Hello Julien,
Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 09:42:38, Julien Escario wrote:
JE Hello,
JE I also have an issue with a base64_decode() function which seems
incompatible
JE with amd64 arch.
JE I'm using the patch from milkys (http://www.mcmilk.de/qmail/)
JE Try to print the return string after base64
Hi,
On 27.07.2011 at 00:56 a...@ltmd.org wrote:
Just want to add that I tested right now and found that the same fresh
programs configurations and settings on the clean 32-bit system
working pretty good. Should I try once again to use recordio program
on a 64-bit system?
'recordio' only
Hello,
I also have an issue with a base64_decode() function which seems incompatible
with amd64 arch.
I'm using the patch from milkys (http://www.mcmilk.de/qmail/)
Try to print the return string after base64 decoding has been done to check if
your auth string is correct. If it's not, that's
Hello Rick,
Sunday, July 3, 2011, 17:15:29, Rick Macdougall wrote:
RM On 03/07/2011 5:11 AM, a...@ltmd.org wrote:
Hello Rick,
Saturday, July 2, 2011, 16:59:09, Rick Macdougall wrote:
User vpopmail realy exists. I also cannot find the
difference between working x86 server configuration and
Hello,
Wednesday, July 27, 2011, 00:05:10, anf wrote:
alo Hello Rick,
alo Sunday, July 3, 2011, 17:15:29, Rick Macdougall wrote:
RM On 03/07/2011 5:11 AM, anf wrote:
Hello Rick,
Saturday, July 2, 2011, 16:59:09, Rick Macdougall wrote:
User vpopmail realy exists. I also cannot find the
Hello Rick,
Saturday, July 2, 2011, 16:59:09, Rick Macdougall wrote:
User vpopmail realy exists. I also cannot find the
difference between working x86 server configuration and the new
amd64 one. I tried to reconfigure my system from no-multilib to
multilib and to reemerge netqmail and
On 03/07/2011 5:11 AM, a...@ltmd.org wrote:
Hello Rick,
Saturday, July 2, 2011, 16:59:09, Rick Macdougall wrote:
User vpopmail realy exists. I also cannot find the
difference between working x86 server configuration and the new
amd64 one. I tried to reconfigure my system from no-multilib to
On 01/07/2011 12:54 PM, a...@ltmd.org wrote:
User vpopmail realy exists. I also cannot find the
difference between working x86 server configuration and the new
amd64 one. I tried to reconfigure my system from no-multilib to
multilib and to reemerge netqmail and vpopmail ebuilds, but still no
On 30/06/2011 8:10 PM, a...@ltmd.org wrote:
I tried to migrate my mail service (qmail+vpopmail+mysql) to the
64-bit Gentoo platform and almost succeeded, but SMTP-AUTH problem
blocked me.
Right now I have no multilib 64-bit hardened Gentoo system with
netqmail-1.06, vpopmail-5.4.30-r2,
Hello Rick,
Friday, July 1, 2011, 16:13:45, Rick Macdougall wrote:
RM On 30/06/2011 8:10 PM, a...@ltmd.org wrote:
I tried to migrate my mail service (qmail+vpopmail+mysql) to the
64-bit Gentoo platform and almost succeeded, but SMTP-AUTH problem
blocked me.
Right now I have no multilib
I tried to migrate my mail service (qmail+vpopmail+mysql) to the
64-bit Gentoo platform and almost succeeded, but SMTP-AUTH problem
blocked me.
Right now I have no multilib 64-bit hardened Gentoo system with
netqmail-1.06, vpopmail-5.4.30-r2, dovecot-2.0.13 and some other
stuff. Everything seems
is
in Canadian... ;)
Regardless I hope you can track down your problem!
Regards,
Tren
From: James Cox ja...@imaj.es
To: vchkpw@inter7.com vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote
Thank you James, grazie Tonino.
!DSPAM:4a30ba6832669637967409!
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Patch in Shupp toaster is taken from Erwin Hoffmann's SMTP-AUTH (http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html
).
qmail 1.0.5 and 1.0.6 should be extremely similar and I wonder if
it is worth using 1.0.6.
Weird, i installed the patch with Erwin's
From: James Cox ja...@imaj.es
To: vchkpw@inter7.com vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Patch in Shupp
...@imaj.es
To: vchkpw@inter7.com vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Patch in Shupp toaster is taken from Erwin Hoffmann's SMTP-AUTH (http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html
).
qmail
!
