Re: [vchkpw] troubles with vpopbull: users disappeared

2003-07-23 Thread John Simpson
files created by older versions. if nothing else, a quick perl script can do this. i may write one, if somebody can send me a sample of what the old format vpasswd file looks like (all of my boxes are running 5.2.1 right now.) -- --- | John Simpson

Re: [vchkpw] Error in Authorisation

2003-07-26 Thread John Simpson
. peace. -- --- | John Simpson - KG4ZOW - Programmer At Large | | http://www.jms1.net/[EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- pgp0.pgp Description: signature

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail without qmail

2003-07-27 Thread John Simpson
be vpopmail anymore. and fix your Reply-To: header. it contains your name but no email address, making it difficult for people to reply to your messages. -- --- | John Simpson - KG4ZOW - Programmer At Large | | http://www.jms1.net/[EMAIL

Re: [vchkpw] Domain Limits

2003-07-29 Thread John Simpson
http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html then read the file README.quotas in the source. -- --- | John Simpson - KG4ZOW - Programmer At Large | | http://www.jms1.net/[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail virus scanning - but per domain

2003-08-01 Thread John Simpson
question is close to being off-topic for this mailing list. --- | John Simpson - KG4ZOW - Programmer at Large | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.jms1.net/ | ---

Re: [vchkpw] Pulling raw messages out of a maildir

2003-08-21 Thread John Simpson
or not. - --- | John Simpson - KG4ZOW - Programmer at Large | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.jms1.net/ | - --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.0.2 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com iQA

Re: [vchkpw] Some help needed [Off-topic]

2003-08-28 Thread John Simpson
). peace. --- | John Simpson - KG4ZOW - Programmer at Large | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.jms1.net/ | --- PGP.sig Description: PGP signature

Re: [vchkpw] courier pop3d

2003-08-29 Thread John Simpson
i've been running with for the past several months. hope this helps. --- | John Simpson - KG4ZOW - Programmer at Large | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.jms1.net/ | --- PGP.sig Description: PGP signature

Re: [vchkpw] System virtual User Authentication

2003-09-02 Thread John Simpson
. --- | John Simpson - KG4ZOW - Programmer at Large | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.jms1.net/ | --- PGP.sig Description: PGP signature

Re: [vchkpw] What if mysql was preinstalled?

2003-09-04 Thread John Simpson
. --- | John Simpson - KG4ZOW - Programmer at Large | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.jms1.net/ | --- PGP.sig Description: PGP signature

[vchkpw] mysql - valias sequence?

2005-07-19 Thread John Simpson
howdy- while answering a question for somebody on another mailing list i happened to notice that, at least as of vpopmail 5.4.10, the structure of the valias table created in a mysql database does not have any provision for sequencing the entries attached to a given alias. in many cases

Re: [vchkpw] mysql - valias sequence?

2005-07-19 Thread John Simpson
On Jul 19, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Rick Widmer wrote: John Simpson wrote: and if so, does mysql have any guaranteed order that it will present the records with an explicit ORDER BY clause in the query? There is no ORDER BY clause in the query, so the order the records is random. They may

Re: [vchkpw] spam questions general

2005-07-23 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-07-22, at 15:06, Andras Kende wrote: I have a server where I receive about 1 spam emails / day. I had set to Set catchall email deleted which made it down to 1000 spam a day. Before was Set catchall email bounced but the queue was filling up quickly... Can you give some

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail version confusion

2005-08-23 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-08-22, at 1837, Robin Bowes wrote: Tom Collins wrote: On Aug 22, 2005, at 1:47 PM, Robin Bowes wrote: The reason I'm asking is that I currently use vpopmaild but I must have an old version from a previous 5.5.3 install as I'm currently using vpopmail 5.4.12 which doesn't have

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail version confusion

2005-08-23 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-08-23, at 0407, Robin Bowes wrote: John Simpson wrote: if you can write a plug-in which reads a cdb file, i've already written a script which generates a list of every valid email address on a vpopmail system. i wrote it because i also wrote a patch for qmail-smtpd which checks

Re: [vchkpw] Problem with vadddomain -u and mysql authentication.

