[vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.27

2003-09-17 Thread X-Istence
this tutorial: http://tutorials.x-istence.com/qMail_vpopmail_daemontools_authpatch.xhtml The fact that for some reason vdelivermail cant open something would be wrong, considering it always says it no matter what the permissions for the DIR/Files are, and whatever user its run under. This a coding error? X

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail 5.3.27

2003-09-18 Thread X-Istence
Charles Sprickman wrote: On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Paul L. Allen wrote: Bottom line: if somebody is obviously doing his or her best to get an answer, I will respond if I can. If somebody is trying to get me to do hi9 or her homework for them I will flame. I think the person who

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail 5.3.27

2003-09-18 Thread X-Istence
Marcin Soltysiak wrote: And the winner is: drwxr-x--- 2 root wheel 512 Sep 17 22:37 bin vopopmail has no permission to enter bin directory SOlt allhope# ls -al total 16 drwxr-xr-x 8 root wheel 512 Sep 17 22:37 . drwxr-xr-x 16 root wheel 512 Sep 17 22:37

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail 5.3.27

2003-09-18 Thread X-Istence
X-Istence wrote: Marcin Soltysiak wrote: And the winner is: drwxr-x--- 2 root wheel 512 Sep 17 22:37 bin vopopmail has no permission to enter bin directory SOlt allhope# ls -al total 16 drwxr-xr-x 8 root wheel 512 Sep 17 22:37

[vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.27 - repost

2003-09-19 Thread X-Istence
Hey all, I know this is a repost, but this time ill add all the info i can collect. Since the switch to vpopmail 5.3.27 we have been getting these in our logs: @40003f68dc7d0e0da60c info msg 217: bytes 845 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] qp 67340 uid 0 @40003f68dc7d0e83ef4c starting

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.27 - repost

2003-09-19 Thread X-Istence
Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: At 01:29 AM 9/19/2003, X-Istence wrote: So then we started getting these messages in our logs: @40003f69830f2c2df1b4 info msg 47: bytes 1153 from * qp 70866 uid 0 @40003f69830f2ca1d1c4 starting delivery 60: msg 47 to local

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.27 - repost

2003-09-19 Thread X-Istence
Michael Bowe wrote: At 01:29 AM 9/19/2003, X-Istence wrote: So then we started getting these messages in our logs: @40003f69830f2c2df1b4 info msg 47: bytes 1153 from * qp 70866 uid 0 @40003f69830f2ca1d1c4 starting delivery 60: msg 47 to local

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Permissions problem on /home/vpopmail after re-compile

2003-09-21 Thread X-Istence
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 4:24 PM Subject: Permissions problem on /home/vpopmail after re-compile hi all, I have been having a qmailadmin problem for a while now, after playing

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Permissions problem on /home/vpopmail after re-compile

2003-09-21 Thread X-Istence
Not according to what i see, i said ls -al for /home/vpopmail not /home/vpopmail/domains

Re: [vchkpw] synchronize control files

2003-09-21 Thread X-Istence
Tim Hasson wrote: Hi, snip Respectfully, Tim Hasson As i have tinkered with the source code myself, i dont see why qmail would have to be restarted. In the qmail source file, it re-reads the rcpthosts file on every run of it ( qmail-smtpd ), so hot adding shouldnt be a problem at all. X

Re: [vchkpw] synchronize control files

2003-09-21 Thread X-Istence
Tim Hasson wrote: Quoting X-Istence [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As i have tinkered with the source code myself, i dont see why qmail would have to be restarted. In the qmail source file, it re-reads the rcpthosts file on every run of it ( qmail-smtpd ), so hot adding shouldnt be a problem at all

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Permissions problem on /home/vpopmail after re-compile

2003-09-22 Thread X-Istence
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Hi again, Any further update / info / suggestions / requests on this topic ? The only advice I have had so far is a request for the output of ls -la /home/vpopmail/domains which is in this post. I am now getting very lost. Thanks, Matt. I dont know

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail 5.3.27 -- problem with bin and lib permissions

2003-09-22 Thread X-Istence
Tom Collins wrote: On Thursday, September 18, 2003, at 03:11 AM, X-Istence wrote: And the winner is: drwxr-x--- 2 root wheel 512 Sep 17 22:37 bin We've been working on the Makefile.am to avoid trashing permissions on bin and lib when installing to /usr