Regards,
Tren
From: James Cox ja...@imaj.es
To: vchkpw@inter7.com vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Patch in Shupp toaster is taken from Erwin Hoffmann's SMTP-AUTH
- Original Message -
From: James Cox
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
I just did a fresh install of toaster.
i'm still getting these frustrating smtp auth problems - it's
conflating
is in
Canadian... ;)
Regardless I hope you can track down your problem!
Regards,
Tren
From: James Cox ja...@imaj.es
To: vchkpw@inter7.com vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote
Brian Lanier ha scritto:
- Original Message -
*From:* James Cox mailto:ja...@imaj.es
*To:* vchkpw@inter7.com mailto:vchkpw@inter7.com
*Sent:* Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:44 AM
*Subject:* Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
I just did a fresh install
: James Cox ja...@imaj.es
To: vchkpw@inter7.com vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Thu Jun 11 04:47:52 2009
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth with chkuser problems
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:41, James Cox wrote:
Patch in Shupp toaster is taken from Erwin Hoffmann's SMTP-AUTH
(http
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
1758 CHKUSER accepted sender
and... in my defines...
neither of
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
1758 CHKUSER
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
I used Bill's and works fine. I do have chkuser installed on mine with smtp
auth.
Remo
On 6/10/09 9:25 AM, Rick Macdougall ri...@ummm-beer.com wrote:
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cox wrote:
yeah, i saw that patch. but i am using the current version (i think?) 0.31
I'm not really sure *why* it would be happening and I don't really have a
solution
to pose to you. I just wanted you to be aware that the output you were
Here is mine you can try to use my settings..
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
export QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan
export NOP0FCHECK=1
export SIMSCAN_DEBUG=0
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 2200 \
Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:26, Rick Macdougall wrote:
James Cox wrote:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Roberto
James Cox ha scritto:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Roberto
James Cox ha scritto:
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output.
In the past other people with other auth patches
James Cox ha scritto:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output.
In the past other people
James Cox wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth patch which breaks the output.
In the past other people with
On 10 Jun 2009, at 22:00, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
James Cox ha scritto:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 18:02, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Roberto ha scritto:
Hi James,
what version of netqmail are you using?
does anybody knows if chkuser is compatible with 1.06?
Problem should be the auth
Hey,
Here's an (edited) example of a smtp conversation, with a netqmail
install with smtp auth and chkuser patches:
220 mail.23i.net ESMTP
EHLO imaj.es
250-mail.23i.net
250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
250-AUTH=LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
250-PIPELINING
250 8BITMIME
AUTH LOGIN
334 VXNlcm5hbWU6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cox wrote:
Anyone got any tips for how to skip those log lines? I've been looking
at the chkuser_settings and i'm not confident i've seen anything
immediately obvious. I'm also not convinced that these lines should ever
exist in the smtp
On 9 Jun 2009, at 18:16, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Cox wrote:
Anyone got any tips for how to skip those log lines? I've been
looking
at the chkuser_settings and i'm not confident i've seen anything
immediately obvious. I'm also not convinced
Hi James,
You are copying stderr (file descriptor 2) to your stdout (that's what
the terminating 21 is for). However, this log is only saved if
multilog is indeed catching it.
Find in the directory where this `run' file was located the directory
`log', and publish the content of the `run'
hey Harm,
Here's the run file for the log -
exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t
s250 n 10 /var/log/qmail/smtpd
and yeah- i figured that i'm pushing to stdout... which i expect the
log/run should catch via the multilog. therefore i'm a bit confused as
to
Hi James,
What version of chkuser are you using?
When I look at the 2.0.9 source, I see the following lines inside
chkuser_settings.h:
/*
* the following line enables debugging of chkuser
*/
/* #define CHKUSER_DEBUG */
/*
* The following line moves DEBUG output from STDOUT (default) to
I've had it running for a few hours, and have this:
1 CHKUSER rejected relaying
5 CHKUSER accepted any rcpt
28 CHKUSER relaying rcpt
362 CHKUSER accepted rcpt
1719 CHKUSER rejected rcpt
1758 CHKUSER accepted sender
and... in my defines...
neither of those two are
On 2007-08-17, at 2113, Trey Nolen wrote:
I would suggest starting another instance of qmail-smtpd on port
587 that does not use the rbls, and has its own tcp.submpt.cdb
that allows anyone to connect, but does not ever set RELAYCLIENT.