2005-08-25 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-08-25, at 0900, Tijs Zwinkels wrote: I am currently trying to use vpopmail 2.4.12 with mysql authentication. I want to store the mail in the user-directories, to make mail count for the system-quota's. Therefore i'm using the vadddomain -u flag. you do realize that vpopmail

Re: [vchkpw] Problem with vadddomain -u and mysql authentication.

2005-08-25 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-08-25, at 0907, Rick Macdougall wrote: Tijs Zwinkels wrote: It seems that both qmailadmin and the delivery process 'setuid' to the user that's receiving the mail. The problem is: the vpopmail.mysql file isn't readable by 'normal' users. Nor i want it to be readable by my users: With

Re: [vchkpw] [Offtopic] How you handle old mails

2005-08-28 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-08-28, at 0815, Tanmaya Anand wrote: I would like to know everyone feedback on how you handle old mails say 2 months old. if it's that old and hasn't been read, i would ask the user why they aren't checking their email, and ask them to check it every so often and delete anything

Re: [vchkpw] Rsync concerns

2005-09-12 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-09-12, at 0348, Andrew Hodgson wrote: I am currently using Rsync to mirror /home/vpopmail/domains/ virtualdomain, however, while this works without errors during the night, during the day we get errors in the Cronlog because the users are collecting mail via POP. I am not too

Re: [vchkpw] Help! /var/qmail removed

2005-09-19 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-09-19, at 1406, Matt Brookings wrote: I just wanted to follow this posting up with a script that handles hashed domains directories. It's a little longer the previous one, and may be a little fishy on older bash shells, but it should work on any newer systems. If you use it, let me

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8b

2005-09-22 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-09-21, at 0614, Aleks Olsen wrote: - Now, it seems the patch didnt like working with auth-jms1.4a.patch (auth patch) and/or qmail-1.03-jms1.5.patch (tls patch). both of which are ANCIENT. my combined patch is up to version 6b now. and it doesn't use chkuser... i doctored up a

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8b

2005-09-22 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-09-21, at 0623, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Why are you running it with -u $QMAILDUID ? You should run it as vpopmail, excluding any uidswitching (if you enabled uidswitching within chkuser_settings.h, comment it). Cert must be owned by vpopmail as well. qmail is, and has always

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8b

2005-09-26 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-09-22, at 1234, Tom Collins wrote: On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:42 AM, John Simpson wrote: if you're supporting AUTH, you really should use TLS as well. otherwise you're allowing your users to send their passwords across the internet in plain text- and all it takes is one spammer

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser 2.0.8b

2005-09-26 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-09-22, at 1627, Erwin Hoffmann wrote: At 18:12 22.09.2005 +0100, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: At 17.34 22/09/2005, you wrote: On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:42 AM, John Simpson wrote: if you're supporting AUTH, you really should use TLS as well. otherwise you're allowing your users to send

Re: [vchkpw] chkuser+vpopmail 5.4.10+qmail-smtp-auth.patch

2005-09-27 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-09-26, at 0105, rafael marcos bernardes wrote: Im using freebsd 4.11+vpopmail 5.4.10+qmail 1.03[qmailqueue.patch and auth-jms1.4a.patch]. ... the 4a patch is beyond ancient (the jms1 in the filename is me.) you REALLY need to use something more recent. this web page describes the

Re: [vchkpw] qmail-tap documentation error?

2005-10-07 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-10-04, at 1317, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: From the qmailtap INSTALL file: 4) Done To compile it you will at least need to change the error.h file to include errno.h just after the ifdefs at the top of the file. #include error.h doesn't make sense. shouldn't the include line be

Re: [vchkpw] email wildcards?