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail 5.3.27 -- problem with bin and lib permissions

2003-09-22 Thread X-Istence
Tom Collins wrote: On Monday, September 22, 2003, at 12:21 PM, X-Istence wrote: +chmod 700 $(DESTDIR)@vpopmaildir@/@domains_dir@ +chown -R @vpouser@ $(DESTDIR)@vpopmaildir@ +chgrp -R @vpopgroup@ $(DESTDIR)@vpopmaildir@ +chown -R root $(DESTDIR)@vpopmaildir@/lib +chgrp -R

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Permissions problem on /home/vpopmail after re-compile

2003-09-23 Thread X-Istence
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: X-Istence Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 8:00 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Permissions problem on /home/vpopmail after re-compile [EMAIL

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Feature request for vaddaliasdomain

2003-09-24 Thread X-Istence
Stop bickering please, common. Difference between the origional and that what i changed around Breached# diff vaddaliasdomain.c.backup vaddaliasdomain.c 56c56,57 printf(vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options] alias_domain real_domain\n); --- /* printf(vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options]

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Feature request for vaddaliasdomain

2003-09-24 Thread X-Istence
Stop bickering please, common. Difference between the origional and that what i changed around Breached# diff vaddaliasdomain.c.backup vaddaliasdomain.c 56c56,57 printf(vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options] alias_domain real_domain\n); --- /* printf(vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options]

Re: [vchkpw] apop on vpopmail-5.2.1

2003-09-25 Thread X-Istence
Luca Morettoni wrote: Hi! I'm using the stable version of vpopmail (current 5.2.1) and I try to enable the APOP feature, in http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail/vpopmail.html is wrote to use -enable-apop in configure script, but I see that this option is not used... is true? I see that there is no way

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.27 + mysql

2003-09-26 Thread X-Istence
Russell Mann wrote: snip P.S. - List Owner - your list software is set to reply to the original sender rather than the list address - in case you weren't aware of it. I think they did this on purpose, so that there is less mail for the list to handle, but then again its annoying because you

Re: [vchkpw] disable quota support entirely

2003-09-27 Thread X-Istence
Jeremy Kister wrote: I need to disable vpopmail's quota support entirely -- can someone make a parameter for compile time ? the maildir++ support is not working correctly in my environment, so I do not want vpopmail to ever send a quota warning message to the user, nor ever bounce email, nor keep

Re: [vchkpw] disable quota support entirely

2003-09-27 Thread X-Istence
Notes: untested as i dont have a box to test this on. It does compile properly, i suggest first testing it, and then using it on a production server. This should basically do what you asked for :) diff: Breached# diff vdelivermail.c /usr/home/main/public_html/random/vdelivermail.c 475a476 /*

Re: [vchkpw] BCC related

2003-09-28 Thread X-Istence
Catalin :: Braescu wrote: I have qmail + vpopmail 5.2. I want to be able to see the BCC field of messages arriving to one mail account. I need to know if the BCC dat is erased in SMTP stage or only in POP3/IMAP stage. Suppose John Doe send me an e-mail message with some other adresses in BCC

Re: [vchkpw] question about exit code of vdelivermail

2003-09-29 Thread X-Istence
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I´ve found the solution myself ... in the ChangeLog it sais that with version 5.2.1 EXITCODE checking for vdelivermail has been put in and I´m currently using 5.2 :( So forget about my question, please give me an answer for this one: Is it save to upgrade from 5.2 to

Re: [vchkpw] How to Stop Spam

2003-09-30 Thread X-Istence
Jesus Ruiz wrote: I'm using spamcontrol 2.0.9, but i receive a lot of spam mail from the ip address block that i allow to relay through my MTA. The problem is that the client receive they ip address dinamically when they connect with dialup or ADSL. Is there away to block and IP address

Re: [vchkpw] How to Stop Spam

2003-09-30 Thread X-Istence
Jacob S. wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 17:44:21 -0400 X-Istence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jesus Ruiz wrote: I'm using spamcontrol 2.0.9, but i receive a lot of spam mail from the ip address block that i allow to relay through my MTA. The problem is that the client

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail 5.3.28 released

2003-10-03 Thread X-Istence
Tom Collins wrote: On Friday, October 3, 2003, at 03:36 PM, Jonathan Viney wrote: One thing I just noticed is that configure appears to run again when running make. ie: ./configure make causes configure to be run twice is this intentional? There's always more to learn with the

Re: [vchkpw] My first problem.

