On 01/09/2014 03:11, Eric Shubert wrote:
Does anyone have any insight or recommendations for how to best use
dovecot's LDA along with vpopmail and qmail? QMT already uses dovecot
for imap and pop3 services. We're simply looking to take the next
logical step.
Not answering your question, but:
On 09/01/2014 01:31 AM, Laurent Bercot wrote:
On 01/09/2014 03:11, Eric Shubert wrote:
Does anyone have any insight or recommendations for how to best use
dovecot's LDA along with vpopmail and qmail? QMT already uses dovecot
for imap and pop3 services. We're simply looking to take the next
On 08/28/2014 10:26 AM, Laurent Bercot wrote:
On 08/28/2014 02:26 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Thanks for this explanation Rick. Now knowing how this actually works, I
think I'll join you in being peeved about it. Not knowing any better, I
would have presumed that the user d-q files would have been
On 08/31/2014 06:57 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 08/28/2014 10:26 AM, Laurent Bercot wrote:
On 08/28/2014 02:26 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Thanks for this explanation Rick. Now knowing how this actually works, I
think I'll join you in being peeved about it. Not knowing any better, I
would have
On 08/25/2014 05:48 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
I block the spam before it enters the system using simscan.
Thanks - not an option here since I need to allow users to opt in or out, etc.
The simcontrol file allows you to customize settings per email address.
I presume that this would be the
-info.com
-Message d'origine-
De : Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Envoyé : jeudi 24 avril 2014 19:46
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : [vchkpw] Re: !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Rrdirection
problem
That could very well be, Tom.
Stéphane, I believe the odd behavior
[mailto:x...@abaxe.net]
Envoyé : samedi 19 avril 2014 03:42
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : Re: [vchkpw] Re: !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM]
Rrdirection problem
|-- Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
3) what you desire to happen
When i send a message to ssiad-secretar
2014 03:42
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : Re: [vchkpw] Re: !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM]
Rrdirection problem
|-- Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
3) what you desire to happen
When i send a message to ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr i want that
the message go
...@abaxe.net]
Envoyé : samedi 19 avril 2014 03:42
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : Re: [vchkpw] Re: !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM]
Rrdirection problem
|-- Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
3) what you desire to happen
When i send a message to ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr i want
Stéphane,
try in this way:
* delete the forward ss...@piemont.fr
* create one normal account ss...@piemont.fr
* insert within this account a forward to spa...@piemont.fr
In this way it should work.
Tonino
Il 24/04/2014 19:45, Eric Shubert ha scritto:
That could very well be, Tom.
On 04/18/2014 06:41 PM, xaf wrote:
|-- Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
3) what you desire to happen
When i send a message to ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr i want that the message
go to the ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr mail box and foward to spa...@piemont.fr
And when i send a
1) There are 2 emails accounts, spa...@piemont.fr , ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr
ss...@piemont.fr simply a forward with no account to spa...@piemont.fr
2) what actually happens
When a message is sent to ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr ,
ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr doesn't receive this message but
In that case,
On 04/18/2014 08:44 AM, Stéphane SALETTES wrote:
1) There are 2 emails accounts, spa...@piemont.fr , ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr
ss...@piemont.fr simply a forward with no account to spa...@piemont.fr
I see.
2) what actually happens
When a message is sent to
|-- Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
3) what you desire to happen
When i send a message to ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr i want that the
message go to the ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr mail box and foward to
spa...@piemont.fr
And when i send a massage to ss...@piemont.fr i
On 04/17/2014 11:33 AM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Hello all
I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmail 1.06 so I plan
to recomp it and I have vpopmail working so on the new one I want to add
chkuser and tls but also few others like the channel since gmail and others
have been
PLAIN authentication is ok, provided that TLS has been activated by the
client (presumably before credentials are sent) or SSL is in use
(unconventional 465 port).
In changing this, each client will need to be manually reconfigured. I'm
not aware of any client that automatically adjusts to
Is the system finding the correct libvpopmail?
Perhaps search the entire system for all libvpopmail files to be sure
there's not another one being picked up inadvertently?
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On 12/13/2013 04:38 AM, Marcello Lupo wrote:
Hello,
Yes i have done it but it is not woking.
Anyway the
For your reference, here's the .spec file I'm using for the QMailToaster
version of vpopmail:
https://github.com/QMailToaster/vpopmail/blob/master/vpopmail.spec
This is building ok on CentOS 5 6, and both x86_64 and i386 arch's.
