Re: smtp-auth / vpopmail

2001-05-31 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
I want to do that, and in the future I'll extend my patch (checkusers on qmail-smtpd) or write a new one, but I've not studied actual patches nor I've time to do it in near future. Tonino At 31/05/2001 31/05/2001 +0100, Kieran Barnes wrote: Does anybody have any implementation of, or plans

RE: smtp-auth / vpopmail

2001-05-31 Thread Jonas Pasche
hi there, i'm using authenticated smtp for over a year now, and it works great. what you should now is that there are three different authentication types: PLAIN, LOGIN and CRAM-MD5. here is a nice table on what clients and other mailservers are supporting authenticated smtp:

Re: smtp-auth / vpopmail

2001-05-31 Thread Ondej Sur
"Chris Bolt" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: vchkpw can be used as a drop-in replacement for checkpassword. If it supports checkpassword, it should work with vchkpw. You may just have to make vchkpw suid vpopmail:vchkpw. Be aware that when you make vchkpw suid vpopmail.vchkpw you have to add

Re: smtp-auth / vpopmail

2001-05-31 Thread Ondej Sur
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ondej Sur) writes: Jonas Pasche [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: as chris bolt correctly stated, vchkpw has to be suid, but suid vpopmail unfortunately is not enough; it has to be suid root (ken jones told me that long time ago), This is *not* true! I have vchkpw running suid

Re: smtp-auth / vpopmail

2001-05-31 Thread Jonas Pasche
hi there, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ondøej Surý) writes: Jonas Pasche [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: as chris bolt correctly stated, vchkpw has to be suid, but suid vpopmail unfortunately is not enough; it has to be suid root (ken jones told me that long time ago), This is *not* true! I have