Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail 5.4.2 released

2004-02-23 Thread Alexander Bruns
Hi, http://vpopmail.sf.net/ 5.4.2 - released 22-Feb-04 On the Homepage at sourceforge of vpopmail, there 5.4.0 is stable and 5.4.2 is development. Which version schould be running on production systems? Is 5.4.2 only a bugfix-release or really a development-release? Greetings Alexander

[vchkpw] unable to parse this line

2004-02-23 Thread lists
Hi all, I've recently been seeing a number of error messages in my qmail send logs, which relate to messages with multiple recipients. The email being sent gets delivered to some of the users on the list but not all. I've checked and doublechecked that the accounts are valid, but can't find any

Re: [vchkpw] PHP extension for vpopmail

2004-02-23 Thread Marcin Soltysiak
o Start a separate instance of Apache on its own port or IP address, running as the mail user. This instance should only serve mail related pages. This is very easy to do. o Don't allow any web sites on the mail server. Only run QmailAdmin and sqWebmail on the mail server, and

Re: [vchkpw] PHP extension for vpopmail

2004-02-23 Thread Marcin Soltysiak
Another problem, if you allow the www user access to the vpopmail programs - how do you keep every web site on the server from having full access to mail system? The vpopmail library functions don't provide authentication. (They do provide functions for doing authentication, but the calling

Re: [vchkpw] unable to parse this line

2004-02-23 Thread J. Kendzorra
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: can't find any clues as to why its failing. I'm not even sure whether this is a vpopmail issue or a qmail-inject problem. It's a qmail-inject/headers problem - the header seems broken. You may want to try new-inject (http://cr.yp.to/mess822.html) and/or change the headers.

Re: [vchkpw] PHP extension for vpopmail

2004-02-23 Thread Rick Widmer
Marcin Soltysiak wrote: Another problem, if you allow the www user access to the vpopmail programs - how do you keep every web site on the server from having full access to mail system? The vpopmail library functions don't provide authentication. (They do provide functions for doing

Re: [vchkpw] PHP extension for vpopmail

2004-02-23 Thread Marcin Soltysiak
Another problem, if you allow the www user access to the vpopmail programs - how do you keep every web site on the server from having full access to mail system? The vpopmail library functions don't provide authentication. (They do provide functions for doing authentication, but the calling

Re: [vchkpw] unable to parse this line

2004-02-23 Thread Jeff Koch
Maybe I'm wrong but I do not think there should be spaces between email addresses. At 05:47 AM 2/23/2004, you wrote: Hi all, I've recently been seeing a number of error messages in my qmail send logs, which relate to messages with multiple recipients. The email being sent gets delivered to

RE: [vchkpw] unable to parse this line

2004-02-23 Thread Shane Chrisp
I would suggest upgrading vpopmail to 5.4.0 at the very least. At 05:47 AM 2/23/2004, you wrote: Hi all, I've recently been seeing a number of error messages in my qmail send logs, which relate to messages with multiple recipients. The email being sent gets delivered to some of the users on

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail 5.4.2 released

2004-02-23 Thread Tom Collins
On Feb 23, 2004, at 2:43 AM, Alexander Bruns wrote: On the Homepage at sourceforge of vpopmail, there 5.4.0 is stable and 5.4.2 is development. Which version schould be running on production systems? Is 5.4.2 only a bugfix-release or really a development-release? Well, 5.4.1 and 5.4.2 were

[vchkpw] Wierd RBLSMTPD issue

2004-02-23 Thread Joe Boyce
Hello, Not really a vpopmail thing, but I figure it wouldn't hurt to ask here. We use a dialup accelerator that the provider we buy dialup modems provides for us. Due to the amount of people using this proxy, which also proxies email requests, it sometimes get's listed in one of our blacklists

[vchkpw] vdominfo problem..

2004-02-23 Thread Brian
Hey all, 5.4.0 here.. cd /usr/local/vpopmail/domains; for i in `ls`; do vdominfo $i; done.. and just looking at the output.. and I found some *strange* things.. domain: melodylodge.com uid:89 gid:89 dir:/usr/local/vpopmail/domains/melodylodge.com users: 0 domain: fchp-inc.org uid:

[vchkpw] Make error on Solaris 9

2004-02-23 Thread Joseph Bruzzo
Hi to all, I am trying to compile vpopmail-5.4.0 on a SUN Ultra 5 running Solaris 9 with all the security and recommended patches. But I keep on getting this error that for the life of me I can not figure it out. Can anyone help??? my Configuration options are as follows: bash-2.05# crle -c

[vchkpw] Problems with roaming/open smtp?

