[vchkpw] Setting unlimited quota with vsetuserquota? How?

2003-03-07 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl 
Hello,
this might seem stupid, but how am I supposed to set unlimited quota
for single users with vsetuserquota? Intuitively, I'd have expect 0 or
-1 but both seem to yield in a 0 quota, i.e. account has 100% used
space even with only one mail in there.

I'd appreciate any clarification on this issue.

Regards and TIA,
Gabriel

RE: [vchkpw] Setting unlimited quota with vsetuserquota? How?

2003-03-07 Thread Clayton Weise 
Set the quota to NOQUOTA

-Original Message-
From: Gabriel Ambuehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 6:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [vchkpw] Setting unlimited quota with vsetuserquota? How?


Hello,
this might seem stupid, but how am I supposed to set unlimited quota for
single users with vsetuserquota? Intuitively, I'd have expect 0 or -1 but
both seem to yield in a 0 quota, i.e. account has 100% used space even with
only one mail in there.

I'd appreciate any clarification on this issue.

Regards and TIA,
Gabriel

Re[2]: [vchkpw] Setting unlimited quota with vsetuserquota? How?

2003-03-07 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Hello Clayton,

Friday, March 7, 2003, 4:44:07 PM, you wrote:

 Set the quota to NOQUOTA

Thanks. That should probably get into usage of vsetuserquota, I
guess...


Best regards,
 Gabriel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.0.2i

iQEVAwUBPmiySsZa2WpymlDxAQFKiQgAywk6liU/qUM1w2USTWYnAo7bDGdH2xTg
1Fpw8I/7E2X3X6vUdA+U1SrxXLovLkNPCpAgoUqm5S/5RIECpAkysTZEcBqjFbkw
riNc3UKLBX+waT2xyFFvXXWAFmwxOnR8FcCoadVvrlx4/aXvodofywelGY1ZP8k+
ORZRiyCkW1oHQNlZkRE14F6gpecv3RUKLtQ92JWJlB+Q6BBijELMstbgIOvn4b3r
nWvNEEs3QjGqoaHWR0LeR+Vz1zvrA7NJip/OR1JCTiURUPnQTMdZut9irOQO9MCE
AmFYjF9sDOLkXXI2Gf0cbK4q+O4Jo0l+605GQyemlLSgcr+JkSNGvQ==
=T30t
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re[6]: [vchkpw] Setting unlimited quota with vsetuserquota? How?

2003-03-07 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Hello Clayton,

Friday, March 7, 2003, 5:01:31 PM, you wrote:

 Yeah.. I agree that it should be in the usage for it, it would make
sense
 since it's not a numerical value so nobody would logically guess it.


I'll patch that the next time I fiddle with the SpamAssassin stuff
(most likely later today)


Best regards,
 Gabriel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.0.2i

iQEVAwUBPmi1Y8Za2WpymlDxAQFL2gf/WoNXQVaSZyktahDMuiHhN5scp+0Gy5hS
dZDpnkexF4msJ3ct/ZjvBI79IhNOXxT6CjV1nWx89S22FCFre4VTtBWJmZV8xXnT
zzgieViFhMwmSia0pgXGAuCWL2px2Em7bD6na4yc191bWAcGlhnJSurpxyfnfqPG
6rb1QtQmre94EVwRPIX+YLm5pyzvFjW4XSqAJHNeX8wXeNwC+oY53p3JAvQQx/Ol
7SFykvOrYALhdhgnnjXkuxdO+1pxDTxIUviw/EJ81GVBfNmRVphW0tM7vR/0W9j9
pMh8WwHGmVt1nfWG6zbOY72v0Y6JgKAf93X3a1Q/4GjMw9QNqfZaxg==
=Y5L6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-