2005-10-07 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-10-04, at 1959, Ducky wrote: How does one go about setting up wildcards? I just moved servers and all my wild cards do not seem to be working. On my other server with qmail i would just create a .qmail-$email- default file and point it to the local directory. Example: I set up

Re: [vchkpw] a vpopbull question

2005-10-07 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-10-07, at 1113, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yesterday I want to get a list of all emails accounts on my mail server, so i run vpopbull. I got this message ~vpopmail/bin/vpopbull -n -V ~mbeltran/cuentas.txt skipping promotionalrepaldo/home.123.hn (alias of promotionalhome. 123.hn)

Re: [vchkpw] a vpopbull question

2005-10-10 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-10-07, at 1830, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you may want to look at my mkvalidrcptto script- I'm interested on your script mkvalidrcptto but it has not a help. what is the syntax? there's no real syntax- you just run it. it scans the directories it needs and sends the output to

Re: [vchkpw] vauth_getpw() with Apache/CGI

2005-10-19 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-10-19, at 2029, Charles Collicutt wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 02:32:34PM -0700, Tom Collins wrote: IIRC, it may need to read the files in /var/qmail/control and/or /var/qmail/users as well. Thank you - it makes sense now. It looks like it will be easiest to just leave the setuid

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail upgrade == qmail recompile needed ?

2005-10-27 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-10-26, at 1902, Szeki - Inc wrote: If I upgrade vpopmail from an earlier version (say from the same mainline eg from 5.4.10 to 5.4.13), than I have to recompile qmail - it is using Bill Shupp's 0.8 patch - if it is using chkuser ? considering that the chkuser patch relies on

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail upgrade == qmail recompile needed ?

2005-10-27 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-10-26, at 1949, Rick Macdougall wrote: Domain Quotas are not going to happen anytime soon I think, the over head of calculating the quota for a domain of 20K users is just too much. If you really need domain quotas, use a separate user for each domain and use system quotas. Of

Re: [vchkpw] How expensive is reloading the tcp.smtp.cdb?

2005-10-28 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-10-26, at 1805, ISP Lists wrote: Related to my earlier post, how expensive is it - resource-wise - to reload a tcp.smtp file of 100-1000 lines? if it's anything like mine, with currently 56,270 lines and more added every time some spammer sends a message to an email address in the

Re: [vchkpw] How to run multiple qmail-queue

2005-10-28 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-10-27, at 0404, Manish Jain wrote: I have installed netqmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin on RHEL 3.0 I have configured multile domains on the server. And using smtproutes in /var/qmail/control to route the mails of different domains to the clients mailsrevers in remote. I am facing problem,

Re: [vchkpw] How to run multiple qmail-queue

2005-10-29 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-10-28, at 0800, Ingo Claro wrote: Your could have many instances of qmail running in different ports. and with smtproutes deliver some domains to the qmails... no. you can have many instances of qmail-smtpd running on different IP addresses and/or ports, but it's still just the one

Re: [vchkpw] How expensive is reloading the tcp.smtp.cdb?

2005-10-29 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-10-28, at 0803, Ingo Claro wrote: what do you mean by delete.net domain ? you have a bogus virtualdomain to catch spammers? i own the domain delete.net, and i run it as a honeypot. the http://www.delete.net/ web page explains this.

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail upgrade == qmail recompile needed ?

2005-10-29 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-10-28, at 1328, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: On Thursday 27 October 2005 10:57 pm, John Simpson wrote: On 2005-10-26, at 1949, Rick Macdougall wrote: Domain Quotas are not going to happen anytime soon I think, the over head of calculating the quota for a domain of 20K users is just too much

Re: [vchkpw] How to run multiple qmail-queue

2005-10-30 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-10-29, at 1623, Ingo Claro wrote: but if you install many qmails in different directories (/var/qmail, /var/qmail2, ...) you can have multiple queues. i understand that. i also understand (from direct experience) that it's an administrative nightmare, and it's a lot more work than he

Re: [vchkpw] Migrating vmailmgr to vpopmail+mysql

2005-10-30 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-10-30, at 1033, aichains wrote: Resurrecting previous post that I found on MARC: does anybody know a way to convert mails and accounts from vmailmgr to vpopmail? i already searched the archive and google without any result. ... I'm currently in the same situation and am looking for

Re: [vchkpw] New user with folder

2005-10-30 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-10-30, at 1300, Tom Collins wrote: On Oct 30, 2005, at 9:35 AM, Anilkumar wrote: it create the user perfectly with his Inbox i want to create four (4) new folder at the time of creating a new user Edit the function make_user_dir() in vpopmail.c. At the beginning of the function,