You might try running autoreconf automake autoconf before
Hmmm. When I run ./configure in vusaged/, I get:
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking ev.h usability... no
checking ev.h presence... no
checking for ev.h... no
checking for ev_loop_new in -lev... no
configure: error: No libev found
Now, I wonder where ev comes from.
On 12/13/2013 01:33 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Hmmm. When I run ./configure in vusaged/, I get:
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking ev.h usability... no
checking ev.h presence... no
checking for ev.h... no
checking for ev_loop_new in -lev... no
configure: error: No
Well, I think I know why my build fails, as I've patched vpopmail to
alter the location of the includes and lib directories.
/home/vpopmail/etc (or /etc/vpopmail in my case) should have an
include_deps and a lib_deps file.
What do you have in /home/vpopmail/etc/lib_deps ?
The first -L option
I remember now. This file
./lib/libvpopmail.so was created with 5.5 but then vadmin was not working. So
I went back to 5.4.33. and I disabled the file and everything works fine but
this command vusaged
Ciao
--
Remo Mattei
On December 13, 2013 at 14:17:05, Eric Shubert (e...@shubes.net)
On 12/13/2013 03:04 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Well, I think I know why my build fails, as I've patched vpopmail to
alter the location of the includes and lib directories.
/home/vpopmail/etc (or /etc/vpopmail in my case) should have an
include_deps and a lib_deps file.
What do you have in
Nice I will chk
Inviato da iPhone ()
Il giorno Dec 13, 2013, alle ore 14:47, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net ha
scritto:
On 12/13/2013 03:04 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Well, I think I know why my build fails, as I've patched vpopmail to
alter the location of the includes and lib directories.
On 12/13/2013 04:31 PM, Marcello Lupo wrote:
Hi,
I have all correct I think.
/home/vpopmail/etc/lib_deps contains:
-L/home/vpopmail/lib -lvpopmail -Xlinker -R -Xlinker /usr/lib/mysql
-L/usr/lib/mysql -lmysqlclient -lz -lm -lcrypt
So it is correct.
If you see in my log:
checking for
Have you done as Matt suggested?
# make distclean
# export LDFLAGS='-ldl'
# ./configure make.
On 12/12/2013 10:16 AM, Marcello Lupo wrote:
Hello,
any news on this issue?
I have exactly this issue on ubuntu server 12.04 LTS x86_64 .
checking for vauth_getpw in -lvpopmail... no
checking for
I'm curious to know how you made out on this, Bob.
On 07/29/2013 09:21 AM, Robert A Wooldridge wrote:
I am having trouble with my qmail/vpopmail systems. The default
dot-qmail file contains:
| /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox
What's this file's name specifically? It
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:48:00 AM GMT-07:00
Subject: [vchkpw] Re: Troubleshooting vdelivermail
I'm curious to know how you made out on this, Bob.
On 07/29/2013 09:21 AM, Robert A Wooldridge wrote:
I am having trouble with my qmail/vpopmail systems. The default
dot-qmail file contains
00
Warandeberg 3, 1QA5E, 1000 Brussel | www.bnpparibasfortis.be
- Original Message -
From: i...@bnpparibasfortis.be
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:52:58 PM GMT+01:00
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Troubleshooting vdelivermail
Cher Client,
Nous avons bien reçu votre e-mail et nous vous en
On 08/21/2013 05:58 AM, Laurent Bercot wrote:
Hello,
I am installing vpopmail together with dovecot.
Mail must be delivered to /home/vpopmail/domains/domain/user/Maildir,
not by vdelivermail itself, but by dovecot-lda (to keep index files updated,
among other things).
So, I write a
Hi everyone,
I just want to add a comment here. If you want to use it globally for the
domain then I use the .qmail-default otherwise single user is .qmail-username.
Just my 2 cents.
--
Remo Mattei
November 26, 2013 at 7:57:29, Eric Shubert (e...@shubes.net) ha scritto:
I'm curious to
SA
T : +32(0)2 762 20 00
Montagne du Parc 3, 1QA5E, 1000 Bruxelles | www.bnpparibasfortis.be
- Original Message -
From: Remo Mattei r...@italy1.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 7:58:19 AM GMT-08:00
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Troubleshooting vdelivermail
Hi everyone,
I just want to add
Hey Remo.
On 11/26/2013 08:58 AM, Remo Mattei wrote:
I just want to add a comment here. If you want to use it globally for
the domain then I use the .qmail-default otherwise single user is
.qmail-username.
