After install Qmail 1.3 is OK, using system account is very good (send
receive), I continue installing vpopmail.
I do:
# groupadd -g 89 vchkpw
# useradd -g vchkpw -u 89 vpopmail
# mkdir -p /home/vpopmail
# chown vpopmail.vchkpw /home/vpopmail
# cd /usr/local/src/vpopmail-5.4.0
# ./configure
#
On Monday 06 February 2006 11:57, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
At 20.31 06/02/2006, you wrote:
Thanks for your answer Tonino, i take that solution in account but i
would prefer another solution if possible, that smtp server is being
already used by lots of clients so running another server for
On Monday 06 February 2006 09:36, Ibiltari wrote:
Hi, i have a working qmail installation from netqmail and recently
included chkuser (very nice!).
I want to use the CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT and CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT
variables to block spam because they work very nice in my system, but
the problem
mmm but is not harder to mantain a server whit 2 smtp server runing
together? i think i would prefer the other method anyway. And by the
way, it could be a nice feature to add to chkuser? somthing like
CHKUSER_NOCHECKS_VARIABLE RELAYCLIENT
I think this is besides chkuser.
Consider with two
Thanks Abel, but I dont have just one IP of spammer buts a lot of Kind, and have
networks with the ip is Dynamic.
Regards,
Thiago
On -1 xxx -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I have one qmail with double-boucetrim.patch, bigconcurrency,rcptchecks
with
tarpit and tarpit palomine patches
On Monday 06 February 2006 08:45, Tom Collins wrote:
On Feb 6, 2006, at 4:14 AM, N0K wrote:
I have using vpopmail-5.4.13, qmail + smtp-auth
(http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/dist/qmail-smtpd-
auth-0.31.tar.gz).
Do i need to patch vchkpw or any similar things ?
On 2006-02-07, at 0623, N0K wrote:
Hello, and thanks for the reply, i have quit smtp auth old patch
and i have patched with vpopmail/contrib patch, but now, i get the
next error:
tsuki:/var/qmail/supervise# telnet localhost 25
...
AUTH LOGIN
334 VXNlcm5hbWU6
On 2006-02-07, at 0214, Adam Ossenford wrote:
I was able to integrate your qmail-1.03-jms1.6c patch and the qmail
tap patch successfully.
did you do mine first and then qmailtap, or the other way around? did
the patch apply cleanly or were there any rejects which had to be
handled
Thanks for the answer
qmail-smtpd is trying to run the checkpassword program, and can't.
check the permissions on your checkpassword program (specified on
your qmail-smtpd command line- if the example you sent is accurate,
this will be /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw.) and here's the part a
On 2006-02-07, at 0703, N0K wrote:
For the moment only want see smtp auth run.
But the result is the same:
tsuki:/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd# telnet localhost 25
...
auth login
334 VXNlcm5hbWU6
Cgp0b2xerylQHRlcF3QuY29t
334 UGFzc3dvcmQ6
CgasoxMaajMw
454 oops, unable to write pipe and
John Simpson wrote:
On 2006-02-07, at 0703, N0K wrote:
For the moment only want see smtp auth run.
But the result is the same:
tsuki:/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd# telnet localhost 25
...
auth login
334 VXNlcm5hbWU6
Cgp0b2xerylQHRlcF3QuY29t
334 UGFzc3dvcmQ6
CgasoxMaajMw
454 oops,
On 2006-02-07, at 0759, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Just an FYI to the original poster, the new patch does not require
the host name in the run file of qmail-smtpd. If it is there, it
will make you an open relay. It's not part of the problem above I
believe but I thought you should be made
John Simpson wrote:
On 2006-02-07, at 0759, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Just an FYI to the original poster, the new patch does not require the
host name in the run file of qmail-smtpd. If it is there, it will
make you an open relay. It's not part of the problem above I believe
but I thought
Rick Macdougall wrote:
John Simpson wrote:
On 2006-02-07, at 0759, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Just an FYI to the original poster, the new patch does not require
the host name in the run file of qmail-smtpd. If it is there, it
will make you an open relay. It's not part of the problem above
On -1 xxx -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Abel, but I dont have just one IP of spammer buts a lot of Kind,
a combination of spamassassin + simscan with rejection at smtp level
could help you
and have networks with the ip is Dynamic.
use rblsmtpd with well functional DNSBL lists like
N0K wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
John Simpson wrote:
On 2006-02-07, at 0759, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Just an FYI to the original poster, the new patch does not require
the host name in the run file of qmail-smtpd. If it is there, it
will make you an open relay. It's not part of the
2006/2/7, 褚永锋 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \
It seems you have your pop3d running with wrong user:
# ps aux | grep pop3
and
# ls -l ~vpopmail/domains/test.com/vpasswd*
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian FreeBSD User Group
http://www.gufi.org/
Perhaps try Bill's toaster patch instead. http://www.shupp.org
Rick
u i was using qmail-1.03, now i have install netqmail-1.05 for
toaster patch, i have patch with this patch and still!!! get the same
error :(
Any other idea ?
Regards.
did you do mine first and then qmailtap, or the other way around? did
the patch apply cleanly or were there any rejects which had to be
handled manually?
Actually, I had tried do install both patches one after the other and was
not able to ever get it to work. The two patches had a couple
N0K wrote:
Perhaps try Bill's toaster patch instead. http://www.shupp.org
Rick
u i was using qmail-1.03, now i have install netqmail-1.05 for
toaster patch, i have patch with this patch and still!!! get the same
error :(
Any other idea ?
No, sorry. I use Bill's patch all
Hi,
I've been using vpopmail for quite some time now and worked fine all
this time.
