Jon LaBass wrote:
Jon LaBass wrote:
snip
Compile vpopmail with SPAM_THRESHOLD=10 and any message scored at 10.0
or
above will not be delivered.
Jon
I just upgraded four servers this morning to 5.4.6, that is not a
configure option that I know of. What vpopmail do you use?
DAve
Well, I use
On Friday 17 September 2004 09:02 am, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Jon LaBass wrote:
Jon LaBass wrote:
snip
Compile vpopmail with SPAM_THRESHOLD=10 and any message scored at 10.0
or
above will not be delivered.
Jon
I just upgraded four servers this morning to 5.4.6, that is not a
Ken Jones wrote:
On Friday 17 September 2004 09:02 am, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Jon LaBass wrote:
Jon LaBass wrote:
snip
Compile vpopmail with SPAM_THRESHOLD=10 and any message scored at 10.0
or
above will not be delivered.
Jon
I just upgraded four servers this morning to 5.4.6, that is not a
Jon LaBass wrote:
Jon LaBass wrote:
snip
Compile vpopmail with SPAM_THRESHOLD=10 and any message scored at 10.0
or
above will not be delivered.
Jon
I just upgraded four servers this morning to 5.4.6, that is not a
configure option that I know of. What vpopmail do you use?
Jon LaBass wrote:
snip
Interested in knowing how well it works for you though.
DAve
--
Systems Administrator
http://www.tls.net
Get rid of Unwanted Emails...get TLS Spam Blocker!
It works quite well. I'm surprised you don't take advantage of the FreeBSD
ports. Install vpopmail with the SA flags
I am doing a major upgrade to our mail server and I am looking for
recommendations for programs and qmail patches to limit the amount of
spam that gets through. What are you guys using that has great success?
SPF/RBL/SpamAssassin is a great combo.
I merely flag with SPF and SpamAssassin right now, but I actively
reject based on the ORDB RBL. I've also added some custom SpamAssassin
rules to watch for the SPF flags, and adjust the score accordingly. If
you're interested, I can provide them.
On Thu,
On Thursday 16 September 2004 11:40 am, Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote:
I am doing a major upgrade to our mail server and I am looking for
recommendations for programs and qmail patches to limit the amount of
spam that gets through. What are you guys using that has great success?
I would
Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote:
I am doing a major upgrade to our mail server and I am looking for
recommendations for programs and qmail patches to limit the amount of
spam that gets through. What are you guys using that has great success?
SpamAssassin without a doubt. Depending on how much
Oh, yes. I have to second the ClamAV (or /any/ antivirus, really).
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:58:13 -0500, Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 16 September 2004 11:40 am, Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote:
I am doing a major upgrade to our mail server and I am looking for
Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote:
I am doing a major upgrade to our mail server and I am looking for
recommendations for programs and qmail patches to limit the amount of
spam that gets through. What are you guys using that has great success?
I forget to add we also use spamcop, but not in
-
From: Matthew Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 7:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection
Oh, yes. I have to second the ClamAV (or /any/ antivirus, really).
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:58:13 -0500, Ken Jones
I forget to add we also use spamcop, but not in SpamAssassin, I let
qmail do it. I would also highly recommend the SURBL in
SpamAssassin. If
I use no other tests, SURBL would catch 70% of my current caught spam.
what is SURBL? have you an URL?
Jan
Courtesy of Google:
http://www.google.com/search?q=SURBLsourceid=firefoxstart=0start=0ie=utf-8oe=utf-8
- Chris
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:31:01 +0200, Jan Lange
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I forget to add we also use spamcop, but not in SpamAssassin, I let
qmail do it. I would also highly
http://www.surbl.org/
We use it here too (Also a public DNS server for them), by far
the best spam filtering we do.
A would recommend again :-)
Regards,
Joe Boyce
---
InterStar, Inc. - Shasta.com Internet
Phone: +1 (530) 224-6866 x105
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, September 16,
Message-
From: Matthew Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 7:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection
Oh, yes. I have to second the ClamAV (or /any/ antivirus, really).
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:58:13
-Original Message-
From: Jon LaBass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection
Hi,
how can I use SA global in qmail, with dropping of Mails that
have more than 10
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection
Oh, yes. I have to second the ClamAV (or /any/ antivirus, really).
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:58:13 -0500, Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 16 September 2004 11:40 am, Andrew
Niemantsverdriet wrote:
I am doing a major
Jon LaBass wrote:
snip
Compile vpopmail with SPAM_THRESHOLD=10 and any message scored at 10.0 or
above will not be delivered.
Jon
I just upgraded four servers this morning to 5.4.6, that is not a
configure option that I know of. What vpopmail do you use?
DAve
--
Systems Administrator
spam, The XBL/SBL stops MORE THAN HALF of our
incoming mail.
http://www.spamhaus.org
Brian
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Niemantsverdriet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 9:40 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] Recomendations for best spam rejection
I am
Jon LaBass wrote:
snip
Compile vpopmail with SPAM_THRESHOLD=10 and any message scored at 10.0
or
above will not be delivered.
Jon
I just upgraded four servers this morning to 5.4.6, that is not a
configure option that I know of. What vpopmail do you use?
DAve
--
Systems
21 matches
Mail list logo