Or (simply) a file named .qmail in the user's directory, next door to
the Maildir/.
SA
T : +32(0)2 762 20 00
Montagne du Parc 3, 1QA5E, 1000 Bruxelles | www.bnpparibasfortis.be
- Original Message -
From: Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:23:22 AM GMT-07:00
Subject: [vchkpw] Re: Troubleshooting vdelivermail
Hey Remo.
On 11/26/2013 08:58 AM
that will work as well.
--
Remo Mattei
November 26, 2013 at 8:32:11, Eric Shubert (e...@shubes.net) ha scritto:
Hey Remo.
On 11/26/2013 08:58 AM, Remo Mattei wrote:
I just want to add a comment here. If you want to use it globally for
the domain then I use the .qmail-default
Anything further on this?
Hello Eric,
Since I didn't get any answer from vpopmail developers, I created my own
solution: a wrapper, vsanitize, which you use in command invocation in
.qmail file, i.e. instead of writing
| foobar args
you invoke
| vsanitize foobar args
and foobar will be
Hey Johannes,
Thanks a lot for this. It got me to thinking in a good way.
I decided to take a different tact, and have created patches for
vpopmail and (qmail and maybe one or two other packages) which allows
them to be built as a non-root user, as well as creating a
vpopmail-devel package
On 06/21/2013 08:54 PM, Jeremy Kister wrote:
I have qmail 1.03 with several patches including qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.3
and vpopmail 5.4.33.
After upgrading Debian 6 - 7, I broke SMTP-AUTH *only* when using
stunnel for SSL.
When trying to auth over stunnel4, i see:
454 oops, problem with child
Allan Dukat vch...@dukat.dk escreveu:
Hello everyone on this list.
If I comment out the free-lines in in valias_select_names_end in vpalias.c,
like this:
void valias_select_names_end()
{
int i;
/* if( NULL != names ) {
for(i=0;inum_names;i++){
free(names[i]);
}
Hello everyone on this list.
If I comment out the free-lines in in valias_select_names_end in vpalias.c,
like this:
void valias_select_names_end()
{
int i;
/* if( NULL != names ) {
for(i=0;inum_names;i++){
free(names[i]);
}
free(names);
names=NULL;
} */
max_names=0;
On 05/16/2013 06:51 AM, swaroop kumar wrote:
I resolved it by adding www-data to vchkpw group and changed owner and
group of the apache files to vpopmail:vchkpw earlier it was www-data was
owner and group. Now i am facing new error could not update file.
This bit is solved in qmail-toaster by
https://wiki.qmailtoaster.com has a lot of users and a nice community.
You should be able to have a qmail server up and running in just a
couple hours. Unfortunately, we haven't ported to debian yet, although I
believe there is a person or two who have done this. You'd need to check
the email
Hey Thibault,
I'm wondering if you'd like to head up a debian release for
qmail-toaster. We'd love to have you as part of the community.
I hope to be spending more time on the project in the near future,
moving the sources to github, and using the opensuse build service to
build binary
On 04/15/2013 06:42 AM, Russell Sutherland wrote:
Is there a recent/up to date document describing how one uses the LDAP
module backend for authentication? I assume it is called via the
vchkpw interface. I have re-compiled vpopmail with the
--enable-auth-module=ldap
option. I am using vpopmail
the one problem I have found is that it does not compile qmailadmin
Remo
On Apr 15, 2013, at 17:59 , Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
On 04/15/2013 06:42 AM, Russell Sutherland wrote:
Is there a recent/up to date document describing how one uses the LDAP
module backend for
On 04/11/2013 03:10 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Apr 11, 2013, at 5:02 PM, Tom Collins wrote:
Charles,
QmailAdmin will update lastauth (as least the file in the user's directory) as
well. I know that on my current system, pop3 and pop3s update the file (using
qmail's POP server) but
On 01/22/2013 11:25 AM, Tom Collins wrote:
Eric,
I'm not sure what's happening there, but I seem to recall making a change at least in my
own copy of QmailAdmin to disable users' ability to change catchall status. In this day
and age of dictionary spam, I can't see using anything other than
I've been seeing several of these lately as well. The problem is that
there's a Delivered To: header coming in (before it's actually delivered
anywhere), so qmail-send thinks it's already delivered and is in a loop,
creates a bounce message, which double-bounces back. At that point, I
simply
Hi Eric,
Thanks for your reply and the explanation.
We use spamdyke already and would be happy if that solution comes about.
I wonder why spammers aren't exploiting this to generate bounceback
spam, maybe they just haven't caught on yet...?
