrate with samba and other stuff.
It can. OTOH the main reason I chose vpopmail is because I
I would like to see some discussion about this as well. I think that
examining the role of vpopmail in today's email landscape has merit. I'm
not intimately familiar with vpopmail's history, but I have used it a
bit as part of the qmail-toaster (see http://www.qmailtoater.com).
vpopmail has
Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher Chan wrote:
Right now I can use either maildrop or dovecot's lda with postfix. No
injecting into a qmail queue for final delivery into the vpopmail mail
store. Are you saying you would like a vpopmail lda for
Christopher,
Will you report your findings here, or at least links to the pertinent
archive posts? I'm curious about this, but not enough so to do the
searching.
Tren Blackburn wrote:
This has been gone over a few times in the past. Search the archives for
the technical reasons. But every
Christopher Chan wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Christopher,
Will you report your findings here, or at least links to the pertinent
archive posts? I'm curious about this, but not enough so to do the
searching.
Which part are you curious about? postfix 'directly' hitting the
vpopmail mail
14 matches
Mail list logo