2003-10-07 Thread X-Istence
Alejandro Ortega Paez wrote: Hi, For a long time my vpopmail is working right. I have installed new 5.3.28 and I'm having problems now. I do not know whether this is a vpopmail issue or maildrop, but I 've wanted to write here. The first error message has been with maildrop:

Re: [vchkpw] My first problem.

2003-10-07 Thread X-Istence
Alejandro Ortega Paez wrote: El mar, 07-10-2003 a las 21:14, X-Istence escribi: Alejandro Ortega Paez wrote: Hi, For a long time my vpopmail is working right. I have installed new 5.3.28 and I'm having problems now. I do not know whether this is a vpopmail issue or maildrop

Re: [vchkpw] Re: smtp;553 sorry, sorry, that domain isn't allowed relay (#5.7.1)

2003-10-09 Thread X-Istence
Actually, the error that he gave is in qMail itself, and means that the domain they are trying to send to is not in their /var/qmail/control(s)/rcpthosts, and if they have the auth patch applied, it means they are not allowed to relay. Simple as that :) X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] Multi domain bounce message handling

2003-10-17 Thread X-Istence
Sigmund Gudvangen wrote: Hi, I am in the process of testing out a small qmail/vpopmail server, with two domains; domA.com and domB.com. I have set up one of the domains domA.com as the defult, i.e. /etc/qmail/defaultdomain contains domA.com. Booth domains work as intended for normal mail

Re: [vchkpw] Multi domain bounce message handling

2003-10-17 Thread X-Istence
David Bristol wrote: This may not be the way to go about this, but have you verified that both domains are in the qmail/control/locals file? On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 02:16, X-Istence wrote: Sigmund Gudvangen wrote: Hi, I am in the process of testing out a small

Re: [vchkpw] Multi domain bounce message handling

2003-10-17 Thread X-Istence
Tom Collins wrote: On Friday, October 17, 2003, at 05:27 PM, David Bristol wrote: This may not be the way to go about this, but have you verified that both domains are in the qmail/control/locals file? Don't put vpopmail domains in control/locals. You'll mess things up. There isn't a known

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread X-Istence
Jeremy Kister wrote: I received the below bounce from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list tonight, at about 10PM EST. please note i have obfuscated all email addresses slightly. also note that I have been receiving mail fine from vchkpw, and havnt modified my configuration recently. the bounce my

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread X-Istence
Jeremy Kister wrote: On Saturday, October 18, 2003 11:18 PM, X-Istence wrote: So basically, its on their side, unless something is looping on my side, of which i know nothing. It cannot be on their side; how would their MTA know my maildir is in /home/vpopmail/domains

Re: Fw: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-18 Thread X-Istence
Jeremy Kister wrote: Upon examining the original message that my MTA bounced, I know this is not a coincidence. I trimmed the original message because I thought it was non-relevant, but it clearly is. something in the original message confused some part of my MTA; This _is_ a bug; im just not

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw@inter7.com ezmlm warning

2003-10-19 Thread X-Istence
Adam Hooper wrote: Forging the Delivered-To line could be to Mr. Spammer's advantage, because he could send millions+ of messages to addresses that use vpopmail, and could depend on the bouncing to deliver his mail; just spoof the envelope recipient/from and wala. Not only that, but it

[vchkpw] Re: qMail + vPopMail working together better

2003-10-20 Thread X-Istence
, something like checkpassword but then rahter checkuser? X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] adding domains error

2003-10-21 Thread X-Istence
Tom Collins wrote: On Tuesday, October 21, 2003, at 09:11 AM, Trey Nolen wrote: After upgrading to 5.3.29, we are getting the following error when trying to add a domain: Error: (vadduser) can't read domain limits If you have a ~vpopmail/etc/vlimits.default file, it should work. I'll look

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and many domains

2003-10-22 Thread X-Istence
Martin Spuetz wrote: On Wednesday 22 October 2003 17:29, Tom Collins wrote: What version of vpopmail? I fixed a bug with bad Delivered-To headers in 5.3.25. If there's still problems, please post more information. Hello Tom, I used 5.2.1. An upgraded to 5.2.2 fixed the problem with the

