On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 06:01 -0700, Tom Collins wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2009, at 7:32 PM, Rick Romero wrote:
> > What I'm trying to work around with this method is to handle
> > user-specific .qmail directives. Dovecot doesn't do that, and that is
> > why I can't full out replace vdelivermail with deli
On Mar 30, 2009, at 7:32 PM, Rick Romero wrote:
What I'm trying to work around with this method is to handle
user-specific .qmail directives. Dovecot doesn't do that, and that is
why I can't full out replace vdelivermail with deliver.
What if vpopmail was updated to store a user's .qmail file
You're right, sorry. I misunderstood where you were trying to do this.
t.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Romero [mailto:r...@havokmon.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 5:28 AM
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Subject: RE: [vchkpw] vdelivermail stdout to Dovecot deli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Romero wrote:
> vdelivermail already has a 'run_command' function for running .qmail
> commands, I'm going to try using that next to call deliver. That should
> solve the chained pipe issue.
I'll admit that I'm not very familiar with the issues
sue). Maildrop can be
> setup to handle any circumstance you have to deal with and just defer
> delivery until the problem is resolved without causing mail loss.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Tren
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rick Romero [mailto:r...@havokmon.com]
>
ould be worth doing in the case of
> dovecot, but it helped me get around some of the same issues with
> dSPAM, and ensure that mail was never lost.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Tren
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Rick Romero [mailto:r..
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Manvendra Bhangui wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Rick Romero wrote:
>
>> Programming question - if I write to fd0 (STDOUT), and then exec() a
>> process, will that child process see the data I put in fd0 from the parent?
>> Maybe I'll just try that as
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Rick Romero wrote:
> Programming question - if I write to fd0 (STDOUT), and then exec() a
> process, will that child process see the data I put in fd0 from the parent?
> Maybe I'll just try that as well.
>
make fd0 a file (using makeseekable) and do lseek (0, 0
erfectly.
>
> I'm not sure if this method would be worth doing in the case of dovecot, but
> it helped me get around some of the same issues with dSPAM, and ensure that
> mail was never lost.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tren
>
> > -----Original Message-
> &g
> -Original Message-
> From: Cleaver, Japheth [mailto:jclea...@soe.sony.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 12:16 PM
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Subject: RE: [vchkpw] vdelivermail stdout to Dovecot deliver
>
> > -Original Message-
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Tren Blackburn [mailto:t...@eotnetworks.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 11:55 AM
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Subject: RE: [vchkpw] vdelivermail stdout to Dovecot deliver
>
> I have a question about this. When I first implemented dS
]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 10:37 AM
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vdelivermail stdout to Dovecot deliver
>
>
> Ok. This won't work. My test system had all the variables set in the
> shell, which is why it worked. :( The reason it won't work
Ok. This won't work. My test system had all the variables set in the
shell, which is why it worked. :( The reason it won't work is that
qmail-local is the parent process of both vdelivermail AND deliver.
If vdelivermail sets HOME, it does not apply to deliver's environment.
:(
On t
13 matches
Mail list logo