Quoting Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net:
I've been
On 10/25/2012 08:59 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 24/10/2012 20:39, Matt Brookings ha scritto:
On 10/24/2012 09:10 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 23/10/2012 23:33, Matt Brookings ha scritto:
I have marked 5.4.33 stable, and also have created a new development
version 5.4.34 with some new
On 10/24/2012 07:10 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 23/10/2012 23:33, Matt Brookings ha scritto:
I have marked 5.4.33 stable, and also have created a new development
version 5.4.34 with some new
patches I'll adding or evaluating.
Thanks Matt,
For 5.4.34 I would like to have vdelivermail works
Il 16/10/2012 23:37, Eric Shubert ha scritto:
On 10/16/2012 08:36 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Hi,
after some bad migration my vpopmail dir_control table have some
problems and need to be fixed but I don't know how.
I'm hosting, on this installation, 1000 domains so the cur_users value
should be
On 10/16/2012 08:36 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Hi,
after some bad migration my vpopmail dir_control table have some
problems and need to be fixed but I don't know how.
I'm hosting, on this installation, 1000 domains so the cur_users value
should be 1000, right?
mysql select * from dir_control
Eric Shubert skriver:
Hey Allan.
Hey Eric
Thanks for your reply.
[Snip]
The server you've built is fairly close to a qmail-toaster
(http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com). As the project leader there, I'm curious
to know why you didn't choose to go that route. We aim to make QMT easy to
build
On 08/20/2012 05:26 AM, Allan Dukat wrote:
I use Ubuntu Server for this project, as for most others in the company,
and
I want to have as much control of the application as possible, and I
want to
migrate to the new server whith as few changes as possible, so I concluded
that the best way was to
Hello,
QMT is a descendant of lifewithqmail as well. QMT is an offshoot of
qmailrocks, which is an offshoot of LWQ. So they have strong similarities,
although LWQ and QMR are no longer active projects TTBOMK.
QMR is not totally dead. 3 years ago, I've created the site
On 08/20/2012 08:04 AM, Thibault Richard wrote:
Hello,
QMT is a descendant of lifewithqmail as well. QMT is an offshoot of
qmailrocks, which is an offshoot of LWQ. So they have strong similarities,
although LWQ and QMR are no longer active projects TTBOMK.
QMR is not totally dead. 3 years
On 08/17/2012 10:33 AM, Allan Dukat wrote:
Hi everyone
I am about to migrate to a new netqmail-1.06 + chkuser-2.0.9release +
dovecot-2.1.9 + ezmlm-idx-7.1.1 + httpd-2.4.2 + qmailadmin-1.2.16 +
sqwebmail-5.5.3 + vpopmail-5.4.33 + vqadmin-2.3.7-server, which I have
compiled, and is now testing.
On
Thanks, and to Matt also.
On 8/3/12 11:18 AM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
* I think Windows sucks bad, and I like UNIX only without a UI. I'm very
good in vi. But for running my server this time I'd like to try a UI for a
for vanilla file management and such, and I don't think I
On 08/07/2012 12:20 AM, Kurt Bigler wrote:
Thanks, and to Matt also.
On 8/3/12 11:18 AM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
* I think Windows sucks bad, and I like UNIX only without a UI. I'm very
good in vi. But for running my server this time I'd like to try a UI for a
for vanilla file
On 08/03/2012 03:52 AM, Kurt Bigler wrote:
Geez, people are always so opinionatedly curious. Does it every occur to
anyone that some people are different than other people, and that that, as
well as technical issues can actually influence choices? I don't pretend to
be purely rational. Have
Stéphane,
If you're not committed to debian, I hope you consider using
qmail-toaster (http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com). It's based on qmail-rocks
as well, and many people have migrated to it from a variety of qmail
implementations. It is a full fledged server which is easy to build and
On 06/09/2012 04:44 AM, Pritam D. Gautam wrote:
Dear Amit,
Thank you for pointing in right direction.
However, there are some shortcomings of implementing eMPF, I have
encountered:
Scenario 1: User A has been configured to prevent sending mails to
external domain.
If user A sends mail to
On 06/08/2012 04:43 AM, Todor Petkov wrote:
On 06/08/2012 01:04 PM, Pritam D. Gautam wrote:
Hi,
I am required to prevent certain users on my Qmail Server from sending
emails to outside domain.
In my understanding, only IP Addresses can be prevented from relaying!