Re: [vchkpw] Re: qmail+vpopmail on redhat 7.3 server gets very busy

2005-11-06 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-11-06, at 1933, Sam wrote: Now that my server is up and running, two last questions: 1- I know that a bad address causes the email to bounce, but what is a doublebounce exactly? let's say a message arrives, addressed to a userid on your system which doesn't exist. that message will

Re: [vchkpw] recompile or not

2005-11-07 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-11-06, at 2143, Szeki - Inc wrote: Question is: I have to recompile, if I only change some function in vpopmail ? The version remains the same, only for example, logging change from p to v. I really have to recompile courier-atuthlib if I change vpopmail option enable-sql-logging ?

Re: [vchkpw] recompile or not

2005-11-07 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-11-07, at 1015, Nicholas Harring wrote: Please, please, please don't spread FUD by even implicitly blaming chkuser for this. i wasn't trying to cast blame anywhere, and if it sounded like i was then i apologize. There's no way to implement chkuser in even a vaguely efficient

Re: [vchkpw] recompile or not

2005-11-09 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-11-07, at 2354, Tom Collins wrote: One problem is that some programs (including qmailadmin) actually make use of information in the header files to conditionally compile its code. To truly move to a dynamic lib, we need to have any program that links to libvpopmail do so without

Re: [vchkpw] User defined .qmail files

2005-11-22 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-11-22, at 2015, James Longstreet wrote: Is there any way, with vpopmail, to have specify a .qmail file to be processed as a user? For instance: - Mail comes in for [EMAIL PROTECTED] - qmail-local delivers mail as vpopmail/vpopmail using ~vpopmail/domains/example.com/joe/.qmail -

Re: [vchkpw] User defined .qmail files

2005-11-23 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-11-23, at 1154, Tom Collins wrote: On Nov 22, 2005, at 8:50 PM, John Simpson wrote: vpopmail isn't the cause of this problem- you're simply running into the limit of what qmailadmin allows the user to do. it probably wouldn't take much for them to add the ability to enter arbitrary

[vchkpw] vpopmaild

2005-11-27 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-11-07, at 1043, Ken Jones wrote: Cristiano Deana wrote: Hi, is 'vpopmaild' project still open? I have seen from cvs vpopmaild.c file hasn't been modified since dec 2004, why? And php = vpopmaild? Yep. It's still active. Last week I started a vpopmaild documentation page.

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmaild

2005-11-28 Thread John Simpson
On 2005-11-28, at 0715, Robin Bowes wrote: John Simpson said the following on 27/11/2005 23:40: and a suggestion: how about adding a exists [EMAIL PROTECTED] command, which would check whether the address is deliverable (meaning it exists as a mailbox, an alias, a .qmail- mailbox file

Re: [vchkpw] VPOPMAIL Backup

2006-01-16 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-01-04, at 1229, Rick Macdougall wrote: Michl wrote: Hi all, i need to setup a configuration backup for all my vpopmail domains, vpopmail settings, and qmail settings. What are the files I need to store in my backup to get a quickly disaster recovery? For qmail

[vchkpw] vpopmaild status?

2006-01-16 Thread John Simpson
i'm wondering about vpopmaild... i plan on writing a patch for qmail- smtpd which will make it connect to vpopmaild in order to handle the AUTH command (basically try to login and use the + or - response to approve or deny the AUTH command.) my questions are: - how close are we to seeing

[vchkpw] vpopmail suggestion - external hook?

