Re: [vchkpw] Re: Webmail question
söndagen den 24 augusti 2003 23.24 skrev Michael Bowe: > I have also been using that software on my server for a while now > > It seems to work very well > > Michael I'm maintaining the php-mmcache and php-apc packages for Mandrake Linux, I like the php-mmcache package more though. Direct links: Use the upcoming Mandrake Linux 9.2 release..., or grab the source rpm packages here (rpm --rebuild the_package.src.rpm): ftp://ftp.uninett.no/linux/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/contrib/SRPMS/php-apc-4.3.2_2.0-1mdk.src.rpm ftp://ftp.uninett.no/linux/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/contrib/SRPMS/php-mmcache-4.3.2_2.3.23-1mdk.src.rpm Or visit the authors web sites: http://pear.php.net/package/APC http://www.turcksoft.com/en/e_mmc.htm Cheers. PS. Sorry for the OT plug..., but... > - Original Message - > From: "Paul Theodoropoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:14 AM > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Webmail question > > > >> i *am* using a software PHP accelerator, and there's no good reason > > for > > > >> anyone to run squirrelmail without one - it dramatically reduces CPU > > demand. > > > for those who may be interested, and also unaware of it, there is a > > freeware php accelerator out there. it works great, and i highly > > recommend it. figured this was an appropriate followup to my own post. > > > > http://www.php-accelerator.co.uk/ > > > > > > > > > > Paul Theodoropoulos > > http://www.anastrophe.com
Re: [vchkpw] Re: Webmail question
Has anyone considered the Alternative PHP Cache http://apc.communityconnect.com/ ?? It's the PHP accelerator that is compiled in when you use the Apache Toolbox kit http://www.apachetoolbox.com Just curious why you guys use the one you do? > I have also been using that software on my server for a while now > > It seems to work very well > > Michael > > - Original Message - > From: "Paul Theodoropoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:14 AM > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Webmail question > > >> >> >> i *am* using a software PHP accelerator, and there's no good reason > for >> >> anyone to run squirrelmail without one - it dramatically reduces CPU > demand. >> >> for those who may be interested, and also unaware of it, there is a >> freeware php accelerator out there. it works great, and i highly >> recommend >> it. figured this was an appropriate followup to my own post. >> >> http://www.php-accelerator.co.uk/ >> >> >> >> >> Paul Theodoropoulos >> http://www.anastrophe.com >> >> >> >> > > >
Re: [vchkpw] Re: Webmail question
I have also been using that software on my server for a while now It seems to work very well Michael - Original Message - From: "Paul Theodoropoulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:14 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Webmail question > > >> i *am* using a software PHP accelerator, and there's no good reason for > >> anyone to run squirrelmail without one - it dramatically reduces CPU demand. > > for those who may be interested, and also unaware of it, there is a > freeware php accelerator out there. it works great, and i highly recommend > it. figured this was an appropriate followup to my own post. > > http://www.php-accelerator.co.uk/ > > > > > Paul Theodoropoulos > http://www.anastrophe.com > > > >
Re: [vchkpw] Re: Webmail question
i *am* using a software PHP accelerator, and there's no good reason for anyone to run squirrelmail without one - it dramatically reduces CPU demand. for those who may be interested, and also unaware of it, there is a freeware php accelerator out there. it works great, and i highly recommend it. figured this was an appropriate followup to my own post. http://www.php-accelerator.co.uk/ Paul Theodoropoulos http://www.anastrophe.com
[vchkpw] Re: Webmail question
You know, if the Squirrel people GPl'd in the option to use sqwebmail direct Maildir access, that would be uber nice! I'm sure its been considered before. I think Squirrel already has options as to which SMTP method you want, and they *did* write their own IMAP interface code. Oh, that *would* be sweet. Paul Theodoropoulos wrote: At 02:22 PM 8/19/2003, Juan Enciso Condeña wrote: Squirrelmail use very CPU usage, I did have performance problem with this package I don't recommend webmail based php and perl. They don't work with very users, they have very problems with thousand account. You should use sqwebmail or another webmail based in C language. Somebody know others webmail based in C++? while i agree that php/perl based products use more CPU, it's not helpful to say that they _don't_ work with very [many] users, as it's simply untrue. I'm running squirrelmail and it runs just fine - on a Sun Ultra 2 200mhz. not exactly a speed demon. i *am* using a software PHP accelerator, and there's no good reason for anyone to run squirrelmail without one - it dramatically reduces CPU demand. squirrelmail is debateably the best webmail client around. My customers prefer it by a large margin over the other three webmail interfaces i offer (as mentioned before, TWIG, IMP, and sqwebmail). sqwebmail is frankly quite lame in my opinion. it's extremely thin on features, as apparently the author considers features to be bugs. the performance benefit of a webmail client that acts directly on the maildir is offset by the dreary, featureless interface. imnshfo Paul Theodoropoulos http://www.anastrophe.com