This allows all addresses, but will only allow relay
Thanks for the info.
Trey Nolen
- Original Message -
From: John Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp-auth and rblsmtpd
We have been using smtp-after-pop for a long time, but are also using
smtp-auth for some purposes. When users authenticate via POP, a line like
the following gets added to open-smtp:
ww.xx.yy.zz:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,RBLSMTPD=,WHITELIST= 1187395788
This keeps the users from being affected by
Trey Nolen wrote:
We have been using smtp-after-pop for a long time, but are also using
smtp-auth for some purposes. When users authenticate via POP, a line
like the following gets added to open-smtp:
ww.xx.yy.zz:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,RBLSMTPD=,WHITELIST= 1187395788
This keeps the users
I would suggest starting another instance of qmail-smtpd on port 587 that
does not use the rbls, and has its own tcp.submpt.cdb that allows anyone
to connect, but does not ever set RELAYCLIENT. This allows all addresses,
but will only allow relay for authenticated users.
Port 587, is the
On 8/17/2007 9:13 PM, Trey Nolen wrote:
being affected by the rblmtpd? For instance, is there a way to pass a
variable to tcpserver if the connection is authenticated via smtp-auth?
Not without patching. the process goes like this:
user - tcpserver - rblsmtpd - qmail-smtpd (with smtp-auth)
Chrisp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] smtp auth failed when no email to be retrieved
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 13:59 +0700, Winanjaya - CBN wrote:
Has the user checked the option my outgoing server requires
authentication
Dear All,
I am runnning qmail+vpopmail 5.4.17 with smtp auth for roaming users, my
users use Outlook Express as email client to send/receive email.
My problem is:
It seems like smtp auth failed (see below message) when he/she does not have
email to be retrieve.
I need advise..
Thanks Regards
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 13:59 +0700, Winanjaya - CBN wrote:
Has the user checked the option my outgoing server requires
authentication?
Shane
Dear All,
I am runnning qmail+vpopmail 5.4.17 with smtp auth for roaming users, my
users use Outlook Express as email client to send/receive email.
relay.
so your qmail acted normaily and denied a relay status for
the originating connecting ip.
kenneth gf brown
ceo shadowplay.net
-Original Message-
From: Winanjaya - CBN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 29, 2007 02:00
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: [vchkpw] smtp auth
Winanjaya - CBN wrote:
I am runnning qmail+vpopmail 5.4.17 with smtp auth for roaming users,
my users use Outlook Express as email client to send/receive email.
My problem is:
It seems like smtp auth failed (see below message) when he/she does
not have email to be retrieve.
The message
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] smtp auth failed when no email to be retrieved
well um
doesn't look like neone actually
hit any thing that would give them a
connection because your clients ip never appeared
in a pop b4 smtp connection.
your error message, and log extract as listed
does
so you meant this is outlook express problem?
regards
Winanjaya
New Page 1
- Original Message -
From: shadowplay.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 2:11 PM
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] smtp auth failed when no email to be retrieved
well um
Rick Macdougall escribió:
Mario Beltran wrote:
Hi
I have installed a new box on linux with qmail (i follow life with
qmail) + vpopmail + autorespond +ezmlm +qmailadmin + courier-imap
All works fine.
Now i need use smtp authentication.
I found a qmail-smtpd-auth-057 patch by Dr. Erwin
Hi
I have installed a new box on linux with qmail (i follow life with
qmail) + vpopmail + autorespond +ezmlm +qmailadmin + courier-imap
All works fine.
Now i need use smtp authentication.
I found a qmail-smtpd-auth-057 patch by Dr. Erwin Hoffmann. But I cant
aplied yet the patch.
The
Mario Beltran wrote:
Hi
I have installed a new box on linux with qmail (i follow life with
qmail) + vpopmail + autorespond +ezmlm +qmailadmin + courier-imap
All works fine.
Now i need use smtp authentication.
I found a qmail-smtpd-auth-057 patch by Dr. Erwin Hoffmann. But I cant
aplied
hi folks!