2006-01-16 Thread John Simpson
how hard would it be for libvpopmail to implement a hook, where an external command (defined in a ~vpopmail/etc file) is executed whenever something changes- domains added or deleted, mailboxes or aliases added or deleted, passwords changed, etc... some of you may be familiar with my

[vchkpw] qmailtap question

2006-02-04 Thread John Simpson
just a quick question. i'm maintaining the monster combined patch that qmailrocks has adopted, and over the past few months i've been hammered with questions about using QUEUE_EXTRA. apparently it works with older versions of my combined patch, but since i added the ext_todo patch (which solves

Re: [vchkpw] Create forward

2006-02-05 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-02-03, at 1335, Oliver Etzel - GoodnGo.COM ((R)) wrote: that is easy done with the configuration of the .qmail - file with is in the directory under: /home/vopopmail/domains/domail.com/user1/.qmail - Open this file, e.g. with vi like this: # vi

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap question

2006-02-06 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-02-06, at 1620, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: i'm thinking about possibly including the qmailtap patch in my combined patch file. however, the biggest problem i've seen from people using QUEUE_EXTRA is that they set up loops when they try to send the copies to a remote address, and because

Re: [vchkpw] cram-md5 smtp auth failure.

2006-02-07 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-02-07, at 0623, N0K wrote: Hello, and thanks for the reply, i have quit smtp auth old patch and i have patched with vpopmail/contrib patch, but now, i get the next error: tsuki:/var/qmail/supervise# telnet localhost 25 ... AUTH LOGIN 334 VXNlcm5hbWU6

Re: [vchkpw] qmailtap question

2006-02-07 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-02-07, at 0214, Adam Ossenford wrote: I was able to integrate your qmail-1.03-jms1.6c patch and the qmail tap patch successfully. did you do mine first and then qmailtap, or the other way around? did the patch apply cleanly or were there any rejects which had to be handled

Re: [vchkpw] cram-md5 smtp auth failure.

2006-02-07 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-02-07, at 0703, N0K wrote: For the moment only want see smtp auth run. But the result is the same: tsuki:/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd# telnet localhost 25 ... auth login 334 VXNlcm5hbWU6 Cgp0b2xerylQHRlcF3QuY29t 334 UGFzc3dvcmQ6 CgasoxMaajMw 454 oops, unable to write pipe and

Re: [vchkpw] cram-md5 smtp auth failure.

2006-02-07 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-02-07, at 0759, Rick Macdougall wrote: Just an FYI to the original poster, the new patch does not require the host name in the run file of qmail-smtpd. If it is there, it will make you an open relay. It's not part of the problem above I believe but I thought you should be made

[vchkpw] 5.4.15 onchange patch

2006-03-26 Thread John Simpson
howdy- i have written a few patches for qmail, one of which implements a RCPT TO check to verify whether or not the recipient address exists or not (like the chkuser patch, but which reads a cdb file and can therefore run on a machine which is not the same machine where vpopmail is

Re: [vchkpw] Re: 5.4.15 onchange patch

2006-03-30 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-03-27, at 1304, Robin Bowes wrote: John Simpson wrote: i have written a patch against vpopmail-5.4.15 which causes any changes to trigger ~vpopmail/etc/onchange, if it exists and if it is executable to the userid which is running the vpopmail program. the patch can be downloaded

Re: [vchkpw] /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-user

2006-03-30 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-03-28, at 0606, Jimmy Stewpot wrote: I have a server that is setup as having vpopmail installed to run all of the emails without having system accounts. I have got users on the system that have cronjobs running. If those users have a crontab that runs and has an error it will

Re: [vchkpw] Re: 5.4.15 onchange patch

2006-03-30 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-03-30, at 1019, Robin Bowes wrote: John Simpson wrote: http://qmail.jms1.net/vpopmaild.shtml shows a clearer example of how to run vpopmaild under daemontools, by the way. Clearer than what? clearer that the first few lines of README.vpopmaild from the source code, which

Re: [vchkpw] Global addressbook support

2006-03-30 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-03-30, at 1522, Matt Brookings wrote: We're currently working on a project to integrate automatic updates to a global addressbook via vpopmail's API. During a meeting, we discussed using the hook features, rather than directly modifying the vpopmail API to call OpenLDAP functions.