Re: [vchkpw] vadddomain failure

2003-10-22 Thread X-Istence
Thomas Ledet wrote: Hi, I'm having trouble with the vadddomain command. It gives me this error, when i try to add a domain # vadddomain testdomain.com 123test Failure while attempting to remove_line() the locals file Error. Failed to add domain to assign file Error: Could not update file I'm

Re: [vchkpw] Solution to can't read domain limits and failed to vget_limits errors with 5.3.29

2003-10-23 Thread X-Istence
Oden Eriksson wrote: torsdagen den 23 oktober 2003 19.35 skrev Tom Collins: Create a file called vlimits.default in ~vpopmail/etc/. You can use the attached file if you'd like. Nice!. I hope that file makes into the vpopmail distribution. Thanks Tom. Cheers. File will be added

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail with ldap

2003-10-23 Thread X-Istence
Paulo Fragoso wrote: Hi, I'm trying to use vpopmail-5.3.29 with ldap, I have made some modifications on vldap.h: --- vldap.h.origMon Oct 20 15:59:57 2003 +++ vldap.h Thu Oct 23 11:21:01 2003 @@ -33,13 +33,13 @@ #define VLDAP_SERVER

Re: [vchkpw] Problems with 5.3.29

2003-10-25 Thread X-Istence
Tom Collins wrote: On Friday, October 24, 2003, at 04:45 PM, Martin Kos wrote: already gone? Yes, but my hotel has high-speed Internet, so I can spend a few minutes catching up on email (but not working on code). snip We understand you need your vacation. Now get the hell out of that

Re: [vchkpw] qmail installation script 1.3.6 final release

2003-10-30 Thread X-Istence
Chris Ochap wrote: You're a little bit of a jerk there mister. The guy has something to contribute, let him contribute. -Chris -Original Message- From: Davide Giunchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 4:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mailing Vpopmail Subject:

Re: [vchkpw] passwd

2003-10-31 Thread X-Istence
Cristiano Deana - Staff Tecnico wrote: Il giorno Friday 31 October 2003 04:04, wdmarco mi scriveva: /etc/poppasswd Now I want to use the same passwords file of vpopmail (~/domains/domain.com/vpasswd) to check smtp passwords putting /~vpopmail/bin/vchkpw in the script of tcpserver, but it

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail PECL extension for php

2003-11-01 Thread X-Istence
John wrote: Hello, Please let me know where I should direct these 3 questions if they are inappropriate here: Background: I am using vpopmail-devel 5.3.29 successfully with about 500 users in production. I compiled using this: ./configure --enable-roaming-users=n --enable-logging=p

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail PECL extension for php

2003-11-01 Thread X-Istence
John wrote: Thanks, Yeah, qmailadmin/vqadmin are great tools we use, but I have designed a tool at work that manages apache vhosts, dialup accounts, dhcp leases, etc, all in one application (csr application), and I wanted to make my development time for the email/pop/etc.. admin part of the tool

Re: [vchkpw] telnet authentification ?

2003-11-05 Thread X-Istence
Chris Pugh wrote: Florent. Sorry ! I meant ... last line should have specified vchkpw not checkpassword.. #!/bin/sh exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 \ /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l 0 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup FQDN \ /~homeofvpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d

Re: [vchkpw] skel

2003-11-06 Thread X-Istence
Raboo Treed wrote: Tom, Ken Can't anyone of you guys add this to the vpopmail code? I think it's a great feautre, and I also think that many would agree with me about this.. snip Personally i have to disagree. It works fine the standard way it currently is, and i dont see a need for this.

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail uid/gid 89

2003-11-07 Thread X-Istence
Don Walters wrote: On a lot of systems these days you can run vipw to edit the password file and change the UID. vipw will update the shadow password file too (if you use shadow passwords). I have vipw (I'm running RH9) but it seems to be just a incantation of the vi editor that takes me

Re: [vchkpw] customizing mysql table

2003-11-12 Thread X-Istence
jean wainer wrote: Hi, I have a existing qmail installation (with custom webmail in php) which was already bought with some generic japanese mysql-auth patch in a undocumented setup. I'm currently rebuilding the server, and looking to use vpopmail instead of the old setup. I want to migrate the

Re: [vchkpw] Error: Domain does not exist

2003-11-13 Thread X-Istence
Carlos H Pilz wrote: Hi, I installed 5.2.2 vpopmail version with --enable-default-domain=mydomain.com.br ... Can I use vadduser without domain ??? (./vadduser -n iconn) When I use ./vadduser user without domain, I get Error: Domain does not exist message. And I used --enable-passwd=y to use

Re: [vchkpw] Fwd: PCL-0002: Session Hijacking in Sqwebmail

2003-11-17 Thread X-Istence
of the sessions. Well, either that, or use cookies, and drop it totally. Or use the session ID as used now, but check the IP for a returning visitor that does not have a cookie set. Thus now they cannot do this anymore. X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] unable to get mails from outlook...