I could really need some help on this one:
I'm using qmail and vpopmail and just patched up with smtp-auth, compiled again
and everything seems to work fine... a telnet to my server with a following
ehlo hostname gives me:
250-mail.domain.de
250-AUTH LOGIN CRAM-MD5 PLAIN
I've upgraded to vpopmail (5.4.6) and decided to switch to smtp auth .. since I
couldn't get roaming working anyway.
I'm still getting rcpthosts errors,
where do I check how relay-ctrl and how it does things.
I'm fighting a loosing battle here ...
I followed the instructions on
If you are using an ebuild for qmail, can you send the output of the
following command to the list:
# emerge -vp qmail
I've upgraded to vpopmail (5.4.6) and decided to switch to smtp auth ..
since I couldn't get roaming working anyway.
I'm still getting rcpthosts errors,
where do I check
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:53:22 - (GMT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are using an ebuild for qmail, can you send the output of the
following command to the list:
# emerge -vp qmail
[ebuild R ] mail-mta/qmail-1.03-r15 -noauthcram -notlsbeforeauth
(-selinux) +ssl 0 kB
--
Henti
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 00:00:26 +0200
Henti Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:53:22 - (GMT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are using an ebuild for qmail, can you send the output of the
following command to the list:
# emerge -vp qmail
[ebuild R ]
On Jun 19, 2005, at 9:09 PM, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
I don't know what dovecot does. I recompiled it and restarted it,
no difference. Here's what shows up in the mail facility for
syslog:
# tail -f /var/log/mail/current
Jun 20 04:08:51 [imap-login] Login: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [71.113.2.184]
Jun
On Monday 20 June 2005 00:49, Tom Collins wrote:
Does dovecot link directly to libvpopmail? If so, did you
recompile dovecot after enabling learn passwords and cleartext
passwords in vpopmail? If not, it's still linked to the old
vpopmail code.
I don't know what dovecot does. I recompiled
On Friday 17 June 2005 20:20, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
AFAIR it does exactly what you said.
Nope, doesn't seem to. I rebuilt vpopmail with it enabled, edited
out the cleartext portions of a vpasswd file, and logged in a bunch
of times as that user. No updates to vpasswd. :(
Cheers,
--
sys: Fedora core3, manually compiled vpopmail 3.4.10, RPM Mysql 3.23.59?,
compiled courier imap 4.0.2, compiled qmail-1.03, patched
qmail-ej-cocktail-14.tar.gz, manually patched Tonix' chkuser 2.0.
I have installed vpopmail with roaming/SMTP-AUTH before, again using
Michael Bowe's webmail guide.
ISP Lists wrote:
sys: Fedora core3, manually compiled vpopmail 3.4.10, RPM Mysql 3.23.59?,
compiled courier imap 4.0.2, compiled qmail-1.03, patched
qmail-ej-cocktail-14.tar.gz, manually patched Tonix' chkuser 2.0.
I have installed vpopmail with roaming/SMTP-AUTH before, again using
Michael
On Jun 17, 2005, at 9:43 AM, ISP Lists wrote:
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver \
-H -l [[[my.host.name]]] \
-v -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \
-c 30 -R -u $VPOPMAILUID -g $VPOPMAILGID 0 smtp \
/usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -b -C \
-r 'sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org:Your message was rejected ' \
You've got an old SMTP AUTH patch that sends the MD5 challenge and
response in the wrong order.
Use the patch from the contrib directory of vpopmail, and then remove
the $LOCAL from your run file, as the newer SMTP AUTH patch does not
use it.
--
Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear all,
does anybody know is there any faq or instruction set to make
upgrade from normal pop-before-smtp to SMTP AUTH with MD5 ?
I have problems with MD5 (plain auth works ok) and donna know whats
wrong because I configured that with instructions written to sbdy
who had problems
You've got an old SMTP AUTH patch that sends the MD5 challenge and
response in the wrong order.
Use the patch from the contrib directory of vpopmail, and then remove
the $LOCAL from your run file, as the newer SMTP AUTH patch does not
use it.
--
Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 17, 2005, at 11:21 AM, ISP Lists wrote:
Built as netqmail-1.05, patched SMTP-AUTH from vpopmail contrib, then
manually added Tonix' chkuser 2.0
Everything is VERY happy now.