I'm using vpopmail version 5.4.13 and maildrop version 1.6.3.
However, recently I modified the virtual domains .qmail-default file and
added this :
| /var/qmail/bin/preline /usr/local/bin/maildrop
It is
Rick Macdougall wrote:
N0K wrote:
Perhaps try Bill's toaster patch instead. http://www.shupp.org
Rick
u i was using qmail-1.03, now i have install netqmail-1.05 for
toaster patch, i have patch with this patch and still!!! get the same
error :(
Any other idea ?
No,
On Feb 7, 2006, at 12:25 AM, 褚永锋 wrote:
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l 0 0 110 \
For starters, try a higher softlimit (like 1000).
You should also include the user and group to run as (add -u89 -g89 to
your tcpserver parameters)
--
Tom
On 2/5/06, Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's probably a problem elsewhere in the maildirquota code, where we
use an unsigned long instead of a long.
Sounds good to me, I'll be back in there today as...
When you made the change, did the problem go away?
It seems to have made it
Hey, I love you people, but I need to move it to another account
--
James McMillan, CIO
The NetMark Consulting Group
www.thenetmark.com
888.767.8750 x106
On 2/7/2006 8:36 PM +0200, James McMillan wrote:
Hey, I love you people, but I need to move it to another account
Take a look at the headers of the mails this list sents.
Niek Baakman
I tried that... :(
Niek wrote:
On 2/7/2006 8:36 PM +0200, James McMillan wrote:
Hey, I love you people, but I need to move it to another account
Take a look at the headers of the mails this list sents.
Niek Baakman
--
James McMillan, CIO
The NetMark Consulting Group
James McMillan wrote:
Hey, I love you people, but I need to move it to another account
Use the headers Luke!
List-Post: mailto:vchkpw@inter7.com
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Hey Rick,
Thanks, but I've sent an email to List-Unsubscribe:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3 times now...
me thinks ezmlm is borked? Or something.
Jimmy
Rick Macdougall wrote:
James McMillan wrote:
Hey, I love you people, but I need to move it to another account
Use the headers
On 2/7/2006 9:08 PM +0100, James McMillan wrote:
Hey Rick,
Thanks, but I've sent an email to List-Unsubscribe:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3 times now...
me thinks ezmlm is borked? Or something.
Jimmy
You have to send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using the email address
you used when you signed up
Hi,
(if your Q has not been answered ...).
At 12:23 07.02.2006 +0100, you wrote:
On Monday 06 February 2006 08:45, Tom Collins wrote:
On Feb 6, 2006, at 4:14 AM, N0K wrote:
I have using vpopmail-5.4.13, qmail + smtp-auth
Ah ha, that was it... I've been using an alias address for the past year
and I forgot what the original address was. LOL, thanks
Sorry for rotting up the mailinglist.
Niek wrote:
On 2/7/2006 9:08 PM +0100, James McMillan wrote:
Hey Rick,
Thanks, but I've sent an email to
On 2/7/06, Tonix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 06 February 2006 11:57, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
At 20.31 06/02/2006, you wrote:
Thanks for your answer Tonino, i take that solution in account but i
would prefer another solution if possible, that smtp server is being
already used
On Monday 06 February 2006 19:22, John Simpson wrote:
On 2006-02-06, at 1620, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
i'm thinking about possibly including the qmailtap patch in my
combined
patch file. however, the biggest problem i've seen from people using
QUEUE_EXTRA is that they set up loops when they
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 03:23, N0K wrote:
454 oops, unable to write pipe and I can't auth (#4.3.0)
exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 400 /usr/bin/tcpserver -H -R -l 0 -c
$MAXSMTPD -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd fujitsu.es
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 04:59, Rick Macdougall wrote:
John Simpson wrote:
On 2006-02-07, at 0703, N0K wrote:
For the moment only want see smtp auth run.
But the result is the same:
tsuki:/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd# telnet localhost 25
...
auth login
334
On Monday 06 February 2006 21:09, Rizwan Iqbal Malik wrote:
Dear All,
We wish to enforce pass word policy on the users of our mail system . Can
it be done using Vpopmail. Common policy include changing password on first
logon etc...
I've actually considered doing this in the past. I
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 09:39, Tom Collins wrote:
On Feb 7, 2006, at 12:25 AM, 褚永锋 wrote:
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l 0 0 110 \
For starters, try a higher softlimit (like 1000).
You should also include the user and group to run
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 12:51, James McMillan wrote:
Ah ha, that was it... I've been using an alias address for the past year
and I forgot what the original address was. LOL, thanks
if you look at the Return-Path header (assuming your MTA has set it for you)
it will tell you what the
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 04:59, Rick Macdougall wrote:
John Simpson wrote:
On 2006-02-07, at 0703, N0K wrote:
For the moment only want see smtp auth run.
But the result is the same:
tsuki:/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd# telnet localhost 25
...
auth login
334
On Feb 7, 2006, at 4:59 PM, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Monday 06 February 2006 21:09, Rizwan Iqbal Malik wrote:
Dear All,
We wish to enforce pass word policy on the users of our mail system .
Can
it be done using Vpopmail. Common policy include changing password on
first
logon etc...
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 17:42, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 04:59, Rick Macdougall wrote:
John Simpson wrote:
On 2006-02-07, at 0703, N0K wrote:
For the moment only want see smtp auth run.
But the result is the same:
DH Jon,
Wednesday, January 25, 2006, 2:48:41 AM, you wrote:
JS Tracked down a bug that was causing our users to exceed their quota
JS without any mail in their boxes.
--- hi Jon, i'm facing the same problem too here, some of users always exceeded
their quota without any email in their mail
43 matches
Mail list logo