Re: [vchkpw] Re: 5.4.15 onchange patch

2006-03-31 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-03-30, at 2124, Rick Widmer wrote: John Simpson wrote: http://qmail.jms1.net/vpopmaild.shtml shows a clearer example of how to run vpopmaild under daemontools, by the way. Nice page! Just a thought... if you are only using vpopmaild to verify user logins, you might want to use

Re: [vchkpw] Re: 5.4.15 onchange patch

2006-04-02 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-01, at 0547, Rick Widmer wrote: John Simpson wrote: let me suggest an alternative- instead of login user pass compact, how about login/compact user pass? this allows the password to be the last thing on the line, and therefore contain spaces, and still allows for a compact

Re: [vchkpw] Re: 5.4.15 onchange patch

2006-04-03 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-02, at 0809, Rick Widmer wrote: Robin Bowes wrote: So, a system only needing to validate credentials would just need to login and quit. Which is what slogin will do. You may not even have to quit. It could just return OK or ERROR, and exit. I'm not sure what John did, but he

Re: [vchkpw] Re: 5.4.15 onchange patch

2006-04-03 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-02, at 0829, Rick Widmer wrote: John Simpson wrote: On 2006-04-01, at 0547, Rick Widmer wrote: I was planning if you would like a way to see if a user exists without returning anything else... that's certainly a possibility, easy enough to add... should that be available

Re: [vchkpw] Re: 5.4.15 onchange patch

2006-04-03 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-03, at 0727, Rick Widmer wrote: John Simpson wrote: and since i now have two different patches for vpopmail, it's time to create a new web page to hold them. both patches are available from this page, which includes basic documentation for the new features. http

Re: [vchkpw] Re: 5.4.15 onchange patch

2006-04-03 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-03, at 0824, Robin Bowes wrote: Rick Widmer wrote: I was under the impression your interest is based on Robin Bowes suggestion about the validrcptto.cdb patch, so it is does this mailbox exist. We may as well make it easy, it should be a popular function. Yes - having this

Re: [vchkpw] Re: 5.4.15 onchange patch

2006-04-03 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-03, at 1159, Tom Collins wrote: On Apr 3, 2006, at 5:24 AM, Robin Bowes wrote: Rick Widmer wrote: I was under the impression your interest is based on Robin Bowes suggestion about the validrcptto.cdb patch, so it is does this mailbox exist. We may as well make it easy, it

Re: [vchkpw] Re: 5.4.15 onchange patch

2006-04-03 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-03, at 1609, Robin Bowes wrote: This is how I've implemented a plugin for qpsmtpd that auths against vpopmaild. It's extremely easy: # create socket my $vpopmaild_socket = IO::Socket::INET-new(PeerAddr = vpopmaild_host, PeerPort =

Re: [vchkpw] rblsmtpd with vchkpw

2006-04-03 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-03, at 1024, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, there is any rule to put in ~vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp for one user has been authenticated not be IP checked on rblsmtpd ? if by authenticated you mean that their IP address matches a certain line, yes. the example you include...

Re: [vchkpw] rblsmtpd with vchkpw

2006-04-04 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-05, at 0002, Fernando Milovich wrote: I mean bypass RBL is the client is authenticated. But it seems to be no possibly. This problem is because our customers use ISP connections like ADSL and Dial Up and these connections are blocked by CBL at spamhaus.org I think i´ll have to

Re: [vchkpw] Re: 5.4.15 onchange patch

2006-04-04 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-03, at 1442, John Simpson wrote: On 2006-04-03, at 0727, Rick Widmer wrote: In the patch, how do you separate password and real_name in add_user? I know the help doesn't mention it, but I think it requires a real name value to put into GECOS. It is at least an option. good

[vchkpw] bug found in vdominfo

2006-04-07 Thread John Simpson
while trying to answer a question on the qmailrocks list about a problem with vchkpw, i noticed a problem with the vdominfo -n command... when listing domains, it doesn't list alias domains correctly. instead of aliasdomain (alias of realdomain) it's showing realdomain (alias of

Re: [vchkpw] How to bypass quota

2006-04-15 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-14, at 0426, Olivier JUDITH wrote: I use qmail + vpopmail + courrier-imap ... and i have activated quota for each users to 100M . It work fine fine but, some users would like to be prevent when their Maildir box size is greater than quota and continue to receive their mail. Can i