Did you remember to remove $LOCAL from your qmail-smtpd/run file? If
not, you can now auth with any
On Jun 17, 2005, at 11:21 AM, ISP Lists wrote:
Built as netqmail-1.05, patched SMTP-AUTH from vpopmail contrib, then
manually added Tonix' chkuser 2.0
Everything is VERY happy now.
Did you remember to remove $LOCAL from your qmail-smtpd/run file? If
not, you can now auth with any
On Friday 17 June 2005 17:42, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
1. I've reconfigured vpopmail and added
--enable-learn-passwords=y and --enable-clear-passwd=y
What is --enable-learn-passwords? If it does what I'm guessing it
does by name and starts recording missing cleartext entries in
On Friday, June 17, 2005, 10:06:46 PM, Casey wrote:
On Friday 17 June 2005 17:42, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
1. I've reconfigured vpopmail and added
--enable-learn-passwords=y and --enable-clear-passwd=y
What is --enable-learn-passwords? If it does what I'm guessing it
does by name
Hi,
I have IMAP authentication working for vpopmail and standard linux
users, but I have a problem with SMTP authentication.
I need SMTP authentication to work for standard linux users (I'm not
worried about vpop users at all for SMTP-AUTH). I have built my box
using the instructions on
Ken Jones wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2005 3:52 pm, Nick Gilbert wrote:
Hi,
I have IMAP authentication working for vpopmail and standard linux
users, but I have a problem with SMTP authentication.
I need SMTP authentication to work for standard linux users (I'm not
worried about vpop users at all for
On Monday 16 May 2005 4:10 pm, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Ken Jones wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2005 3:52 pm, Nick Gilbert wrote:
Hi,
I have IMAP authentication working for vpopmail and standard linux
users, but I have a problem with SMTP authentication.
I need SMTP authentication to work for
Hi there,
scenario:
netqmail 1.05 plus SMTP-AUTH Bill Shupp's patch
vpopmail-5.4.8 compiled with just --enable-logging=v
Many MAC's mua clients claims that they're unable to Send email
smtp-authenticated; I've noticed that these email clients (Entourage
mainly) makes APOP auth.
Maybe
Dave Goodrich wrote:
Tom Collins wrote:
On Jan 28, 2005, at 9:00 AM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
snip
Excellent, thank you. If I understand correctly I will also need to do
nothing to my current tcp.smtp file?
3) How does this effect users who do not supply auth info? Does
qmail-smtpd fall back to
On Feb 4, 2005, at 3:17 PM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
I don't see a standard port for smtp-auth, any thoughts? I've looked
through FreeBSD /etc/services file which is pretty complete, and found
no entry for smtp-auth. I'm leaning towards using port 9025.
Use port 587, 'submission'. It's just like
Dave Goodrich wrote:
I believe I will move our smtp-auth users to another port and just fire
up another instance of qmail-smtpd, leaving the normal qmail-smtpd
running on port 25.
I don't see a standard port for smtp-auth, any thoughts? I've looked
through FreeBSD /etc/services file which is
Tom Collins wrote:
On Jan 28, 2005, at 9:00 AM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
1) What is everyone else using?
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
DENYMAIL=DNSCHECK
export DENYMAIL
LOCAL=`/usr/bin/head -1
Good morning,
I find mysqlf in need of smtp auth for my users. I've looked at several
bits online about it and I have a few questions for the list.
qmail-1.03 as per qmail Handbook
qmail-maildir++.patch
qmail-0.0.0.0.patch
vpopmail-5.4.8 (MySQL auth)
FreeBSD 5.2.1
cat /service/qmail-smtpd/run
On Jan 28, 2005, at 9:00 AM, Dave Goodrich wrote:
1) What is everyone else using?
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
DENYMAIL=DNSCHECK
export DENYMAIL
LOCAL=`/usr/bin/head -1 /var/qmail/control/me`
/usr/bin/spamd
I'm running vpopmail-5.4.9, netqmail-1.05, and Bill Shupp's TLS + SMTP-AUTH
patch. It runs great...but the delay is bordering on grueling. No matter what
the client is it takes a goods 10-20 seconds to send mail. The server is 2G
P4..so it's not the server. Is it the patch...or something else
I'm having problems with SMTP Auth.
