It's based on the return code from spamc.
Exitcode is 1 if the message is spam, 0 if not spam.
The threshold is based on your local required_hits configuration.
I guess we could write in code to support how you are doing it.
Ken
On Saturday 31 July 2004 07:52 pm, Rick romero wrote:
> I don't hav
Hello Rick,
Rick romero wrote on Sat, 31 Jul 2004 19:52:43 -0500 UTC:
Rr> I don't have a copy, and don't have time to test right now, but is the
Rr> rejection based on the score, or the Yes/No?
Rr> Currently, I'm sending anything over 15 to /dev/null via a maildrop
Rr> script, but 5 is marked as
I don't have a copy, and don't have time to test right now, but is the
rejection based on the score, or the Yes/No?
Currently, I'm sending anything over 15 to /dev/null via a maildrop
script, but 5 is marked as spam..
Rick
On Jul 31, 2004, at 6:40 PM, Ken Jones wrote:
Sure, some other folks sug
Sure, some other folks suggested the same option.
Perhaps a configuration option to decide to reject or just process
Ken
On Saturday 31 July 2004 03:03 pm, Bastiaan van der Put wrote:
> Ken,
>
> Is it possible to scan for spam and use "tagging" only, not rejecting the
> msg?
>
> Greetings, Bas
>
Ken,
Is it possible to scan for spam and use "tagging" only, not rejecting the msg?
Greetings, Bas
At 19:43 7/29/2004, you wrote:
Here you go
Ken
The installation instructions are in the INSTALL file
On Thursday 29 July 2004 12:18 pm, Shane Chrisp wrote:
> Please send me a copy Ken.
>
>
> cheers
>
> Also I was wondering if there is a way to tell qmail-smtpd to exit
> with a 5xx error code rather than a 4xx error on spam or a virus?
> I am running qmail out of supervise, not that it should make any
> difference that I can see.
Look at the end of qmail.c in the qmail distribution.
The exit co
TECTED]
>Sent: Friday, 30 July 2004 1:44 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [vchkpw] simscan test release: simplified scanner
>for clamav/spamassassin
>
>Here you go
>
>Ken
>
>The installation instructions are in the INSTALL file
>
>
>On Thursday 29 July
Please send me a copy Ken.
cheers
Shane
>-Original Message-
>From: Ken Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, 28 July 2004 1:57 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [vchkpw] simscan test release: simplified scanner for
>clamav/spamassassin
>
>
>Anyone interested in trying
Ken Jones schrieb:
Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
It is a simplified replacement for qscanq.
We have been running it on our server for over a week and it is solid.
Like qscanq it can call clamdscan to check for viri.
It is invoked via the QMAILQUEUE patch.
Differences:
Pe data de Tuesday 27 July 2004 20:57, Ken Jones a scris:
> Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
> It is a simplified replacement for qscanq.
> We have been running it on our server for over a week and it is solid.
> Like qscanq it can call clamdscan to check for viri.
> It is i
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:57:20 -0500, Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
Can you send it to me ? I will love to try it.
--
Regards Manny
"Unix is simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity."
- Dennis Ritchie
pelase send for me.
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 2:57 PM
Subject: [vchkpw] simscan test release: simplified scanner for
clamav/spamassassin
Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
It is a
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
Yes, definitely interested!
Ken Jones wrote:
Anyone interested in trying simscan before I release it?
If you are interested, please email me directly and I'll send you a tar ball.
Absolutely. I'd love to test it on our test mail machine. :)
Thanks in advance!
Chris Kalin
14 matches
Mail list logo