Re: [vchkpw] Force Auth from all but localhost

2006-04-15 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-14, at 0338, Sascha Ebach wrote: how can I enforce that everybody (except localhost) has to authenticate via smtp auth. my combined patch, version 6 or newer, includes this functionality. http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/combined.shtml you can export a REQUIRE_AUTH=1

Re: [vchkpw] Force Auth from all but localhost

2006-04-15 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-15, at 1003, Remo Mattei wrote: John Simpson wrote: On 2006-04-14, at 0338, Sascha Ebach wrote: how can I enforce that everybody (except localhost) has to authenticate via smtp auth. my combined patch, version 6 or newer, includes this functionality. http://qmail.jms1.net

Re: [vchkpw] ONCHANGE behavior

2006-04-15 Thread John Simpson
mailbox. i'm all about maintaining as much flexibility as possible. my recommendation is to leave it the way it is. Finally, is there anything I should add to the readme file? ... This is based on the onchange.2 patch by John Simpson. Rick Widmer changed ./configure.in so the onchange code

Re: [vchkpw] Re: ONCHANGE behavior

2006-04-15 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-15, at 1917, Rick Widmer wrote: Robin Bowes wrote: I must admit I've not actually looked at John's code. However, my thoughts (based on your comments) are as follows: add_user should be called as well as add_domain when a new domain is created - these are separate actions that happen

Re: [vchkpw] ONCHANGE behavior

2006-04-15 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-15, at 2152, Rick Widmer wrote: Rick Widmer wrote: John Simpson wrote: (1) please include the URL http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/ vpopmail.shtml in the file, so that poeple can easily find the documentation i have written (and will be maintaining) for it. i'll be watching

Re: [vchkpw] Re: ONCHANGE behavior

2006-04-16 Thread John Simpson
(re-arranging things so the sequence of my answers makes sense...) On 2006-04-15, at 2237, Rick Widmer wrote: John Simpson wrote: if the onchange script needs to know whether the user's request affected a real or alias domain, simply look to see if there IS another domain listed afterward

Re: [vchkpw] ONCHANGE in CVS

2006-04-16 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-16, at 0334, Rick Widmer wrote: John Simpson wrote: On 2006-04-16, at 0050, Rick Widmer wrote: I've just committed John Simpson's onchange patch. I've added the ability to enable it with --enable-onchange-script, and a file README.onchange. cool... except that i've

Re: [vchkpw] ONCHANGE in CVS

2006-04-16 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-16, at 0822, Rick Widmer wrote: John Simpson wrote: i just had a thought- is there a vchkpw-devel mailing list that this conversation should be moved to? i suspect that most people on the list aren't interested in these kinds of low-level details- or maybe i'm wrong

Re: [vchkpw] Re: ONCHANGE behavior

2006-04-16 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-16, at 0639, Robin Bowes wrote: If you look at qpsmtpd (which is where I believe the idea of onchange hooks came from) not really... it's something i've wished that vpopmail had for several years, but never had the time to write. It also calls different scripts for each hook

Re: [vchkpw] Re: ONCHANGE behavior

2006-04-16 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-16, at 1649, Robin Bowes wrote: John Simpson wrote: On 2006-04-16, at 0639, Robin Bowes wrote: It also calls different scripts for each hook rather than having one monolithic something's changed script. Would that be a better approach for vpopmail? i don't think so. if you

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail Authentication Problem

2006-04-19 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-19, at 1231, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am having trouble with user authentication. I am running Fedora Core 5 on a Dell PowerEdge blade server with the latest (as of a few days ago) versions of qmail, vpopmail, and qmailadmin. specific version numbers? any patches applied on top of

Re: [vchkpw] How to bypass quota

2006-04-25 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-04-25, at 1245, Olivier JUDITH wrote: I completly agree with you , but imagine that you going on holidays and you receive lot of email during this period . you reach your quota and don't receive mail anymore ? I think it's better to block user for sending but continue to receive

Re: [vchkpw] NFS and vpopmail

2006-05-12 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-05-11, at 1800, Jeremy Kister wrote: On 5/11/2006 5:55 PM, MT wrote: sends hup signal to qmail-send to accept new domain So I have /home/vpopmail/domains, /var/qmail/control/, /var/qmail/ users on my NFS. [...] I have to delete / add the domain on 10.0.0.2 to get it to work