I have installed:
Netqmail 1.0.5
Vpopmail 5.4.8
Simscan 1.0.8 Spamassassin Clamav
Chkuser 2.0.7
Bill Shupp's composite TLS SMTP Auth patch, from
http://shupp.org/smtp-auth-tls/
The error I'm getting is this:
503 auth not available (#5.3.3)
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 13:56, Alastair Battrick wrote:
I'm having problems with SMTP Auth.
I have installed:
Netqmail 1.0.5
Vpopmail 5.4.8
Simscan 1.0.8 Spamassassin Clamav
Chkuser 2.0.7
Bill Shupp's composite TLS SMTP Auth patch, from
http://shupp.org/smtp-auth-tls/
The error
Ispas Paul wrote:
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 13:56, Alastair Battrick wrote:
I'm having problems with SMTP Auth.
snip
I am starting SMTP with
--
#!/bin/sh
QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/simscan
export QMAILQUEUE
QMAILDUID=`id -u vpopmail`
NOFILESGID=`id -g vpopmail`
I've built vpopmail 5.4.5 with mysql 3.23.57-ish on Debian potato. I've
enabled roaming users and have included the SMTP-AUTH patch. Courier,
vpopmail, qmail, and everything else compiled fine (I did not use Debian
packages).
POP3 works fine. Spam filtering works fine. Squirrelmail fine.
I've built vpopmail 5.4.5 with mysql 3.23.57-ish on Debian potato. I've
enabled roaming users and have included the SMTP-AUTH patch. Courier,
vpopmail, qmail, and everything else compiled fine (I did not use Debian
packages).
POP3 works fine. Spam filtering works fine. Squirrelmail fine.
On Aug 7, 2004, at 5:39 AM, ISP Lists wrote:
OK, I've found that it was a client software error where CRAM-MD5
login is
advertised first. Pegasus mail wouldn't keep trying to get to plain
LOGIN, but The BAT! would fail back from CRAM-MD5 to plain LOGIN and
roaming SMTP relay works fine.
If
Ron Culler wrote:
I'm and having difficulty setting up a separate qmail server as a
smtp-auth server.
(* Its being done to provide inbound virus scanning prior to the message
being delivered to the local mailbox)
I have successfully setup Qmail and can get smtp-auth to work with
checkpassword
I'm and having difficulty setting up a separate qmail server as a
smtp-auth server.
(* Its being done to provide inbound virus scanning prior to the message
being delivered to the local mailbox)
I have successfully setup Qmail and can get smtp-auth to work with
checkpassword and the local
Hi,
I've installed SPAMCONTROL and i've modified the tcp.smtp file like you
say (:allow,REQUIREAUTH="")
but now nobody can send me e-mail
the sender receive the message:
Your message has encountered delivery problems
to the following recipient(s):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery failed
535
Am Sonntag, 23. Mai 2004 21:28 schrieb blist:
First of all: I have the same problem - also on Dual-Opteron machines.
I also have been in contact with blist and X-ISTENCE...
Ok, after the huge number of irrevlent replies to my last thread I am
attempting to post an update on my SMTP Auth
Ok, after the huge number of irrevlent replies to my last thread I am
attempting to post an update on my SMTP Auth problem. I have tried just
most smtp patchs, the on in the contrib dir of vpopmail and
http://shupp.org/patches/netqmail-1.05-tls-smtpauth-20040207.patch I
have included
please trim your posts. trimming your signature would be courteous too. you
don't need to quote 63k of original message to append two sentences.
At 02:23 PM 5/23/2004, DEBO Jurgen E. G. wrote:
Hello blist,
Sunday, May 23, 2004, 9:28:35 PM, you wrote:
b If you've read this far, thanks!. Drop me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DEBO Jurgen E. G. wrote:
snip
First, I suggest You verify Your authentication. Start-tls is initiated,
in that case the pasword has to be plain-text, not cram.
First off, starttls is not initiated, as then he would have had to enter
starttls
Hi troll,
At 21:39 21.05.04 +0200, you wrote:
Hello Erwin,
Friday, May 21, 2004, 7:37:15 PM, you wrote:
EH Dr. Erwin Hoffmann | FEHCom | http://www.fehcom.de/
EH Wiener Weg 8, 50858 Cologne | T: +49 221 484 4923 | F: ...24
To be rude and without respect, this was the speciality of Your
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