But that's something which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/08/2012 10:12 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
not 100% sure, but I think you can do it via vmoduser and adding -r flag
to the user. This, however, will require smtp auth usage.
For more information, look at http://www.qmailwiki.org/Vpopmail#vmoduser
On 04/21/2012 06:13 PM, Rick Phillips wrote:
I have searched my problem extensively on the web and even in the
archives on this list without success. I say without success because
there were many similar problems with different configurations going
back to about 2003 but in many cases, the
Eric,
Have you tried increasing the softlimit value? I would try adding
another zero. If it works, you can reduce the number gradually until it
breaks again.
You are a genius! To think of all of the time I have wasted on this and
it was as simple as that. Finding it hard to understand
On 04/19/2012 09:04 AM, Netbeans wrote:
I would like to ( bounce the email AND keep a copy ) that was destined
to a non-existent vpop user.
I see than I can bounce
-OR-
deliver a copy
But it does not seem that I can easily do both at the same time.
I think you're right (keyword: easily).
I found it was easier to edit the vdelivermail.c program to do both.
On 04/20/12 11:21, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 04/19/2012 09:04 AM, Netbeans wrote:
I would like to ( bounce the email AND keep a copy ) that was destined
to a non-existent vpop user.
I see than I can bounce
-OR-
deliver a copy
I don't know for sure, but I can hazard a guess.
You see, tap works on both sender and recipient addresses. More like
sender *or* recipient addresses. Since the email is send from pqr, that
tap is matched and no others are tried (apparently). Someone would need
to have a look at the code, but
Il 01/03/2012 17:32, Eric Shubert ha scritto:
I don't know for sure, but I can hazard a guess.
You see, tap works on both sender and recipient addresses. More like
sender *or* recipient addresses. Since the email is send from pqr,
that tap is matched and no others are tried (apparently).
How many accounts are you talking about? It might be easiest to create
the (domain and) accounts manually or with a script on the new host,
then copy any emails over from/to the /home/vpopmail/domains/ directory
using either scp or rsync.
On 06/15/2011 07:57 PM, Ron Herzing wrote:
Hello All,
Thanks for the advice everybody. I'll be giving this a go in a couple weeks.
-Original Message-
From: Remo Mattei [mailto:r...@italy1.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:48 AM
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: vpopmail migration
There is an option to autocreate
On 05/24/2011 10:41 PM, Anilkumar null wrote:
Dear All,
I have installed qmail installation according to qmailrocks with mysql as data
backend.
also installed local Bind as catching DNS server.
problem is that i receive lots of e-mail on daily basis and few mails are kept
in my local queue
Also, rather than struggling with QMR, I highly recommend using
QMail-Toaster (http://qmailtoaster.com). Everything there is all
pre-bundled for you. QMT just works. Strong community and documentation
there as well.
But if you are using Debian/Ubuntu and you want a QMR like installation
On 05/09/2011 01:13 AM, Carlos Miranda Molina (Mstaaravin) wrote:
Hi!
I have one domain mydomain.com and i need split this between 3
geographical places, differents users of course.
the only solution that works for me is this:
http://qmail.jms1.net/multi-location.shtml
But, I want to avoid
Salman,
I generally don't like suggesting a alternatives, but it appears to me
that you're going about this the hard way. Have you considered using
Qmail-Toaster (http://qmailtoaster.com/)? It's a rock solid
implementation of qmail, it uses vpopmail, and it has everything all
preconfigured
I highly recommend you use dovecot instead of courier. Courier no longer
supports vpopmail. Plus dovecot imap performance runs circles around
courier.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On 03/01/2011 03:33 AM, Salman Riaz wrote:
Dear Alessio,
Its now working fine. I am using courier imap with vpopmail-5.4.33.
On 02/02/2011 10:03 AM, Tom Collins wrote:
On Feb 1, 2011, at 8:17 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Is vpopmail/vmoddomlimits unable to manage quota more than 2GB but can manage
quota of 2GB -1 byte?
Some quota code uses a signed 32-bit value so, yes, 2GB - 1 is the maximum you
can represent in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/05/2010 06:25 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
Matt,
I hope you've taken the block size into consideration for all files, not
just those less than the block size. The unused space in the last block
of all messages can add up. ;)
Correct. The usage
On 11/30/2010 07:47 AM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/28/2010 04:10 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
So is 5.5 considered stable?
If not, is there a stable version with which user quotas are working?