2004-02-23 Thread Marc Nicholas
Hi all... Recently installed vpopmail-5.2.2 on a Redhat 9 system. Working wonderfully apart from the 'roaming' feature. Config.status reports that the roaming option is enabled...yet my smtp.tcp file doesn't get rebuilt with the Ips of roamers... Anyone got any clues on to how to debug or fix

Re: [vchkpw] Wierd RBLSMTPD issue

2004-02-23 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 11:09, Joe Boyce wrote: However, we do have the IP in question listed in our tcp.smtp file like this: 66.81.0.10:allow,RBLSMTPD=,RELAYCLIENT= It also matches in the cdb file too. I've checked my run command and the correct tcp.smtp.cdb file is being looked at.

[vchkpw] CRAM-MD5 smtp-auth vpopmail-5.4.0 and spamcontrol-2.2.9

2004-02-23 Thread Yuri Nosyrev
Hi, vchkpw-list CRAM-MD5 smtp-auth method seems to be not working under my installation of vpopmail-5.4.0 (mysql-4.0.18 as a back-end)/ spamcontrol-2.2.9 at the same time PLAIN smtp-auth is working fine As far as I know, qmail have to use the latest qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.2 patch to work with

Re: [vchkpw] CRAM-MD5 smtp-auth vpopmail-5.4.0 and spamcontrol-2.2.9

2004-02-23 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 22:58, Yuri Nosyrev wrote: [snip can't do cram-md5 with vpopmail 5.4.0 with mysql] Is there any known troubles with CRAM-MD5 authentication method at vpopmail-5.4.0 (cause I've heard about misfunctioning of this smtp-auth method at vpopmail-5.4.0-rc1) ? I know for a

[vchkpw] question

2004-02-23 Thread aki
Sir, I do not understand this log message here; /// Feb 22 09:32:54 ns qmail: 1077409974.518163 info msg 3670324: bytes 1742 from qp 24127 uid 507 Feb 22 09:32:54 ns qmail: 1077409974.700893 starting delivery 82: msg 3670324 to

RE: [vchkpw] question

2004-02-23 Thread Shane Chrisp
You will notice the message has come from which means its likely a bounce message. Without turning on more logging it's a little hard to say for certain. Shane -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2004 2:42 PM To: [EMAIL

Re: [vchkpw] question

2004-02-23 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 00:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sir, I do not understand this log message here; /// Feb 22 09:32:54 ns qmail: 1077409974.518163 info msg 3670324: bytes 1742 from qp 24127 uid 507 Feb 22 09:32:54 ns qmail: 1077409974.700893

Re: [vchkpw] CRAM-MD5 smtp-auth vpopmail-5.4.0 and spamcontrol-2.2.9

2004-02-23 Thread Jeff Koch
CRAM-MD5 (both with and without MySQL) breaks if you are using Eudora as a mail client but otherwise works fine with Outlook and Outlook Express. Over the last several days we have built three mailservers using Bill's Toaster without mysql and also modified to use mysql. In each case we have

RE: [vchkpw] CRAM-MD5 smtp-auth vpopmail-5.4.0 and spamcontrol-2.2.9

2004-02-23 Thread David Hubbard
From: Jeff Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CRAM-MD5 (both with and without MySQL) breaks if you are using Eudora as a mail client but otherwise works fine with Outlook and Outlook Express. Neither of those does cram-md5, they talk auth login. David

Re: [vchkpw] CRAM-MD5 smtp-auth vpopmail-5.4.0 and spamcontrol-2.2.9

2004-02-23 Thread Yuri Nosyrev
Neither of those does cram-md5, they talk auth login. Yes, they doesn't I tried both KMail and Evolution... without success they both discovered PLAIN, LOGIN and CRAM-MD5 smtp-auth method available, but can't use CRAM-MD5... and yes, as Jeremy Kitchen said: it's not life or death but really

RE: [vchkpw] CRAM-MD5 smtp-auth vpopmail-5.4.0 and spamcontrol-2.2.9

2004-02-23 Thread Jeff Koch
What you say may be true. But I can tell you from our experience that Eudora cannot smtp authenticate unless cram-md5 is 'undef' in qmail-smtpd.c whereas Outlook can. At 02:17 AM 2/24/2004, you wrote: From: Jeff Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CRAM-MD5 (both with and without MySQL) breaks if