2003-11-20 Thread X-Istence
Florent Gilain wrote: Hi all, I'm unable to get my emails from outlook or other pop3 mail clients... here is my configuration : Sun solaris 2.9 box in my private network (no public IP address) : IP = 192.168.1.13 / 255.255.255.0 snip Any help would be very very

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail 5.3.30 released

2003-11-20 Thread X-Istence
Tom Collins wrote: On Thursday, November 20, 2003, at 06:05 PM, Gary wrote: Is this release to be considered useable in a production environment where 5.3.29 was not? For some users, 5.3.29 had serious problems that prevented it from working. 5.3.30 should have fixed those problems. I'm

Re: [vchkpw] Mysql Threads

2003-11-24 Thread X-Istence
Adam Hooper wrote: I've never had problems with InnoDB in the past 1-2 years. In one case it's being used for some fairly computationally intense PHP website calculations. Many people have used it in more critical applications, and it's up to the task. Slashdot, for instance, or Yahoo!

Re: [vchkpw] Happy Thanksgiving...

2003-11-27 Thread X-Istence
Gary wrote: To all our American List Members. Cheers to All, Gary You as well off course, and the rest of those that celebrate it. X

Re: [vchkpw] Spam controll ?!

2003-11-30 Thread X-Istence
knom wrote: Hi! I'm getting abount 70 spam-mails just in my own Mailbox! Does anyone know an effective method of filtering out Spammails with a mailsystem qmail/vpopmail ?? I tried Spamassassin, but it doesn't sort out any spam-mails... Please help me !! Thanks, Maximilian. Well you could try

Re: [vchkpw] welcome.msg patch submitted to vpopmail.sf.net patch manager.

2003-11-30 Thread X-Istence
Yermo M. Lamers wrote: I've cleaned up my welcome.msg patch to vpopmail-5.3.30 and posted it on vpopmail.sf.net. It adds a vsendwelcome() function to vpopmail.c and a call to it at the end of vadduser(). Also included are README.welcomemsg and a welcome.msg.dist file which is just a

Re: [vchkpw] vget_assign returns only real domain

2003-12-02 Thread X-Istence
Michael Bowe wrote: Jonas Pasche said: Is there any possibility to remove that functionality and let vget_assign return the same domain name it got from the user's input? Will other things break without this functionality? From what I remember, it does need to be this

Re: [vchkpw] SMTP AUTH USING QMAIL + VCHKPW

2003-12-02 Thread X-Istence
Hélio Rubens Kamogawa wrote: Hi all! I am implementing smtp authentication. I've alredy applied the patch on qmail, and configured my supervise with the following: snip As you can see, the qmailduid and nofilesgid are both set to vpopmail uid and gid. That is what allows me to

Re: [vchkpw] vget_assign returns only real domain

2003-12-02 Thread X-Istence
Tom Collins wrote: It would be better to change qmailadmin to keep and use the domain name entered, and pass a copy to vget_assign. The tricky part is ezmlm (and always has been). If you create a mailing list, it will typically only work for the domain you created it in, and none of the

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail+ldap developer?

2003-12-05 Thread X-Istence
do not have the time or skills to track down and find errors in the code. http://vpopmail.sourceforge.net/ to post your patches :) X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] Problem with vchkpw, system accounts, and smtp-auth.

2003-12-05 Thread X-Istence
in a while even the most experienced will miss one thing. Personally i missed this flag as well, but i just as you also figured it out. :) X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] strange stuff in log.

2003-12-05 Thread X-Istence
John Johnson wrote: Can anyone shed some light on this? It's in my qmail log file and the server is having mail problems but that's because we found the DNS server was not working... 2003-12-05 19:25:22.049714500 warning: unable to open todo/38740 2003-12-05 19:25:22.049725500 warning: unable

Re: [vchkpw] strange stuff in log.