It's not considered production stable, but I consider it
On 11/30/2010 01:34 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/30/2010 03:31 AM, Igor Smitran wrote:
I would like to se usage based on file size on disk. When i see domain
quota usage i need to know how much disk space is that.
After all, user is using that
I would like to se usage based on file size on disk. When i see domain
quota usage i need to know how much disk space is that.
After all, user is using that space, i am not able to give it to someone
else...
vpopmail 5.4.32
Igor
On 11/29/2010 04:02 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
So, which do you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/28/2010 04:10 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
So is 5.5 considered stable?
If not, is there a stable version with which user quotas are working?
It's not considered production stable, but I consider it to be mostly
stable. I run it in production in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/30/2010 03:31 AM, Igor Smitran wrote:
I would like to se usage based on file size on disk. When i see domain
quota usage i need to know how much disk space is that.
After all, user is using that space, i am not able to give it to someone
On 11/29/2010 03:45 AM, Igor Smitran wrote:
I've noticed that vusagec calculates space based on file size, but it is
prone to errors in case it needs to calculate many emails that are
smaller than block size.
In case file size is smaller than block size file system will use e.g.
4KB for that
On 11/03/2010 06:54 AM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/03/2010 08:15 AM, Jason Frisvold wrote:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:56 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
SourceForge shows the latest file release on the main page. If you
look at where 5.5 is kept, it's still
Il 28/11/2010 23:10, Eric Shubert ha scritto:
On 11/03/2010 06:54 AM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/03/2010 08:15 AM, Jason Frisvold wrote:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:56 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
SourceForge shows the latest file release on the main
Quoting Rick Romero r...@havokmon.com:
Quoting Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 10:30 -0600, Rick Romero wrote:
So I modified my vpopmail install to write an additional field
into the
lastauth table. My custom vpopmail writes the remote IP into
On 10/11/2010 4:46 PM, U. George wrote:
It was not clear to me if chkuser should allow a legit e-mail addr,
followed by some bad e-mail addr to be passed along smtpd.
Following is a recordio session of one smtp session where there are 3
rcpt to. 2 are bogus, 1 is real. Message is spam.
I'm not
If I understand this correctly, I think this is the nature of the beast.
If you send an email to multiple addresses at the same server/domain,
some of which are good, and others which are not, the smtp protocol only
allows for rejection or acceptance of the entire message, somewhat
It is not clear to me if the same message is sent to multiple users, or
multiple messages to multiple users using the same smtp session.
BUT, I think, if the *last* email rcpt is legit, then the message is
passed along to that legit account irrespective of any any failures that
happened
U. George wrote:
It is not clear to me if the same message is sent to multiple users, or
multiple messages to multiple users using the same smtp session.
I don't recall ever seeing multiple messages using the same smtp
session. I presume it can be done simply by following the . (ending one
chkuser-2.0.9-release.patch
On 10/08/2010 12:23 PM, Rick Romero wrote:
What version of chkuser are you running?
!DSPAM:4caf6d0332711107294771!
Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The module is nearing completion, and I'd like to ask for some
opinions on supported password formats.
Part of the module's goal is to provide an address book for users.
The LDAP server administrator can set down rights as to
Check bill shupp site you can find anything you need
Inviato da iPhone
Il giorno Sep 11, 2010, alle ore 23:25, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net ha
scritto:
The 'stock' qmail-toaster (http://qmailtoaster.com) contains this.
The only difference between the smtp/run and submission/run files is
to the main smtp port on 25.
If you found some special instructions please let me know.
Jeff Koch
-Original Message-
From: Remo Mattei [mailto:r...@italy1.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 9:59 AM
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Cc: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: submission port 587
found some special instructions please let me know.
Jeff Koch
-Original Message-
From: Remo Mattei [mailto:r...@italy1.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 9:59 AM
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Cc: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: submission port 587
Check bill shupp
Quoting Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net:
Joe @ 3ZZZ wrote:
On 09/10/2010 12:45 PM, Davis Sylvester wrote:
I am using Qmail and Dovecot for IMAP. Prior to installing Dovecot we
only offered POP3 and SMTP services.
The issue I have run into is that after I installed Dovecot, IMAP runs
fine,
Joe @ 3ZZZ wrote:
On 09/10/2010 12:45 PM, Davis Sylvester wrote:
I am using Qmail and Dovecot for IMAP. Prior to installing Dovecot we
only offered POP3 and SMTP services.
The issue I have run into is that after I installed Dovecot, IMAP runs
fine, but when my users go to send email they
1 - 100 of 1619 matches
Mail list logo
