On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Brian Kolaci wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, John Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > I am not a programmer but from what I can see this
> > > looks like a clean and very efective way to do the
> > > qmailadmin-limits. If you try to bloat things down
> > > for someth
>
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, John Johnson wrote:
>
> > I am not a programmer but from what I can see this
> > looks like a clean and very efective way to do the
> > qmailadmin-limits. If you try to bloat things down
> > for something that MIGHT be added or changed then
> > we really
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, John Johnson wrote:
> I am not a programmer but from what I can see this
> looks like a clean and very efective way to do the
> qmailadmin-limits. If you try to bloat things down
> for something that MIGHT be added or changed then
> we really will not have things really plann
I am not a programmer but from what I can see this
looks like a clean and very efective way to do the
qmailadmin-limits. If you try to bloat things down
for something that MIGHT be added or changed then
we really will not have things really planned, they
will be half planned and still open waiting