2003-12-06 Thread X-Istence
John Johnson wrote: - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "John Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:25 PM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] strange stuff in log. Quoting John Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: well funny thing is I

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail+ldap developer?

2003-12-06 Thread X-Istence
Tom Collins wrote: On Friday, December 5, 2003, at 10:48 PM, X-Istence wrote: It would be nice to see an active developer for this part of vpopmail, would make a lot of things simpler for a company i work for, i do not have the time or skills to track down and find errors in the code. http

Re: [vchkpw] vadddomain doest create postmaster account

2003-12-07 Thread X-Istence
# cd /usr/local/vpopmail/bin Breached# ./vadddomain test.domain.com test Breached# It would seem he is still using vpopmail 5.3.29 as that is the only version where that "hangup" message gets produced. X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] vadddomain -O is broken in 5.4.0-pre1

2003-12-14 Thread X-Istence
Casey Zacek wrote: 'vadddomain -O' is broken in 5.4.0-pre1, and probably others. The problem is that vget_assign() looks in [/var/qmail/]users/cdb for the domain, and it's not there yet for the vadduser(postmaster) call. vsetuserquota(), after vadduser(), also uses vget_assign(), as does

[vchkpw] Vdelivermail/vpopmail spamassassin patch by Alex Dupre

2003-12-15 Thread X-Istence
Heya In the FreeBSD ports there now exists a way to compile vpopmail with a patch that will include spamassassin to be run from vdelivermail so all mail that goes to any domains it manages will be scanned, and it allows for user based bayesion filtering and what not, ever since it was

Re: [vchkpw] skel

2003-12-15 Thread X-Istence
, and dont allow any user other than vpopmail/root to write/edit files in the directory. X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail + ldap: Error 80

2003-12-15 Thread X-Istence
either. As far as i know, noone has ever seen that error before. X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] POP problems... :(

2004-01-04 Thread X-Istence
170.xx.239 Strange, isn't it Thanks for your help Florian Have you tried creating a normal user and trying to get it then, i have never tried retrieving the postmaster email, i have it forwarded to my main account. X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] Error when vpopmail is autocreating a user

2004-01-10 Thread X-Istence
Michael Bowe wrote: Righto, I have successfully duplicated this fault now. Will investigate and should have a patch soon. :-) Michael. - Original Message - From: Shane Chrisp [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1:12 AM Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Error

Re: [vchkpw] Courier IMAP + Outlook Express Feedbacks

2004-01-15 Thread X-Istence
? Thanks to everyone for feedbacks! Ciao Paolo I sweat by Mozilla ThunderBird, cause its less prone to those MS only viruses, and is a very stable email client, easy to install as well, just drop it in a dir and your set. X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

2004-01-15 Thread X-Istence
Jones I had posted that to the list a while ago hoping it could be added (I dont know how to use sourceforge cvs), anyways, im happy its being used. Soon i might send in a patch to use bogofilter with it, as bogofilter is written in C/C++ it should be faster than AS. X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin patch ready ahead of schedule

2004-01-15 Thread X-Istence
maildir. X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail + Apache

2004-01-25 Thread X-Istence
apache, read that, but dont compile PHP and MySQL :). X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail + Apache

2004-01-25 Thread X-Istence
jmorse wrote: -Original Message- From: jmorse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 4:00 PM Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Vpopmail + Apache -Original Message- From: X-Istence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 2:06 PM Cc

Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail + Apache

2004-01-25 Thread X-Istence
why yours didnt get created :). I am happy its all up and running correctly. X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

2004-01-26 Thread X-Istence
to SA, please let me know. Tom Walsh Network Administrator http://www.ala.net/ I would be interested in that. I have been looking at ways to speed up SA's working speed. X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] reg:smtp auth {?]

2004-01-28 Thread X-Istence
Girish wrote: Hi all, I had pached the qmail with new SPAM CONTROL and trying smtp authentication Now i need to try it whether it is working or not .. for that i tried .. telnet localhost 25 ehlo 250-domain.com 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250 SIZE 0 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN MD5-

Re: [vchkpw] problem with courier-imap with vchkpw authtification

2004-01-29 Thread X-Istence
password blank. X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] similar functions in libvpopmail

2004-02-03 Thread X-Istence
Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote: It seems to me the way to handle that is to have the plugin call vpopmail functions directly. I see QmailAdmin as an adapter between the CGI interface to a web server and the vpopmail functions. How would another applicaion use it? Qmailadmin runs as the

