Re: [vchkpw] Mailer-Daemon Message Sizes

2003-04-05 Thread Justin Heesemann
On Saturday 05 April 2003 00:55, Wil Hatfield - HVHM Customer Care wrote: I am sure Is there a way to chop the size of Postmaster and Mailer-Daemon messages? When a user gets an over quota bounce or any other bounce for that matter and there is an attachment the bounce is HUGE. Limiting it to

[vchkpw] qmail-smtpd check for valid user/over quota with vpopmail api

2003-04-05 Thread Ken Jones
I read on the qmail list last week that someone switched from qmail to postfix (or something else, I don't remember) because qmail-smtpd doesn't support checking for valid users. I added those features to qmail-smtpd this morning using two vpopmail functions. One to check if the user exists and

Re: [vchkpw] API call failing to detect errors

2003-04-05 Thread Ken Jones
Probably the orginal programmer didn't have time to do a complete review, and no one has investigated it. KenJones On Thursday 03 April 2003 14:58, James H. Thompson wrote: I noticed that when using the API and adding a new domain, there are cases where no error is returned even though the

[vchkpw] Re: vdelivermail and bounced messages

2003-04-05 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Chris, On Friday, April 4, 2003 at 10:25:35 PM you wrote (at least in part): Are you sure the _bounce_ gets directed and delivered to $SENDER _AND_ postmaster? Usually postmaster only gets double-bounces, stating ... but the bounce bounced. ... in the very beginning of the mail. [...]

Re: [vchkpw] qmail-smtpd check for valid user/over quota with vpopmail api

2003-04-05 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Hi Ken, why are you ignoring my patch at www.interazioni.it/qmail? You know it exists and works, so I don't understand why you continue to ignore it and prefer to post a rough (and poor) one. Tonino At 05/04/03 05/04/03 -0600, Ken Jones wrote: I read on the qmail list last week that someone

Re: [vchkpw] qmail-smtpd check for valid user/over quota with vpopmail api

2003-04-05 Thread Ken Jones
I didn't know you had one. Ken On Saturday 05 April 2003 11:03, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Hi Ken, why are you ignoring my patch at www.interazioni.it/qmail? You know it exists and works, so I don't understand why you continue to ignore it and prefer to post a rough (and poor) one.