Re: [vchkpw] NFS and vpopmail

2006-05-12 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-05-12, at 1347, Tom Collins wrote: On May 12, 2006, at 10:22 AM, MT wrote: The qmail-smtpd process doesn't have the correct permissions to read the vpasswd file for the domain (or the vpopmail.mysql file with the MySQL login info). So I'm still reinstalling - nice POS hardware I'm

Re: [vchkpw] NFS and vpopmail

2006-05-12 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-05-12, at 1512, Jeremy Kister wrote: On 5/12/2006 3:01 PM, John Simpson wrote: you don't need to HUP qmail-send when users/assign changes, you need to run qmail-newu. qmail-lspawn reads users/cdb, users/ assign is just a text file which is used to build users/cdb. I simply infer

Re: [vchkpw] dot-qmail ordering

2006-05-15 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-05-13, at 1344, Michael Krieger wrote: I've been browsing the qmailadmin/vpopmail code and see that there's no effort to enforce order in dot-qmail files. Adding lines to a dot-qmail file is just an append to the end of the file it seems with valias_insert and so on [at least in

Re: [vchkpw] Qmailrocks version qmail 1.03 with chkuser 2.0

2006-07-28 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-07-19, at 1836, Adriano Frare wrote: How I install path chkuser 2.0 with qmailrocks ? qmailrocks is built around a combined patch file that i wrote. however, it's using a really ancient version of that patch- eric (the qmailrocks maintainer) basically abandoned it for almost a

Re: [vchkpw] Real users inside a virtual domain

2006-07-28 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-07-27, at 0817, Charles Butcher wrote: A few power users within a virtual email domain have shell login access to the server. I want their mail to be delivered to their home directory, not to a vpopmail account. I also want the .qmail-ext mechanisms to work for them, under their

Re: [vchkpw] Real users inside a virtual domain

2006-07-28 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-07-28, at 1721, Matt Kane wrote: ... why are you replying via private email? this conversation started on the vchkpw list, it should stay there. there's nothing in your message which would justify it leaving the list. I havn't tried this but would it not be possible to simply

Re: [vchkpw] vdelivermail patch in order to handle maildrop filtering capabilities

2006-10-25 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-10-25, at 1152, Jérôme MOLLIER-PIERRET wrote: It also has the granularity of a using a mailfilter configuration file for domains (ie /home/vpopmail/domains/onedomain/mailfilter), all domains (ie /home/vpopmail/domains/mailfilter) … and indeed a default one in /etc/mailfilter.

Re: [vchkpw] Re: [toaster] filtering outgoing emails

2006-10-25 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-10-25, at 1614, Ingo Claro wrote: Jeff Koch escribió: We are getting demands from large ISP's - Comcast, AOL, ATT - that we spam filter all outgoing email. We're using simscan to filter incoming email but I think that misses email generated by our customers and autoresponders.

Re: [vchkpw] Re: [toaster] filtering outgoing emails

2006-10-26 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-10-25, at 1756, Howard Jones wrote: I've just started using qpsmtpd to do SMTP AUTH against my vpopmail users with vchkpw, to avoid running a patched qmail-smtpd[1]... [1] actually, it's to avoid having to reconcile SMTP AUTH patches with chkuser, which I already use, and couldn't live

Re: [vchkpw] vdelivermail patch in order to handle maildrop filtering capabilities

2006-10-26 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-10-26, at 0359, Jérôme MOLLIER-PIERRET wrote: John Simpson a écrit : also, what if a user (i.e. the owner of one specific mailbox) wants to create their own .mailfilter file, either directly or using some kind of web interface which gives them a set of options and writes

Re: [vchkpw] OT: tcpserver and rblsmtpd clones

2006-10-26 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-10-26, at 0441, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: Does anyone know about good clones/substitutes of tcpserver and rblsmtpd? I'ld like they to have a more open licensing, so developing and deployment of new integrated features could be more easy. (sorry for going even further off topic)

  1   2   >