Re: [vchkpw] Smtp Auth with VPopmail

2004-02-10 Thread X-Istence
to archiving and review by someone other than the recipient./ Oops, i am allready violating your special, law thingie. Its annoying to see these attached. Whats the point for a mailling list? X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] Re: [qmailadmin] Re: PHP vpopmail extension

2004-02-16 Thread X-Istence
different apache's side by side, just one, running as www:www :) X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] debian vpopmail-bin package

2004-02-17 Thread X-Istence
with MySQL will not work. X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] Re: [qmailadmin] Re: PHP vpopmail extension

2004-02-18 Thread X-Istence
Rick Widmer wrote: X-Istence wrote: Rick Widmer wrote (At least in part): I am adding the following functions to vpopmail: valias_select_names, valias_select_names_next, valias_select_names_end Kinda like C++'s std::vector things, allowing you to walk thru an array of aliased domain names

Re: [vchkpw] Re: [qmailadmin] Re: PHP vpopmail extension

2004-02-21 Thread X-Istence
Rick Widmer wrote: Existence wrote: Rick Widmer wrote: That is what i meant, not everyone is able to have a special server just for mail, and thus running Apache as vpopmail:vchkpw is not an option. If you created some sort of deamon that allows you with public and privatekey's to

Re: [vchkpw] OFFTOPIC! how come ppl don't start new threads when creating mails??

2004-02-22 Thread X-Istence
Raboo Treed wrote: how come ppl don't start new threads when creating mails?? or is my mail client broken? /Raboo Looks like you as well need to not start threads in the middle of an old one. As you just did what you said you didnt like. X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail - stunnel

2004-02-25 Thread X-Istence
Peter Palmreuther wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Jeff Koch wrote: I have started seeing stunnel processes owned by vpopmail in the process log. Can anyone explain what that's about? or should I be concerned? vpopmail 6977 0.0 0.0 3272 848 ?SFeb19 0:00

Re: [vchkpw] vuserinfo quotas delay

2004-03-11 Thread X-Istence
this? A lot of issues were fixed in 5.2.2 or, even in 5.4.3 (Which is the new stable, 5.5.0 is the new development.). You could try those. If anything, just go to the users Maildir, and delete the quota file, and recreate it with vusermod, or whatever that one tool is called (I am at school, sorry). X

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

2004-03-12 Thread X-Istence
vdelivermail to open files each time it runs, which can be a lot of times, as i get a lot of mail, id rather have it hard coded. X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

2004-03-12 Thread X-Istence
Ken Jones wrote: On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote: Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva: Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15 shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default? I think this should be made an option

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

2004-03-12 Thread X-Istence
Jeremy Kitchen wrote: On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 14:35, X-Istence wrote: Ken Jones wrote: On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote: Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva: Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15 shouldn't be better to put

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin features added to cvs version

2004-03-14 Thread X-Istence
it at the moment, and it causes spamassassin to hang for ages (over 300 seconds per message) for some unknown reason before just letting it pass. We have been using the code in production for weeks with no problems. So hopefully it will work for you. Good to know :) Ken Jones X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] spamassassin features added to cvs version

2004-03-15 Thread X-Istence
Ken wrote: On Sunday 14 March 2004 6:42 pm, X-Istence wrote: snip -gx enable automatically deleting email marked as spam Do we get to set the limit? Like i prefer to not delete anything over 4, but delete anyting higher than 8. If we delete anything marked as spam, it would delete at level 4

Re: [vchkpw] call for scripts/tools

2004-03-23 Thread X-Istence
Brad Davis wrote: On Monday 22 March 2004 19:18, Charles Sprickman wrote: Hi, I'm finally settling in to a nice vpopmail install, and I'm trying to help our support staff deal with this wildly different system (the old mailserver was sendmail/uw-imap). There were a number of shell scripts and

Re: [vchkpw] call for scripts/tools

2004-03-23 Thread X-Istence
others. Regards, Rick Just post em to the vpopmail sourceforge site, its a quick easy thing to signup, and then post em to be added to the contrib directory. X-Istence

Re: [vchkpw] Encryption

2004-04-02 Thread X-Istence
to rewrite the CMS so it accepts crypt'ed passwords, or rewrite vpopmail to instead of crypt use MD5, as there is no way to convert one to the other. X-Istence

  1   2   >